Journal List > Kosin Med J > v.29(2) > 1057017

Byun, Lee, Cho, Lee, Yeo, Kim, and Im: Increased carotid atherosclerosis and carotid artery stiffness according to the disease duration and activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Abstract

Objective:

The ᅵink among carotid intimamedia thickness (IMT), vascular elastic property and the disease activity of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is not well defined. We investigated the association between carotid atherosclerosis, elastic properties of the carotid arterial wall and clinical parameters of SLE.

Methods:

Fifty-one SLE patients and fifty healthy controls were included. Peak systolic global circumferential and posterior radial strains of carotid artery were measured to assess the elastic properties. Beta stiffness index was used as conventional method for the distensibility of the carotid artery. Information concerning SLE duration, cumulative dose of steroids and/or immunosuppressive drug intake was recorded, and SLE activity was assessed by SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) score.

Results:

Carotid plaques were more common in SLE patients. SLE patients with plaques were 㢌der and showed the increased mean ᅵMT, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs CRP), IgG anti-cardi㢌ipin antibody (aCL), and longer disease duration compared with those without plaques. Peaksyst㢌ic global circumferential and posterior radial strain as well β stiffness index were significantly lower in SLE group. Age, disease duration, hsCRP, IgG aCL showed significant correlations with mean ᅵMT and parameters of carotid elastic property (all P's<0.05).

Conclusions:

Carotid atherosclerosis was more common in SLE patients, and carotid arterial stiffness had significant correlation with disease duration, hsCRP and IgG aCL level. Speckle tracking strain imaging is a comparative method for the assessment of elastic properties of carotid artery of SLE patients.

