Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to compare the influence of post-surface treatment with silane, hydrogen peroxide, hydrofluoric acid or sandblasting and to investigate the effect of silane in combination of the other treatments on the microtensile bond strength between fiber posts and composite resins for core build-up. Thirty-two glass-fiber posts (FRC Postec Plus, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) were divided into eight groups according to the different surface pretreatments performed: silane application (S); immersion in 28% hydrogen peroxide (HP); immersion in hydrogen peroxide followed by application of silane (HP-S); immersion in 4% hydrofluoric acid gel (HF); immersion in hydrofluoric acid gel followed by application of silane (HF-S); sandblasting with aluminum oxide particles (SB); sandblasting followed by application of silane (SB-S). In control group, no surface treatment was performed. The composite resin (Tetric Flow, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) was applied onto the posts to produce the composite cylinder specimen. It was sectioned into sticks to measure the microtensile bond strength. The data was analyzed with one-way ANOVA and LSD test for post hoc comparison (p < 0.05). Post pretreatment with sandblasting enhanced the interfacial strength between the fiber posts and core materials. Moreover, sand-blasting followed by application of silane appears to be the most effective method that can improve the clinical performance of glass fiber posts.
Figures and Tables
References
1. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-codoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent. 2000. 13(Spec No):15B–18B.
2. Kim MH, Kim HJ, Cho YG. Effect of curing methods of resin cements on bond strength and adhesive interface of post. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2009. 34(2):103–112.
3. Pegoretti A, Fambrai L, Zappini G, Bianchetti M. Finite element analysis of a glass fiber reinforced composite endodontic post. Biomaterials. 2002. 23:2667–2682.
4. Lee HA, Cho YG. Comparison of bond strength of a fiber post cemented with various resin cements. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2008. 33(6):499–506.
5. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent. 2000. 13:9B–13B.
6. Monticelli F, Grandini S, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Clinical behavior of translucent fiber post: a 2-year prospective study. Int J Prosthodont. 2003. 16:593–596.
7. Shin SI, Shin DH. A study on the material properties of various composite resins for core build-up. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2004. 29(2):191–199.
8. Vano M, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Tognini F, Gabriele M, Tay FR. The adhesion between fibre posts and composite resin cores: the evaluation of microtensile bond strength following various surface chemical treatments to posts. Int Endod J. 2006. 39:31–39.
9. Aksornmuang J, Foxton RM, Nakajima M, Tagami J. Microtensile bond strength of a dual-cure resin core material to glass and quartz fibre posts. J Dent. 2004. 32:443–450.
10. Monticelli F, Goracci C, Grandini S, Garcia-Godoy F, Ferrari M. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of fiber post-resin core units built up with different resin composites. Am J Dent. 2005. 18:61–65.
11. Goracci C, Raffaelli O, Monticelli F, Balleri P, Bertelli E, Ferrari M. The adhesion between fiber posts and composite resin cores: Microtensile bond strength with and without post silanization. Dent Mater. 2005. 21(5):437–444.
12. Aksornmuang J, Foxton RM, Nakajima M, Tagami J. Microtensile bond strength of a dual-cure resin core material to glass and quartz fibre posts. J Dent. 2004. 32:443–450.
13. Perdigao J, Gomes G, Lee IK. The effect of silane on the bond strength of fiber posts. Dent Mater. 2006. 22(8):752–758.
14. Bitter K, Noetzel J, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Effect of silanization on bond strength of fiber posts to various resin cements. Quintessence Int. 2007. 38(2):121–128.
15. Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K. Bond strength of resin cement to dentin and to surface-treated posts of titanium alloy, glass fiber, and zirconia. J Adhes Dent. 2003. 5:153–162.
16. Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K. Effect of surface treatment of prefabricated posts on bonding of resin cement. Oper Dent. 2004. 29:60–68.
17. Valandro LF, Yoghiga S, de Melo RM, Galhano GA, Mallmann A, Marinho CP, Bottino MA. Microntensile bond strength between a quartz fiber post and a resin cement: effect of post surface conditioning. J Adhes Dent. 2006. 8:105–111.
18. Baldissara P, Zicari F, Valandro LF, Scotti R. Effect of root canal treatments on quartz fibre posts bonding to root dentin. J Endod. 2006. 32:985–988.
19. Perdigao J, Gomes G, Lee IK. The effect of silane on the bond strengths of fiber posts. Dent Mater. 2006. 22:752–758.
20. Pirani C, Cberasoni S, Foscbi F, Piana G, Lousbine RJ, Tay FR, Prati C. Does hybridization of intraradicular dentin really improve fiber post retention in endodontically treated teeth. J Endod. 2005. 31:891–894.
21. Monticelli F, Grandini S, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Clinical behavior of translucent- fiber posts: a 2-year prospective study. Int J Prosthodont. 2003. 16:593–596.
22. Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Cury AH, Coniglio I, Vulicevic ZR, Garcia-Godoy F, Ferrari M. The effect of sandblasting on adhesion of a dual-cured resin composite to methacrylate fiber posts: microtensile bond strength and SEM evaluation. J Dent. 2007. 35:496–502.
23. Balbosh A, Kern M. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2006. 95:218–223.
24. Magni E, Mazzitelli C, Papacchini F, Radovic I, Goracci C, Coniglio I, Ferrari M. Adhesion between fiber posts and resin luting agents: a microtensile bond strength test and an SEM investigation following different treatments of the post surface. J Adhes Dent. 2007. 9:195–202.
25. Valandro LF, Ozcan M, Bottino MC, Bottino MA, Scotti R, Bona AD. Bond strength of a resin cement to high-alumina and zirconia-reinforced ceramics: the effect of surface conditioning. J Adhes Dent. 2006. 8:175–181.