Journal List > J Korean Acad Conserv Dent > v.35(4) > 1056424

Lee, Shin, Hong, Song, Chang, and Min: Root canal treatment of a mandibular second premolar with three separate root canals

Abstract

Mandibular premolars show a wide variety of root canal anatomy. Especially, the occurrence of three canals with three separate foramina in mandibular second premolars is very rare. This case report describes the root canal treatment of an unusual morphological configuration of the root canal system and supplements previous reports of the existence of such configuration in mandibular second premolar.

I. Introduction

Successful root canal treatment requires an understanding of root canal morphology and anatomy. Accurate diagnosis of root canal morphology and anatomy is essential for thorough shaping and cleaning of the entire root canal system and consequent successful root canal treatment.1) Mandibular premolars show a wide variety of root canal anatomy.2) There seems to be a racial predisposition for the presence of two or more canals in maxillary and mandibular premolars, as well as their bilateral occurrence.2,3) Especially, the occurrence of three canals with three separate foramina in mandibular premolars is very rare. Vertucci4) and Zillich et al5) reported the occurrence of three canals in mandibular first premolars at 0.5% and 0.4% respectively. Their studies in second premolars showed these percentages at 0.0% and 0.4%, respectively. To our knowledge, however, there is rare case report about treatment of mandibular second premolar with three separate canals divided at the apical level of the root whereas most previous reports showed that the orifices were found in the mid root section.6) The present case report describes the root canal treatment of a mandibular second premolar having three independent root canals with separate foramina.

II. Case Report

A 27-year-old man with a noncontributory medical history was referred because of occasionally slight spontaneous pain in the mandibular left second premolar. The tooth was diagnosed as irreversible pulpitis and initiated to have root canal treatment by general dentist 2 days ago, but could not negotiate all of the root canals. After this treatment, the initial acute symptom had been relieved, but the tooth was still symptomatic and tender to percussion. A radiographic image of the tooth showed an unusual anatomy of these teeth (Figure 1). According to clinical and radiographic examination, a diagnosis of pulp necrosis with apical periodontitis was made.
The tooth was anaesthetized, isolated with rubber dam and temporary filling was removed. The apical third was explored to locate the canal orifices using the operating microscope (OPMI Pico Dental Microscope; Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Three separated root canal orifices were found on the same level of the pulp chamber floor at a depth of 14.0 mm: one lingual, one distobuccal, and one mesiobuccal. Each canal had separate portal of exit. The working lengths of root canals were determined using an electronic apex locator (Root ZX; J Morita Inc., Kyoto, Japan) and then verified by a radiograph (Figure 2). The working lengths of three canals were same as 19.0 mm. In addition, endodontic ultrasonic tips (CPR tips; Spartan, Fenton, MO, USA) were used to achieve better straight-line access. Small, slightly pre-curved K-files were used to debride the canals and to establish a glide path to the working length. The canals were cleaned and shaped using nickel titanium rotary instrument (Protaper Universal; Dentsply-Mailiefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). After drying the canals with paper points, all canals were obturated with warm gutta-percha technique with AH 26 (Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany) root canal sealer (Figure 3). A post-operative radiograph showed separate three root canals (Figure 4).

III. Discussion

In this case, the mandibular second premolar with three root canals could be treated successfully using a non-surgical method. The possibility of variations in root canal morphology must be considered before root canal treatment is undertaken.7) Careful interpretation of the root outline and the periodontal ligament space may suggest the presence of an extra root or canal.8) During the initial placement of scouting files in the assumptive site as canal orifice, clinicians may encounter an obstruction and the files may deflect to the buccal, lingual, mesial or distal before it travels any further. This may indicate a canal division. Therefore, it is important to develop a sense of tactile feeling and direction with appropriate precurved scouting files to detect the multiple canal orifices.
When working under the microscope, clinicians can see the sodium hypochlorite bubbling in the extra canal, marking its presence. Furthermore, once it has been established that there are three canals, it is important to obtain straight-line access to all canals. This may be achieved by ultrasonic tips, which reduce stress on the files used subsequently to shape the canals and minimize the risk of instrument separation and canal transportation.
In this case, tooth had the C-shaped canal shape as category II9) of the mesiobuccal and ligual distinct canal. Extravagant use of small files and sodium hypochlorite is a key to thorough debridement of narrow canal isthmus. Despite the existence of complicated dental anatomy, shaping outcomes with nickel-titanium rotary files prepares the canals to a predetermined shape. Furthermore, warm gutta-percha filling technique has shown to allow the creation of excellent adaptation of filling material to root canals.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1
Preoperative periapical radiograph of mandibular left second premolar.
jkacd-35-302-g001
Figure 2
The radiograph of working length measurement demonstrating three root canals. The H-file was inserted in the lingual canal.
jkacd-35-302-g002
Figure 3
Microscopic views of the furcation area and the root canal orifices following obturation.
jkacd-35-302-g003
Figure 4
Post-operative radiograph showing obturation of the root canal system.
jkacd-35-302-g004

References

1. England MC, Hartwell GR, Lance JK. Detection and treatment of multiple canals in mandibular premolars. J Endod. 1991. 17:174–178.
crossref
2. Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CC. The root and root canal morphology of the human mandibular second premolar: a literature review. J Endod. 2007. 33:1031–1037.
crossref
3. Trope M, Elfenbein L, Tronstad L. Mandibular premolars with more than one root canal in different race groups. J Endod. 1986. 12:343–345.
crossref
4. Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology of mandibular premolars. J Am Dent Assoc. 1978. 97:47–50.
crossref
5. Zillich R, Dowson J. Root canal morphology of mandibular first and second premolars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1973. 36:738–744.
crossref
6. Nallapati S. Three canal mandibular first and second premolars: a treatment approach. J Endod. 2005. 31:474–476.
7. Slowey RR. Root canal anatomy. Road map to successful endodontics. Dent Clin North Am. 1979. 23:555–573.
8. Slowey RR. Radiographic aids in the detection of extra root canal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1974. 37:762–772.
9. Melton DC, Krell KV, Fuller MW. Anatomical and histological features of C-shaped canals in mandibular second molars. J Endod. 1991. 17:384–388.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles