Abstract
Anti-Sda is of no clinical significance, because it rarely causes hemolytic transfusion reactions. Even when its presence is suspected during antibody screening test, further identification of the antibody is usually not performed. We experienced a case of anti-Sda in 73 yr-old male patient showing mixed field agglutination by microcolumn agglutination. Antibody specificity could not be identified by conventional antibody identification test, and it was proven to be anti-Sda by urine neutralization test. In spite of its little clinical significance, it may give incompatible crossmatching results reacting with Sda antigen, which occurs at a high frequency in general population. When incompatible crossmatch results arising from anti-Sda are suspected, the problem may be solved by using the urine-neutralized serum of in crossmatching test.
References
1. Macvie SI, Morton JA, Pickles MM. The reactions and inheritance of a new blood group antigen, Sda. Vox Sang. 1967. 13:485–492.
2. Renton PH, Howell P, Ikin EW, Giles CM, Goldsmith KLG. Anti-Sda, a new blood group antibody. Vox Sang. 1967. 13:493–501.
3. Daniels G, editor. Human blood groups. 2002. 2nd ed. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell;514–520.
4. Klein HG, Anstee DJ, editors. Mollison's blood transfusion in clinical medicine. 2005. 11th ed. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell;335.
5. Roback J, Combs MR, editors. Technical manual. 2008. 16th ed. Bethesda: American Association of Blood Banks;915–916.
7. Morton JA, Pickles MM, Terry AM. The Sda blood group antigen in tissues and body fluids. Vox Sang. 1970. 19:472–482.
8. Peetermans ME, Cole-Dergent J. Haemolytic transfusion reaction due to anti-Sda. Vox Sang. 1970. 18:67–70.
9. Reznicek MJ, Cordle DG, Strauss RG. A hemolytic reaction implicating Sda antibody missed by immediate spin crossmatch. Vox Sang. 1992. 62:173–175.
10. Tiegerman K. Neutralization of anti-Sda antibodies with N-acetylgalactosamine. Immunohematology. 1986. 2:96–98.