Abstract
Background
Malaria is a problematic disease in Korea, and microscopic examination of Giemsa-stained blood smear has been used as the gold standard for its diagnosis. However, this technique is time-consuming and has low sensitivity in samples with low numbers of malarial parasites (<20 parasites/µL). Here, we evaluated the performance characteristics of the LG Advansure™ Malaria P.f./P.v. real-time QPCR (LG life sciences, Korea).
Methods
Blood samples from 173 persons who visited Korea University Ansan Hospital were evaluated. QPCR was performed in 73 malaria patients and 100 healthy subjects by using the LG Advansure Malaria P.f./P.v. real-time QPCRR kit, and the results were compared with those of microscopy. The detection limit of this kit was determined by serial dilution of Plasmodium-infected blood with normal blood (blood not infected with Plasmodium).
Results
Among the 73 patients that were microscopically confirmed to have malaria (Plasmodium vivax infection, N=70, P. falciparum infection, N=3), 69 patients were diagnosed with P. vivax infection and 3 were diagnosed with P. falciparum infection by LG Advansure™ Malaria P.f./P.v. real-time QPCR. Both the tests indicated absence of infection in the 100 healthy subjects. The detection limit of LG Advansure™ Malaria P.f./P.v. real-time QPCR was 0.1 parasite/µL.
Figures and Tables
References
1. Sinden R, Gilles H. Warrell DA, Gilles HM, editors. The malaria parasites. Essential malariology. 2002. 4th ed. London: Arnold;8.
2. Gama BE, Silva-Pires Fdo E, Lopes MN, Cardoso MA, Britto C, Torres KL, et al. Real-time PCR versus conventional PCR for malaria parasite detection in low-grade parasitemia. Exp Parasitol. 2007. 116:427–432.
3. Park J, Shin ES, Woo JH, Kim Y, Bae I, Jang J, et al. Two cases of falciparum malaria with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Tuberc Respir Dis. 1998. 45:888–895.
4. Cho YH, Kwon SY, Seo DH, Kim SI. Transfusion-transmitted malaria in Korea-10 cases during 1997-2001. Korean J Blood Transfus. 2001. 12:263–270.
5. WHO. Guidelines for the treatment of malaria. 2010. 2nd ed. Geneva: WHO;10–11.
6. Amexo M, Tolhurst R, Barnish G, Bates I. Malaria misdiagnosis: effects on the poor and vulnerable. Lancet. 2004. 364:1896–1898.
7. Vo TK, Bigot P, Gazin P, Sinou V, De Pina JJ, Huynh DC, et al. Evaluation of a real-time PCR assay for malaria diagnosis in patients from Vietnam and in returned travellers. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007. 101:422–428.
8. Farcas GA, Zhong KJ, Mazzulli T, Kain KC. Evaluation of the RealArt Malaria LC real-time PCR assay for malaria diagnosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2004. 42:636–638.
9. Rougemont M, Van Saanen M, Sahli R, Hinrikson HP, Bille J, Jaton K. Detection of four Plasmodium species in blood from humans by 18S rRNA gene subunit-based and species-specific real-time PCR assays. J Clin Microbiol. 2004. 42:5636–5643.
10. Hanscheid T, Grobusch MP. How useful is PCR in the diagnosis of malaria? Trends Parasitol. 2002. 18:395–398.
12. Lim HS, Kim HS. Evaluation of diagnostic methods of re-emerging malaria in Korean patients. Yonsei Med J. 2001. 42:84–90.
13. Snounou G, Viriyakosol S, Jarra W, Thaithong S, Brown KN. Identification of the four human malaria parasite species in field samples by the polymerase chain reaction and detection of a high prevalence of mixed infections. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1993. 58:283–292.
14. Calderaro A, Piccolo G, Zuelli C, Galati L, Ricci L, Perandin F, et al. Evaluation of a new plate hybridization assay for the laboratory diagnosis of imported malaria in Italy. New Microbiol. 2004. 27:163–171.
15. Mehlotra RK, Lorry K, Kastens W, Miller SM, Alpers MP, Bockarie M, et al. Random distribution of mixed species malaria infections in Papua New Guinea. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000. 62:225–231.