REFERENCES

1.J. Wajed., Y. Ahmad., P.N. Durrington., Bruce IN. Prevention of cardiovascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus? proposed guidelines for risk management. Rheumatology. 2004. 43:7–12.
2.Manzi S., Meilahn EN., Rairie JE., Conte CG., Medsger TA Jr., Jansen-McWilliams L, et al. Age-specific incidence rates of myocardial infarction and angina in women with systemic lupus erythematosus: comparison with the Framingham Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1997. 145:408–15.
crossref
3.Roman MJ., Shanker BA., Davis A., Lockshin MD., Sammaritano L., Simantov R, et al. Prevalence and correlates of accelerated atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med. 2003. 349:2399–406.
crossref
4.Bjomadal L., Yin L., Granath F., Klareskog L., Ekborn A. Cardiovascular disease a hazard despite improved prognosis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: results from a Swedish population based study. J Rheumatol. 2004. 31:713–9.
5.Tassiulas IO., Boumpas DT. Textbook of Rheumatology. 8th ed.p. 1429–51. Philadelphia, Saunders;2009.
6.Alam TA., Seifalian AM., Baker D. A review of methods currently used for assessment of in vivo endothelial function. Eur J Vase Endovasc Surg. 2005. 29:269–76.
crossref
7.Sohn IS., Lee JB., Cho BH., Park JH., Jin ES., Cho JM, et al. Carotid intimamedia thickness and arterial stiffness in hypertensive patients with first attack of ischemic stroke. J Korean Soc Hypertens. 2010. 16:14–21.
8.Hoeks AP., Brands PJ., Smeets FA., Reneman RS. Assessment of the distensibility of superficial arteries Ultrasound Med Biol. 1990. 16:121–8.
9.Selzer RH., Mack WJ., Lee PL., Kwong-Fu H., Hodis HN. Improved common carotid elasticity and intimamedia thickness measurements from computer analysis of sequential ultrasound frames. Atherosclerosis. 2001. 154:185–93.
crossref
10.El-Magdmi M., Bodill H., Ahmad Y., Durrington PN., Mackness M., Walker M, et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus. An independent risk factor for endothelial dysfunction in women. Circulation. 2004. 110:399–404.
11.Svenuungsson E., Jensen-Urstad K., Heimburger M., Silveira A., Hamsten A., de Faire U, et al. Risk factors for cardiovascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Circulation. 2001. 104:1887–93.
crossref
12.Greene ER., Lanphere KR., Sharrar J., Roldan CA. Arterial distensibility in systemic lupus erythematosus. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009. 2009:1109–12.
crossref
13.Cacciapaglia F., Zardi EM., Coppolino G., Buzzelini F., Margiotta D., Arcarese L, et al. Stiffness parameters, intimamedia thickness and early atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Lupus. 2009. 18:249–56.
crossref
14.Barenbrock M., Kosch M., Joster E., Kisters K., Rahn KH., Hausberg M. Reduced arterial distensibility is a predictor of cardiovascular disease in patients after renal transplantation. J Hypertens. 2002. 20:79–84.
crossref
15.Van Popele NM., Grobbee DE., Bots ML., Asmar R., Topouchian J., Reneman RS, et al. Association between arterial stiffness and atherosclerosis: the Rotterdam Study. Stroke. 2001. 32:454–60.
16.Harloff A., Strecker C., Reinhard M., Kollum M., Handke M., Olschewski M, et al. Combined measurement of carotid stiffness and intimamedia thickness improves prediction of complex aortic plaques in pa仕ents with ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2006. 37:2708–12.
17.Manzi S. Systemic lupus erythematosus; a model for atherogenesis? Rheumatology. 2000. 39:353–9.
crossref
18.Ames PR., Margarita A., Alves JD. Antiphospholipid antibodies and atherosclerosis: insights from systemic lupus erythematosus and primary antiphospholipid syndrome. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2009. 37:29–35.
crossref
19.Bots ML., Dijk JM., Oren A., Grobbee DE. Carotid intimamedia thickness, arterial stiffness and risk of cardiovascular disease: current evidence. J Hypertens. 2002. 20:2317–25.
20.Greenland P., Abrams J., Aurigemma GP., Bond MG., Clark LT., Criqui MH, et al. Prevention Conference V: Beyond secondary prevention: identifying the high-risk patient for primary prevention: noninvasive tests of atherosclerotic burden: Writing Group III. Circulation. 2000. 101:E16–22.
21.de Leeuw K., Smit AJ., de Groot E., van Roon AM., Kallenberg CG, Bijl M. Longitudinal study on premature atherosclerosis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Atherosclerosis. 2009. 206:546–50.
crossref
22.Manzi S., Selzer F., Sutton-Tyrrell K., Fitzgerald SG., Rairie JE., Tracy RP, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of carotid plaque in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1999. 42:51–60.
crossref
23.Roman MJ., Shanker BA., Davis A., Lockshin MD., Sammaritano L., Simantov R, et al. Prevalence and correlates of accelerated atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med. 2003. 349:2399–406.
crossref
24.Gilman G., Khandheria BK., Hagen ME., Abraham TP., Seward JB., Belohlavek M. Strain rate and strain: a step-by-step approach to image and data acquisition. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004. 17:1011–20.
crossref
25.Laurent S., Boutouyne P., Lacolley P. Structural and genetic bases of arterial stiffness. Hypertension. 2005. 45:1050–5.
crossref
26.Golemati S., Sassano A., Lever MJ., Bharath AA., Dhanjil S., Nicolaides AN. Carotid artery wall motion estimated from B-mode ultrasound using region tracking and block matching. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003. 29:387–99.
crossref
27.Lee JH., Cho KI., Kim SM. Carotid arterial stiffness in pa仕ents with rheumatoid arthritis assessed by speckle tracking strain imaging: its association with carotid atherosclerosis Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012. 30:720–8.

