Abstract
Objectives
This clinical study evaluated the effect of light activation on the whitening efficacy and safety of in-office bleaching system containing 15% hydrogen peroxide gel.
Materials and Methods
Thirty-three volunteers were randomly treated with (n = 17, experimental group) or without light activation (n = 16, control group), using Zoom2 white gel (15% H2O2, Discus Dental) for a total treatment time of 45 min. Visual and instrumental color measurements were obtained using Vitapan Classical shade guide and Shadepilot (DeguDent) at screening test, after bleaching, and 1 month and 3 month after bleaching. Data were analyzed using t-test, repeated measure ANOVA, and chi-squared test.
Results
Zoom2 white gel produced significant shade changes in both experimental and control group when pre-treatment shade was compared with that after bleaching. However, shade difference between two groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Tooth shade relapse was not detected at 3 months after bleaching. The incidence of transient tooth sensitivity was 39.4%, with being no differences between two groups.
Figures and Tables
References
2. Kim SY, Park JU, Kim CH, Yang SE. A clinical evaluation of efficacy of an office bleaching gel containing 30% hydrogen peroxide. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2010. 35:40–50.
3. Kim SY, Park JU, Kim CH, Yang SE. A clinical evaluation of safety of an office bleaching gel containing 30% hydrogen peroxide. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2010. 35:198–210.
5. Sulieman M, Addy M, MacDonald E, Rees JS. The effect of hydrogen peroxide concentration on the outcome of tooth whitening: an in vitro study. J Dent. 2004. 32:295–299.
6. Calatayud JO, Calatayud CO, Zaccagnini AO, Box MJ. Clinical efficacy of a bleaching system based on hydrogen peroxide with or without light activation. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2010. 5:216–224.
7. Ontiveros JC, Paravina RD. Color change of vital teeth exposed to bleaching performed with and without supplementary light. J Dent. 2009. 37:840–847.
8. Lehmann KM, Igiel C, Schmidtmann I, Scheller H. Four color-measuring devices compared with a spector-phtometric reference system. J Dent. 2010. 38:Suppl 2. e65–e70.
9. Park JH, Shin HJ, Park DY, Park SH, Kim JW, Cho KM. Effect of the bleaching light on whitening efficacy. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2009. 34:95–102.
11. American Dental Association Council of Scientific Affairs. Acceptance program guidelines: professional in-office tooth bleaching products. 2006. Chicago: ADA.
12. Gross MD, Moser JB. A colorimetric study of coffee and tea staining of four composite resins. J Oral Rehabil. 1977. 4:311–322.
13. Asmussen E. An accelerated test for color stability of restorative resins. Acta Odontol Scand. 1981. 39:329–332.
14. Douglas RD, Steinhauer TJ, Wee AG. Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch. J Prosthet Dent. 2007. 97:200–208.
15. American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. Tooth whitening/bleaching: treatment considerations for dentists and their patients. 2009. Chicago: ADA.
16. Kugel G, Papathanasiou A, Williams AJ 3rd, Anderson C, Ferreira S. Clinical evaluation of chemical and light-activated tooth whitening systems. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2006. 27:54–62.
17. Buchalla W, Attin T. External bleaching therapy with activation by heat, light or laser--a systematic review. Dent Mater. 2007. 23:586–596.
18. Baik JW, Rueggeberg FA, Liewehr FR. Effect of light-enhanced bleaching on in vitro surface and intrapulpal temperature rise. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2001. 13:370–378.
19. Kivanç BH, Arisu HD, Ulusoy Öx00EC;A, Saglam BC, Görgül G. Effect of light-activated bleaching on pulp chamber temperature rise: an in vitro study. Aust Endod J. 2011. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2010.00271.x.