PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Abstract
Objectives
The study assessed the status of Child-Oral Impact on Daily Performances (C-OIDP) and association between socio-economic status (SES) and C-OIDP in Korean children.
Methods
The study population was the citizens of Gangneung, aged 4-10 year-old, who were registered at a preschool and primary school. Finally, 1,943 among 2,489 finished the question and response (response rate 74.3%). The children completed the C-OIDP by a face-to-face interview or self-response questions evaluation. The ethic approval of the study protocol was approved form GWNUDH-IRB.
Results
Twenty-five percent of the participants answered that they had difficulties on their daily performances from oral health. Problem with cleaning of the mouth was the most frequent performance to be reported and the percentage of the children who had this experience was 20.7%. Fifteen percent of the participants answered that they had difficulties on their daily performances from oral health on a daily basis. Among the children who experienced difficulties on daily performances from oral health on a daily basis, 59.3% of the difficulties on daily performances were moderate or severe effect. Lower SES was significantly associated with the rate of their daily performances from oral health.
Figures and Tables
Table 1
Percentage distribution of participant's demographic & socio-demographic characteristics* (N=1,943)
Values mean N (%).
*No response except for the crosstabulation, †Chi-square test, ‡FAS (Family Affluence Scale)23): This scale consists of 4 items: i) does your family own cars? (0, 1, 2 or more), ii) do you have your own bedroom? (no, yes), iii) how many times did you travel on vacation with your family during the past year? (0, 1, 2, 3 or more), iv) how many computers does your family own? (0, 1, 2, 3 or more). The composite FAS score was calculated by summing the responses to these four items, and it ranged from low (0-3), middle (4-5), high (6-9).
Table 5
Distribution of C-OIDP by demographic & socio-demographic characteristics* (N=1,943)
Values mean N (%).
*No response except for the crosstabulation, †Chi-square test, ‡FAS (Family Affluence Scale)23): This scale consists of 4 items: i) does your family own cars? (0, 1, 2 or more), ii) do you have your own bedroom? (no, yes), iii) how many times did you travel on vacation with your family during the past year? (0, 1, 2, 3 or more), iv) how many computers does your family own? (0, 1, 2, 3 or more). The composite FAS score was calculated by summing the responses to these four items, and it ranged from low (0-3), middle (4-5), high (6-9).
References
1. Jung SH. New dental public health. 2012. 1st ed. Seoul: Komoonsa;24–25.
2. Locker D. Measuring oral health: a conceptual framework. Community Dent Health. 1988. 5:3–18.
3. WHO. The world oral health report 2003. Continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century: the approach of the WHO global oral health programme (WHO/NMH/NPH/ORH/03.2). 2003. Geneva: WHO;1–38.
4. Atchison KA, Dolan TA. Development of the Geriat ric Oral Health Assessment Index. J Dent Educ. 1990. 54:680–687.
5. Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health. 1994. 11:3–11.
6. Adulyanon S, Sheiham A. Oral Impacts on Daily Performances. measuring oral health and quality of life. 1997. Cha pel Hill: University of North Carolina;151–160.
7. Bae KH, Kim HD, Jung SH, Park DY, Paik DI, Chung SC. Physical pain in Oral Health Impact Profile among Korean adults (55+): Distribution and associated factors. J Korean Acad Oral Health. 2003. 27:527–537.
8. Ryu JI, Jung SH. Prevalence of the Oral Impacts on Daily Performance (OIDP) in elderly population, Gangneung city. J Korean Acad Oral Health. 2007. 31:205–213.
9. Shin SJ, Jung SH. A Korean version of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) in elderly populations: validity and reliability. J Korean Acad Oral Health. 2011. 35:187–195.
10. Tubert-Jeannin S, Pegon-Machat E, Gremeau-Richard C, Lecuyer MM, Tsakos G. Validation of a French version of the Child-OIDP index. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005. 113:355–362.
11. WHO Information series on school health document eleven. Oral health promotion: An essential element of a health-promoting school. 2003. Geneva: WHO.
12. Gherunpong S, Tsakos G, Sheiham A. Developing and evaluating an oral health-related quality of life index for children; the CHILD-OIDP. Community Dent Health. 2004. 21:161–169.
13. Yusuf H, Gherunpong S, Sheiham A, Tsakos G. Validation of an English version of the Child-OIDP index, an oral health-related quality of life measure for children. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006. 4:38.
14. Mtaya M, Astrøm AN, Tsakos G. Applicability of an abbre viated version of the Child-OIDP inventory among primary schoolchildren in Tanzania. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007. 5:40.
15. Cortés-Martinicorena FJ, Rosel-Gallardo E, Artazcoz-Osés J, Bravo M, Tsakos G. Adaptation and validation for Spain of the Child-Oral Impact on Daily Performance (C-OIDP) for use with adolescents. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010. 15:e106–e111.
16. Kim HY, Hong SM, Jung SH, Ahn YS. Validation of Korean version of Oral Impacts on Daily Performances for Children (COIDP). J Korean Acad Oral Health. 2010. 34:473–481.
17. Barbosa TS, Gavião MB. Oral health-related quality of life in children: part III. Is there agreement between parents in rating their children's oral health-related quality of life? A systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg. 2008. 6:108–113.
18. Nurelhuda NM, Ahmed MF, Trovik TA, Åstrom AN. Evaluation of oral health-related quality of life among Sudanese schoolchildren using Child-OIDP inventory. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010. 8:152.
19. Shin BM, Jung SH. Socio-economic inequalities in dental caries in Korea. J Korean Acad Oral Health. 2012. 36:144–152.
20. Jung SH, Bae SM. 2011 Oral health survey in Gangneung city. 2011. Gangneung: Gangneung-Wonju National University·Gangneung Public Center;16–41.
21. Jung SH, Bae SM, Park YJ. Oral health promotion program of community children care center throughout community based network. 2007. Gangneung: Gangneung-Wonju National University Industry Academy Cooperation Group·Korea Health Promotion Foundation;61–73.
22. Bae SM. Oral health promotion evaluation toolkit for pre-school children in Korea [dissertation]. 2009. Gangneung: Gangneung-Wonju National University;[Korean].
23. Currie C, Molcho M, Boyce W, Holstein B, Tordheim T, Richter M. Researching health inequalities in adolescents: the development of the Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) family affluence scale. Soc Sci Med. 2008. 66:1429–1436.
24. Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997. 25:284–290.
25. Ahn YS, Lee YS, Ryu DY. Study of oral health-related quality of life index for primary school oral health program. J Dent Hyg Sci. 2006. 6:79–84.
26. Shin BM, Jung SH. Socio-economic inequalities in self-rated oral health status of South Korea. J Korean Acad Oral Health. 2012. 36:219–227.
27. Kang EJ, Jang SH. Effects on dental caries of chilren's deciduous teeth in relation to their mothers' socioeconomic factors and their oral health beliefs. J Dent Hyg Sci. 2001. 1:31–41.
28. Lee SY. The association of dietary habits and socioeconomic factors in dental caries in Korean adults (from the 2001 Korean National Examination Health and Nutrition Survey). J Korean Acad Dent Hyg. 2010. 12:349–366.
29. Shin SJ, Chung WG, Ahn YS, Ma DS, Park DY, Jung SH. Association between socio-economic status and oral-related quality of life for elderly people. J Korean Acad Oral Health. 2011. 35:297–305.
XML Download