PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of burs on microleakage of Class V resin restorations when a self-etching primer adhesive was used.
Forty Class V cavities were prepared with four different cutting burs on extracted third molars, and divided into one of four equal groups (n = 10); Group 1-plain cut carbide bur (no. 245), Group 2-cross cut carbide bur (no. 557), Group 3-fine diamond bur (TF-21F), Group 4-standard diamond bur (EX-41).
The occlusal and gingival margin of cavities was located in enamel and dentin, respectively. Cavities were treated with Clearfil SE Bond and restored with Clearfil AP-X. Specimens were thermocycled, immersed in a 2% methylene blue solution for 24 hours, and bisected longitudinally. They were observed leakages at enamel and dentinal margins. Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon signed ranked test.
The results of this study were as follows;
1. At enamel margin, microleakage of group 4 was statistically higher than those of group 1, 2 and 3 (p < 0.01).
2. At dentinal margin, microleakage of group 4 was statistically higher than group 3 (p < 0.01), but group 1 and 2 were not statistically different with group 3 and 4.
3. Enamel microleakage was statistically higher than dentinal microleakage in group 1, 2 and 3 (p < 0.05), but statistical difference between the microleakage of enamel and dentinal margin was not in group 4.
In conclusion, the use of coarse diamond bur showed high microleakage at both enamel and dentinal margin when Clearfil SE Bond was used in class V cavity.
Figures and Tables
References
1. Inoue H, Inoue S, Uno S, Takahashi A, Koase K, Sano H. Microtensile bond strength of two single-step adhesive systems to prpared dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2001. 3:129–136.
2. Ishioka S, Caputo AA. Interaction between the dentinal smear layer and composite bond strength. J Prosthet Dent. 1989. 61:180–185.
3. Kiremitci A, Yalcin F, Gokalp S. Bonding to enamel and dentin using self-etching adhesive systems. Quintessence Int. 2004. 35:367–370.
4. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater. 2001. 17:296–308.
5. Finger WJ, Manabe A, Alker B. Dentin surface roughness vs. bond strength of dentin adhesives. Dent Mater. 1989. 5:319–323.
6. Ogata M, Harada N, Yamaguchi S, Nakajima M, Tagami J. Effect of self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid etchant on bonding to bur-prepared dentin. Oper Dent. 2002. 27:447–454.
7. Oliveira SSA, Pugach MK, Hilton JF, Watanabe LG, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW Jr. The influence of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: a self-etching primer vs a total-etch system. Dent Mater. 2003. 19:758–767.
8. Toledano M, Osorio R, De Leonardi G, Rosales-Leal J, Ceballos L, Cabererizo-Vilchez MA. Influence of self-etching primer on the resin adhesion to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent. 2001. 14:205–210.
9. Chan KM, Tay FR, King NM, Imazato S, Pashley DH. Bonding of mild self-etching primers/adhesives to dentin with thick smear layers. Am J Dent. 2003. 16:340–346.
10. Jung M, Wehlen LO, Klimek J. Surface roughness and bond strength of enamel to composite. Dent Mater. 1999. 15:250–256.
11. Reis AF, Oliveira MT, Giannini M, De Goes MF, Rueggeberg FA. The effect of organic solvents on one-bottle adhesives, bond strength to enamel and dentin. Oper Dent. 2003. 28:700–706.
12. Oliveira SS, Marshall SJ, Hilton JF, Marshall GW. Etching kinetics of a self-etching primer. Biomaterials. 2002. 23:4105–4112.
13. Ogata M, Harada N, Yamaguchi S, Nakajima M, Pereria PNR, Tagami J. Effect of different burs on dentin bond strengths of self-etching primer bonding systems. Oper Dent. 2001. 26:375–382.
14. Tay FR, Carvalho R, Sano H, Pashley DH. Effect of smear layers on the bonding of a self-etching primer to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2000. 2:99–116.
15. Perdigao J, Geraldeli S. Bonding characteristics of self-etching adhesives to intact versus prepared enamel. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2003. 15:32–41.
16. Prati C, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi R. Resin-infiltrated dentin layer formation of new bonding systems. Oper Dent. 1998. 23:185–194.
17. Ayad MF, Rosenstiel SF, Hassan MM. Surface roughness of dentin after tooth preparation with different rotary instrumentation. J Prosthet Dent. 1996. 75:122–128.
18. McInnes PM, Wendt SL Jr, Retief DH, Weinberg R. Effect of dentin surface roughness on shear bond strength. Dent Mater. 1990. 6:204–207.
19. Dias WR, Pereira PN, Swift Ed Jr. Effect of bur types on microtensile bond strengths of self-etching systems to human dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2004. 6:195–203.
20. Kubo S, Yokota H, Sata Y, Hayashi Y. Microleakage of self-etching primers after thermal and flexural load cycling. Am J Dent. 2001. 14:163–169.
21. Cho YG, Kim HK, Lee YG. The influence of irm temporary restorations on marginal microleakage of dentin adhesives. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2003. 28:1–10.
22. Cho YG, Cho KC. Marginal microleakage of self-etching primer adhesives and a self-etching adhesive. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2002. 27:493–501.
23. Hosoya Y, Shinkawa H, Suefiji C, Nozaka K, Garcia-Gody F. Effects of diamond bur particle size on dentin bond strength. Am J Dent. 2004. 17:359–364.
24. Koibuchi H, Yasuda N, Nakabayashi N. Bonding to dentin with a self-etching primer: the effect of smear layers. Dent Mater. 2001. 17:122–126.
25. Bouillaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha JC, Ciucchi B, Cattani M, Godin CH. Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventinal, one-step, and self-etching adhesive systems. J Dent. 2001. 29:55–61.
26. Lopes GC, Marson FC, Vieira LCC, de Andrada MAC, Baratieri LN. Composite bond strength to enamel with self-etching primers. Oper Dent. 2004. 29:424–429.
27. Sekimoto T, Derkson GD, Richardson AS. Effect of cutting instruments on permeability and morphology of the dentin surface. Oper Dent. 1999. 24:130–136.
28. Koase K, Inoue S, Noda M, Tanaka T, Kawamoto C, Takahashi A, Nakaoki Y, Sano H. Effect of bur-cut dentin on bond strnegth using all-in-one and two-step adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent. 2004. 6:97–104.
XML Download