PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate endodontic irrigation methods with EndoVac® and EndoActivator® in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from the root canals. Extracted 70 human single-rooted teeth were used. The canals were instrumented by a crown-down technique with .04 taper ProFile to ISO size 40. After the teeth were autoclaved, the canals were inoculated with E. faecalis and incubated for 48 h. The teeth were randomly divided into three experimental groups of 20 teeth each according to canal irrigation methods and two control groups as follows: group 1 - EndoVac®; group 2 - EndoActivator®; group 3 - Conventional needle irrigation method. After canal irrigation using 2.5% NaOCl, first samples (S1) were taken using sterile paper point. And the canals were filled with sterile brain heart infusion (BHI) broth and incubated for 24 h, then second samples (S2) were taken. The samples were cultured on BHI agar plate to determine the numbers of colony forming units (CFU). In first sampling (S1), only one canal of conventional method among the all experimental groups was positive cultured. In second sampling (S2), EndoVac® group showed the least positive culture numbers of E. faecalis. There was statistically significant difference between the EndoVac® and conventional needle irrigation methods in the mean value of Log CFU. According to the results of this study, EndoVac® showed better efficacy than conventional needle irrigation method in the elimination of E. faecalis from the root canal.
참고문헌
1. Kakehashi S, Stanley HR, Fitzgerald RJ. The effects of surgical exposure of dental pulps in germ-free and conventional laboratory rats. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol. 20:340–348. 1965.
2. Sjogren U, Figdor D, Spangberg L, Sundqvist G. The antimicrobial effect of calcium hydroxide as a short-term intracanal dressing. Int Endod J. 24:119–125. 1991.
3. Bystrom A, Sundqvist G. Bacteriologic evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation in endodontic therapy. Scand J Dent Res. 89:321–328. 1981.
4. Wu MK, van der Sluis LW, Wesselink PR. The capability of two hand instrumentation techniques to remove the inner layer of dentine in oval canals. Int Endod J. 36:218–224. 2003.
5. Chow TW. Mechanical effectiveness of root canal irrigation. J Endod. 9:475–479. 1983.
6. Salzgeber RM, Brilliant JD. An in vivo evaluation of the penetration of an irrigating solution in root canals. J Endod. 3:394–398. 1977.
7. Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Efficacy of three techniques in cleaning the apical portion of curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 79:492–496. 1995.
8. Heard F, Walton RE. Scanning electron microscope study comparing four root canal preparation techniques in small curved canals. Int Endod J. 30:323–331. 1997.
9. Gutarts R, Nusstein J, Reader A, Beck M. In vivo debridement efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation following hand rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars. J Endod. 31:166–170. 2005.
10. McGill S, Gulabivala K, Mordan N, Ng YL. The efficacy of dynamic irrigation using a commercially available system (RinsEndo�) determined by removal of a colla-gen‘bio-molecular film’from an ex vivo model. Int Endod J. 41:602–608. 2008.
11. Hauser V, Braun A, Frentzen M. Penetration depth of a dye marker into dentine using a novel hydrodynamic system (RinsEndo�). Int Endod J. 40:644–652. 2007.
12. Siqueira JF Jr, Machado AG, Silveira RM, Lopes HP, de Uzeda M. Evaluation of the effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite used with three irrigation methods in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from the root canal, in vitro. Int Endod J. 30:279–282. 1997.
13. Clegg MS, Vertucci FJ, Walker C, Belanger M, Britto LR. The effect of exposure to irrigant solutions on apical dentin biofilms in vitro. J Endod. 32:434–437. 2006.
14. Dunavant TR, Regan JD, Glickman GN, Solomon ES, Honeyman AL. Comparative evaluation of endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms. J Endod. 32:527–531. 2006.
15. Pashley EL, Birdsong NL, Bowman K, Pashley DH. Cytotoxic effects of NaOCl on vital tissue. J Endod. 11:525–528. 1985.
16. Gatot A, Arbelle J, Leiberman A, Yanai-Inbar I. Effects of sodium hypochlorite on soft tissues after its inadvertent injection beyond the root apex. J Endod. 17:573–574. 1991.
