Comparison of bond strength of a fiber post cemented with various resin cements

Hyun-A Lee; Young-Gon Cho

doi:10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.6.499

Journal List > J Korean Acad Conserv Dent > v.33(6) > 1056329

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Lee and Cho: Comparison of bond strength of a fiber post cemented with various resin cements

Original Article

Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry

Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2008; 33(6): 499-506.

Published online: 30 November 2008

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.6.499

Comparison of bond strength of a fiber post cemented with various resin cements

Hyun-A Lee, Young-Gon Cho

Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, Korea.

Corresponding Author: Young-Gon Cho. Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chosun University, 421 Seosuk-dong, Dong-gu, Gwangju 501-825, Korea. Tel: 82-62-220-3840, Fax: 82-62-232-9064, ygcho@chosun.ac.kr

Received 19 March 2007 Revised 27 August 2008 Accepted 27 August 2008

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the push-out strength of a fiber post cemented with various resin cements. Newly extracted 36 human mandibular premolars which had single root canal were selected and their crown portions were removed. The root canal was instrumented using PROTAPER™ system and obturated using continuous wave technique. In each root, a 9-mm deep post space was prepared. #2 translucent fiber post (DT Light post, Bisco Inc., Schaumburg, IL, U.S.A.) was cemented using injection technique with Uni-dose needle tip (Bisco) and six different resin cements. The tested resin cements were Duo-Link (Bisco Inc., Schaumburg, IL, U.S.A.), Variolink II (Ivoclar-Vivadent AG, Schann, Liechtenstein), Panavia F (Kuraray Medical Inc., Okayama, Japan), Multilink Automix (Ivoclar-Vivadent AG, Schann, Liechtenstein), RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE Dental Products, St. Paul, MN, U.S.A.), and Maxcem (Kerr Co., CA, U.S.A.). After storage in distilled water for 24 hours, each root was transversally sectioned into approximately 1-mm thick sections. This procedure resulted in 6 serial sections per root. Push-out test was performed using a universal testing machine (EZ Test, Shimadzu Co.) with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD (p=0.05).

The push-out strength of the groups which cemented fiber post with Panavia F and Multilink Automix were lower than those of the other groups. But, there were no statistically significant difference among groups at a probability level of 0.05.

Keywords: Fiber post, Resin cement, Root dentin, Push-out test, Injection technique

Figures and Tables

Figure 1

Device designed for push-out test and universal testing machine

Table 1

Resin cements tested in this study

Table 2

Push-out strength for each group

References

1. Sahafi A, Peutzfeidt A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K. Bond strength of resin cement to dentin and surface-treated posts of titanium alloy, glass fiber, and zirconia. J Adhes Dent. 2003. 5(2):153–162.

2. Boschian Pest L, Cavalli G, Bertani P, Gagliani M. Adhesive post-endodontic restorations with fiber posts: push-out tests and SEM observation. Dent Mater. 2002. 18:596–602.

3. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-codoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resion posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent. 2000. 13(Spec No):15B–18B.

4. Galhano GA, Valandro LF, De Meto RM, Scotti R, Bottino MA. Evaluation of the flexural strength of carbon fiber-, quartz fiber-, and glass fiber-based posts. J Endod. 2005. 31(3):209–211.

5. Mannocci F, Sherriff M, Watson TF. Three-point bending test of fiber posts. J Endod. 2001. 27(12):758–761.

6. Fredriksson M, Astback J, Pamenius M, Arvidson K. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent. 1998. 80(2):151–157.

7. Mallmann A, Jacques LB, Valandro LF, Mathias P, Muench A. Microtensile bond stength of light- and self-cored adhesive systems to intraradicular dentin using a translucent fiber post. Oper Dent. 2005. 30(4):500–506.

8. Mitchell CA, Orr JF, Connor KN, Magill JPG, Maguire GR. Comparative study of four glass ionomer luting cements during post pullout test. Dent Mater. 1994. 10:88–89.

9. Goracci C, Sadeck FT, Fabianelli A, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Evaluation of the adhension of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin. Oper Dent. 2005. 30(5):627–635.

10. Kallas M, Koss D, Hahn H, Hellmann J. Interfacial stress state present in a "thin-slice" fiber push-out test. J Mater Sci. 1992. 27(14):3821–3826.

11. Valandro LF, Andreatta Filho OD, Valera MC, De Araujo MAM. The effect of adhesive system on the pullout strength of a fiberglass-reinforced composite post system in bovine teeth. J Adhes Dent. 2005. 7(4):331–336.

12. Cho YG, Cho GC. Marginal Microleakage of Self-etching Primer Adhesives and a Self-etching Adhesive. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2002. 27:493–501.

13. Malferrari S, Monaco C, Scotti R. Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fiber-reinforced epoxy resin post. Int J Prosthodont. 2003. 16:39–44.

14. Monticelli F, Grandini S, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Clinical behavior of translucent fiber post: a 2-year prospective study. Int J Prosthodont. 2003. 16:593–596.

15. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Manson PN. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber post. Am J Dent. 2000. 13:Spec No. 9B–13B.

16. Goracci C, Fabianelli A, Sadek FT, Papaccbini F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. The contribution of friction to the dislocation resistance of bonded fiber posts. J Endod. 2005. 31(8):608–612.

17. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandini S, Geppi S. Influence of microbrush on efficacy of bonding into root canals. Am J Dent. 2002. 15:227–231.

18. Pirani C, Cberasoni S, Foscbi F, Piana G, Lousbine RJ, Tay FR, Prati C. Does hybridization of intraradicular dentin really improve fiber post retention in endodontically treated teeth? J Endod. 2005. 31(12):891–894.

19. Fakiha Z, Al-Aujan A, Al-Shamrani S. Retention of cast posts cemented with zinc phosphate cement using different cementing techniques. J Prosthodont. 2001. 10(1):37–41.

20. Bouillaguet S, Troesch S, Wataha JC, Kreijci I, Meyer JM, Pashley DH. Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin. Dent Mater. 2003. 19:199–205.

21. Feilzer A, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stresses in composite for two different curing modes. Dent Mater. 1993. 9:2–5.

22. Tay FR, Gwinnet AJ, Wei SHY. Variability in microleakage observed in a total-etch wet-bonding technique under different handling conditions. J Dent Res. 1995. 74:1168–1178.

23. Pashley DH, Ciucchi B, Sano H, Horner JA. Permeability of dentin to adhesive agents. Quintessence Int. 1993. 24:618–631.

24. Kim JW, Yoo MK, Lee SJ, Lee KW. Microtensile Bonding of Resin Fiber Reinforced Post to Radicular Dentin using Resin Cement. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2003. 28:80–87.

25. Kim DW, Park SJ, Choi KK. Compatibility of Self-etching Dentin Adhesives with Resin Luting Cements. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2005. 30:493–504.

TOOLS

Similar articles