Figure 1.
An automated tracking algorithm outlined the intima- media complex of common carotid artery (a). Systolic and diastolic diameters of common carotid artery were obtained from short axis view (b). Regions of interest with computation area of 1x1 mm were placed in the intimamedia complex from the short axis view of the common carotid artery (c and d). Peak systolic global circumferential strain (c) and posterior radial strain (d) and during systole were used for the analysis.
kmj-29-107f1.tif
Table 1.
Clinical characteristics and parameters of the carotid artery of the study population
  SLE patients (n=51) Control (n=50) P
Age, yrs 47.5 ± 14.0 51.3± 10.1 0.122
Female, n (%) 32 (62.7 %) 29 {58 %) 0.841
BMI, kg/m 22.1±5.9 22.4 ± 4.9 0.683
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg 118.ftt 11.5 121.9 ± HU) 0.182
Diastolit Dlood pressure, mmHg 7L3 ± 10.4 73.8 ± 7.3 0.124
Total cholesterol, mg/dl 189.3 ±24.7 185.8 ±28.7 0.452
Mean IMT, mm 0.71 ±0.16 0.63 ± 0.09 0.04.1
Plaque, n (%) 14(27.5%) 3 (6%) <0.001
stiffness (β) 4.07 ± 0.73 3.69 ±0.53 0.004
Distmsibilily 0.37 ±0.10 0.45 ± 0.08 0.015
Conventional Strain, % 9.01±4.80 12.38 ± 5.52 0.002
Peak systolic global circumferential strain, % 3.61 ±1.25 6.23 ± 1.78 <0.001
Peak systolic posterior radial strain, % -3.96 ± 1.26 -4.75 ± 1.55 0.007

All values are presented as the mean ± SD

BMI body mass index, SLE systemic lupus erythematous, IMT intimamedia thickness

Table 2.
Characteristics of SLE patients with and without carotid arterial plaque
  SLE patients with plaques (0=14) SLE patients without plaques (n=37) P
Age, yrs 50.8 ± 14.1 45.6 ± 14.5 0.045
Disease duration, yis 9.23 ±4.34 4.64 ± 4.46 0.002
Total cholesterol, mg/dl 199.7 ±24.5 193.6 ±28.1 0.382
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg 113.8 ±7.6 11 ± 15.2 0.961
Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg 71.6 ± 6.4 71.2± 11.6 0.855
C-reactive proldn, mmol/L 4.01 ±5.62 0.47 ±0.57 <0.001
SLEDAI 4.93 ±4.42 6.35 ±6.53 0.421
Anti-dsDNA Ig G 27.9±51.9 23.6±50.5 0.794
Anti-dsDNA lgM 26.3±34.8 15.5±10,8 0.103
Anti Sm 20.2±56.2 20.5±65.8 0.984
Anti Ro 137.1±235.9 109.1 ± 188.9 0.665
Anti La 40.2±90.3 25.58±13.0 0.081
C3 98.7±58.6 70.2±52.5 0.126
C4 27.7 ± 16.1 18.9±12.2 0.064
Ig G aCI, 26.1 ±57.1 4.91 ± 10.8 0.0.16
Ig Μ aCI, 4.82±5.39 4.98±15.0 0.956
Mean IMT, mm 1.09±0.13 0.68 ±0,16 0.039
stiffness (β) 8..12 ± 7.32 3.iW±0.67 0.024
distensibility 0.3 2± 0.07 0.39±0.11 0.010
Conventional Strain, % 8.71 ±4,85 9.80 ±4.75 <0.001
Peak systolic global circumferential strain, % 2.90 ± 1.02 3.88 ± 1.22 0.008
Peak systolic posterior radial strain, % -3.42±0.94 -4.17 ± 132 0.0.11

All values are presented as the mean ± SD

SLE systemic lupus erythematous, SLEDAI Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index, anti-dsDNA

Ab anti-double stranded DNA antibodies aCL anti-cardiolipin antibody, IMT intimamedia thickness