17. Gernhardt CR, Eppendorf K, Kozlowski A, Brandt M. Toxicity of concentrated sodium hypochlorite used as an endodontic irrigant. Int Endod J. 37:272–280. 2004.
18. Schoeffel GJ. The EndoVac method of endodontic irrigation, Part 2- Efficacy. Dent Today. 26:82–87. 2008.
19. Fukumoto Y, Kikuchi I, Yoshioka T, Kobayashi C, Suda H. An ex vivo evaluation of a new root canal irrigation technique with intracanal aspiration. Int Endod J. 39:93–99. 2006.
20. Bystrom A, Claesson R, Sundqvist G. The antibacterial effect of camphorated paramonochlorophenol, camphorated phenol and calcium hydroxide in the treatment of infected root canals. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1:170–175. 1985.
21. Fidgor D, Davies JK, Sundqvist G. Starvation survival, growth and recovery of Enterococcus faecalis in human serum. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 18:234–239. 2003.
22. Jee SW, Kim ES, Jung IY, Yoo YJ. The effect of canal filling with gutta-percha or Resilon on Enterococcus faecalis in bovine dentinal tubules. Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry. 30:385–392. 2005.
23. Kim HJ, Park SH, Cho KM, Kim JW. Evaluation of time-dependent antimicrobial effect of sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC) on Enterococcus faecalis in the root canal. Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry. 32:121–128. 2007.
24. Albrecht LJ, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG. Evaluation of apical debris removal using various sizes and tapers of ProFile GT files. J Endod. 30:425–428. 2004.
25. Abou-Rass M, Piccinino MV. The effectiveness of four clinical irrigation methods on the removal of root canal debris. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 54:323–328. 1982.
26. Siqueira JF Jr, Arau、jo MCP, Garcia PF, Fraga RC, Dantas CJS. Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of root canals. J Endod. 23:499–502. 1997.
27. Usman AN, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG. Influence of instrument size on root canal debridement. J Endod. 30:110–112. 2004.
28. Schoeffel J, Sbeih W, Wallace J. Efficacy of a new endodontic irrigation method using negative pressure. Abstract 1593. Presented at IADR 83rd General Session. Baltimore, MD: March. p. 9–12. 2005.
29. Ram Z. Effectiveness of root canal irrigation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 44:306–312. 1977.
30. Hwang HK, Bae SC, Cho YL. The irrigating effect before and after coronal flaring. Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry. 28:72–79. 2003.
31. Nielsen BA, Baumgartner JC. Comparison of the EndoVac system to needle irrigation of root canals. J Endod. 33:611–615. 2007.
32. Ruddle CJ. Hydrodynamic disinfection: Tsunami Endodontics. Dent Today. 26:110112114–117. 2007.
33. Pitt WG. Removal of oral biofilm by sonic phenomena. Am J Dent. 18:345–352. 2005.
34. van der Sluis LWM, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. The evaluation of removal of calcium hydroxide paste from an artificial standardized groove in the apical root canal using different irrigation methodologies. Int Endod J. 40:52–57. 2007.
35. Kuruvilla JR, Kamath MP. Antimicrobial activity of 2.5% NaOCl and 0.2% CHX gluconate separately and combined, as endodontic irrigants. J Endod. 24:472–476. 1998.
Table 1.
Numbers of Positive cultures
| Irrigation method | N |
Positive Culture |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| (S1) | (S2) | ||
| EndoVac� | 20 | 0 (0%) | 3 (15%) |
| EndoActivator� | 20 | 0 (0%) | 8 (40%) |
| Conventional� | 20 | 1 (5%) | 13 (65%) |
Table 2.
Mean values of the quantity of bacterial cells in secondary sampling (S2)
| Irrigation method |
Colony Forming Units /ml (S2) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (CFU/ml) | Mean of LOG | ||
| EndoVac� | 0.99×105 | 0.87 | * |
| EndoActivator� | 2.06×105 | 1.81 | |
| Conventional | 4.12×105 | 2.90 | |
XML Download