PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the microshear bond strength of a self-etching primer adhesive to dentin prepared with different diamond points, carbide burs and SiC papers, and also to determine which SiC paper yield similar strength to that of dentinal surface prepared with points or burs.
Fifty-six human molar were sectioned to expose the occlusal dentinal surfaces of crowns and slabs of 1.2 mm thick were made. Dentinal surfaces were removed with three diamond points, two carbide burs, and three SiC papers. They were divided into one of eight equal groups (n = 7); Group 1: standard diamond point(TF-12), Group 2: fine diamond point (TF-12F), Group 3: extrafine diamond point (TF-12EF), Group 4: plain-cut carbide bur (no. 245), Group 5: cross-cut carbide bur (no. 557), Group 6 : P 120-grade SiC paper, Group 7: P 220-grade SiC paper, Group 8: P 800-grade SiC paper.
Clearfil SE Bond was applied on dentinal surface and Clearfil AP-X was placed on dentinal surface using Tygon tubes. After the bonded specimens were subjected to uSBS testing, the mean uSBS (n = 20 for each group) was statistically compared using one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD test.
In conclusion, the use of extrafine diamond point is recommended for improved bonding of Clearfil SE Bond to dentin. Also the use of P 220-grade SiC paper in vitro will be yield the results closer to dentinal surface prepared with fine diamond point or carbide burs in vivo.
Figures and Tables
Table 2
Mean microshear bond strength (MPa) to dentin
G1: Standard diamond, G2: Fine diamond, G3: Extrafine diamond,G4: Cross-cut carbide bur, G5: Plain-cut carbide bur, G6: P 120-grade SiC paper, G7: P 220-grade SiC paper, G8: P 800-grade SiC paper. Superscripts of the other letter indicate values of statistically significant difference by Tukey HSD statistics
References
1. Kiremitci A, Yalcin F, Gokalp S. Bonding to enamel and dentin using self-etching adhesive systems. Quintessence Int. 2004. 35:367–370.
2. Cho YG, Cho KC. Marginal microleakage of self-etching primer adhesives and a self-etching adhesive. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2002. 27:493–501.
3. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater. 2001. 17:296–308.
4. Gregoire G, Millas A. Microscopic evaluation of dentin interface obtained with 10 contemporary self-etching systems: Correlation with their pH. Oper Dent. 2005. 30:481–491.
5. Tay FR, Carvalho R, Sano H, Pashley DH. Effect of smear layers on the bonding of a self-etching primer to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2000. 2:99–116.
6. Prati C, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi R. Resin-infiltrated dentin layer formation of new bonding systems. Oper Dent. 1998. 23:185–194.
7. Kubo S, Yokota H, Sata Y, Hayashi Y. Microleakage of self-etching primers after thermal and flexural load cycling. Am J Dent. 2001. 14:163–169.
8. Shimada Y, Iwamoto N, Kawashima M, Burrow MF, Tagami J. Shear bond strength of current asdheisve systems to enamel, dentin and dentin-enamel junction region. Oper Dent. 2003. 28:585–590.
9. Koibuchi H, Yasuda N, Nakabayashi N. Bonding to dentin with a self-etching primer: the effect of smear layers. Dent Mater. 2001. 17:122–126.
10. Toledano M, Osorio R, De Leonardi G, Rosales-Leal J, Ceballos L, Cabererizo-Vilchez MA. Influence of self-etching primer on the resin adhesion to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent. 2001. 14:205–210.
11. Ishioka S, Caputo AA. Interaction between the dentinal smear layer and composite bond strength. J Prosthet Dent. 1989. 61:180–185.
12. Ogata M, Harada N, Yamaguchi S, Nakajima M, Tagami J. Effect of self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid etchant on bonding to bur-prepared dentin. Oper Dent. 2002. 27:447–454.
13. Tao L, Pashley DH, Boyd L. Effect of different types of smear layers on dentin and enamel shear bond strengths. Dent Mater. 1988. 4:208–216.
14. Kim YH, Park JG, Cho YG. Effect of microleakage of a self-etching primer adhesive according to types of cutting instruments. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2007. 32:327–334.
15. Lee MG, Cho KH, Cho YG. Microleakage of 2-step adhesive systems in diamond-prepared cavity. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2007. 32:437–444.
16. Sekimoto T, Derkson GD, Richardson AS. Effect of cutting instruments on permeability and morphology of the dentin surface. Oper Dent. 1999. 24:130–136.
17. Toida T, Watanabe A, Nakabayashi N. Effect of smear layer on bonding to dentin prepared with bur. The J Japanese Society for Dent Materials and Devices. 1995. 14:109–116.
18. Dias WR, Pereira PN, Swift Ed Jr. Effect of bur types on microtensile bond strengths of self-etching systems to human dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2004. 6:195–203.
19. Ogata M, Harada N, Yamaguchi S, Nakajima M, Pereria PNR, Tagami J. Effect of different burs on dentin bond strengths of self-etching primer bonding systems. Oper Dent. 2001. 26:375–382.
20. Hosoya Y, Shinkawa H, Suefiji C, Nozaka K, Garcia-Gody F. Effects of diamond bur particle size on dentin bond strength. Am J Dent. 2004. 17:359–364.
21. Koase K, Inoue S, Noda M, Tanaka T, Kawamoto C, Takahashi A, Nakaoki Y, Sano H. Effect of bur-cut dentin on bond strnegth using all-in-one and two-step adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent. 2004. 6:97–104.
22. Ayad MF, Rosenstiel SF, Hassan MM. Surface roughness of dentin after tooth preparation with different rotary instrumentation. J Prosthet Dent. 1996. 75:122–128.
23. Roberson TM, Heymann H, Swift Jr EJ. Sturdevants Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 2002. 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, Inc.;340–341.
24. Tagami J, Tao L, Pashley DH, Hosoda H, Sano H. Effect of high-speed cutting on dentin permeability and bonding. Dent Mater. 1991. 7:234–239.
25. Bouillaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha JC, Ciucchi B, Cattani M, Godin CH, Meyer JM. Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventinal, one-step, and self-etching adhesive systems. J Dent. 2001. 29:55–61.
26. Oliveira SSA, Pugach MK, Hilton JF, Watanabe LG, Marshall SJ, Marshall Jr GW. The influence of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: a self-etching primer vs. a total-etch system. Dent Mater. 2003. 19:758–767.
XML Download