Table 3.
Correlation coefficients between the parameters of carotid artery and clinical parameters of SLE group (n=51)
  Mean IMT Beta stiffness index Distensibiljty
  r P r P r P
Agc 0.33 0.018 0.37 0.004 -0.22 0.037
Disease duration 0.43 0.002 0.24 0.023 -0.23 0.031
Systolic blood pressure 0.05 0.758 -0.19 0.171 -0.20 0.156
Diastolic blood pressure -0.03 0.863 0.07 0.951 >0.11 0.58
Total cholesterol 0.04 0.643 0.01 0.873 -0.10 0.37
hs CRP 0.49 <0.001 0.38 0.003 -0.26 0.008
IgG aCL 0.31 0.034 0.33 0.018 -0.17 0.102
SLEDAI 0.13 0.248 0.22 0.066 -0.11 0.297
  Peak systolic global circumferential strain Peak systolic posterior radial strain
  r P r P
Age -0.30 0.045 0.39 0.004
Disease duration -0.32 0.011 0.38 <0.001
Systolit blood pressure -0.31 0.030 0.37 0.008
Diaslolic blood pressure -0.17 0.232 0.23 0.111
Total cholesterol -0.12 0.325 0.19 0.254
hs CRP -0.23 0.035 0.27 0.027
IgG aCL -0.23 0.021 0.32 0.003
SLEDAI -0.19 0.372 0.17 0.298

IMT intimamedia thickness, hs CRP high sensitivity C-reactive protein, aCL anti-cardiolipin antibody, SLEDAI Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index.

Table 4.
Multiple linear regression analysis of mean IMT and parameters of arterial stiffness of common carotid artery in SLE groups.
  Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Coefficient(β) P R2 Coefficient(β) P
Age 0.374 0.003 0.140 0.134 0.048
Disease duraiiun 0.257 0,072 0.066 0,110 0,035
Systolic blood pressure 0.046 0.753 0.002 0.041 ϋ.861
Diastolic blood pressure. -0.025 0.803 0 細 0.027 0.902
Total cholesterol 0.068 0.165 0.002 0.067 0.497
hsCRP 0.458 <0.001 0.209 0.486 0.004
SLEDAI 0.232 0.007 0.054 0.350 0.384
IgG aCL 0.094 0.516 0.009 -0.072 0.679
Mean IMT (R2 = 0.297, adjusted R2 = 0.143 in multivariute analysis)
Age 0.202 0.023 0.162 0,233 0.037
Disease duralion 0.433 0,002 0.188 0,454 0.033
Systolic blood pressure -0.005 0.421 0.000 0.075 0.716
Diastolic blood pressure, 0.021 0.033 0.000 0.052 0.800
Total cholesterol 0.104 0.471 0.011 0.038 0.693
hsCRP 0.480 >0.001 0.23 L 0.370 0.003
SLEDAJ 0.117 0.472 0.014 0.289 0.058
IgG aCL 0.298 0.086 0.089 0.167 0.513
Presence of plaque (R20.464, adjusted R2=0.347 in mullivariale analysis)
Age -0.285 0.045 0.081 -0.210 0.212
Disease ckiraiion -0.307 0.030 0.039 -0.410 0.008
Systolic blood pressure -0.172 0.232 0.030 -0.025 0.907
Diastolic blood pressure. -0.196 0.172 0.094 -0.393 0.067
Total cholcstcrol -0.120 0.238 0.014 -0.061 0.523
lisCRP -0.020 0.889 0.000 -0.192 0.262
SLEDAI -0.188 0.245 0.035 0.270 0.083
IgG aCL -0.046 0.75] 0.002 0.013 0.890
Peak systolic global circumferential strain(R2=0.442, adjusted R2=0.320 in multivariate Einalysis)
Age 0.433 <0.001 0.188 0.081 0.650
Disease duralion 0.156 0.281 0.024 0.208 0.045
Systolic bltxxi pressure. 0.197 0.185 0.039 0.274 0.231
Diastolic blood pressure, 0.009 0.952 0.000 -0.173 0.442
Total cholesterol 0.150 0.299 0.022 0.019 0.844
hsCRP 0.123 0.395 0.015 0.052 0.775
SLEDAI 0.224 0.036 0.179 0.269 0.057
IgG aCL 0.332 0.078 0.110 0.189 0.375
Beta stiffness index (R”=0..159, adjusted R2 =0.219 in inultivarialc analysis)

hs CRP high sensitivity C-reactive protein, SLEDAI Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index, aCL anti-cardiolipin antibody.

TOOLS
Similar articles