Effect of resin sealants on the reduction of microleakage in composite restorations

Young-Gon Cho; Mun-Hong Kim; Myung-Goo Lee

doi:10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.4.282

Journal List > J Korean Acad Conserv Dent > v.31(4) > 1056214

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Cho, Kim, and Lee: Effect of resin sealants on the reduction of microleakage in composite restorations

Original Article

Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry

Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2006; 31(4): 282-289.

Published online: 31 July 2006

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.4.282

Effect of resin sealants on the reduction of microleakage in composite restorations

Young-Gon Cho, Mun-Hong Kim, Myung-Goo Lee

Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, Korea.

Corresponding Author: Young-Gon Cho. Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, 421 Seosuk-dong, Dong-gu, Gwangju, Korea, 501-825. Tel: +82-62-220-3840, 3845 Fax: +82-62-232-9064, ygcho@mail.chosun.ac.kr

Received 21 March 2006 Revised 10 April 2006 Accepted 17 April 2006

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the ability of three resin surface sealants to prevent microleakage in Class V composite resin restorations. Forty Class V cavities with the occlusal margin in enamel and gingival margin in dentin were prepared on the buccal surfaces of sound extracted molars, and restored with composite resin. Restorations were randomly assigned into one of four equal groups (n = 10): a control group, without resin sealing, and three experimental groups in which margins were sealed with Fortify Plus, Biscover and Permaseal, respectively. Specimens were thermocycled, immersed in a 2% methylene blue solution for 4 hours, sectioned longitudinally, and observed the leakage at the occlusal and gingival margins. The result was analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney test and Wilcoxon signed rank test.

In conclusion, the ability to reduce microleakage at occlusal margins was similar in all of three sealants. However at gingival margin, it depended on the type of used resin surface sealant. At gingival margin, control and Fortify Plus group showed statistically higher microleakage than PermaSeal group, and Fortify Plus group also showed higher microleakage than BisCover group (p < 0.05).

Keywords: Resin surface sealants, Microleakage, Composite resin restorations, Class V cavities, Occlusal margins, Gingival margin

Figures and Tables

Table 1

Group classification by types of resin sealants

Table 2

Distribution of microleakage scores and mean rank at occlusal margins

Table 3

Distribution of microleakage scores and mean rank at gingival margins

Table 4

Statistical analysis of microleakage at gingival margins among groups by Mann-Whitney test

^*: Statistical differences at p < 0.05

Table 5

Statistical analysis between microleakage of occlusal and gingival margins in each group by Wilcoxon signed ranked test

^*: Microleakage of gingival margins was significant higher than that of occlusal margins (p < 0.05)

- : No significant difference between microleakage of occlusal and gingival margin

References

1. Tjan AH, Tan DE. Microleakage at gingival margins of class V composite resin restorations rebonded with various low-viscosity resin systems. Quintessence Int. 1991. 22:565–573.

2. Hansen EK, Asmussen E.. effect of dentin-bonding agent and hygroscopic expansion. Dent Mater. 1989. 5:122–126.

3. Munro GA, Hilton TJ, Hermesch CB. In vitro microleakage of etched and bonded class 5 composite resin restorations. Oper Dent. 1996. 21:203–208.

4. Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Chinelatti MA, Dibb RGP, Mondelli J. Effect of three surface sealants on marginal sealing of class V composite resin restorations. Oper Dent. 2000. 25:448–453.

5. Reid JS, Saunders WP, Chen YY. The effect of bonding agent and fissure sealant on microleakage of composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int. 1991. 22:295–298.

6. Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Effect of low-viscosity resin-based composite on the microleakage of cervical restorations. Am J Dent. 2003. 16:244–248.

7. Lutz E, Krejci I, Oldenburg TR. Elimination of polymerization stresses at margins of posterior composite resin restorations. A new restorative technique. Quintessence Int. 1986. 17:777–784.

8. Marais JT. Depth of cure of light cured composite resin with light curing units of different intensity. J Dent Assoc S Afr. 1997. 52:403–407.

9. Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PNR, Nikaido T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. The effect of a "resin coating" on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays. Oper Dent. 2003. 28:28–35.

10. Pameijer CH, Wendt SL. Microleakage of "surface-sealing" materials. Am J Dent. 1995. 8:43–46.

11. Bertrand MF, Leforestier E, Muller M, Lupi-Pegurier L, Bolla M. Effect of surface penetrating sealant on surface texture and microhardness of composite resins. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000. 53:658–663.

12. Crim GA. Effect of composite resin on the microleakge of Scotchbond 2 Gluma. Am J Dent. 1988. 1:215–216.

13. Doray PG, Eldiwany MS, Powers JM. Effect of resin surface sealers on improvement of stain resistance for a composite provisional material. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2003. 15:244–250.

14. May KN Jr, Swift EJ, Wilder AD, Futrell SC. Effect of a surface sealant on microleakage of Class V restorations. Am J Dent. 1996. 9:133–136.

15. Dickinson GL, Leinfelder KF. Assessing the long-term effect of a surface penetrating sealant. J Am Dent Assoc. 1993. 124:68–72.

16. Torstenson B, Brannstrom M, Mattson B. A new method of sealing composite resin contraction gaps in lined cavities. J Dent Res. 1985. 64:450–453.

17. Erhardt MC, Magalhaes CS, Serra MC. The effect of rebonding on microleakage of class V aesthetic restorations. Oper Dent. 2002. 27:396–402.

18. Estafan D, Dussetschleger FL, Miuo LE, Kondamani J. Class V lesions restored with flowable composite and added surface sealing resin. Gen Dent. 2000. 48:78–80.

19. Shinkai K, Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF, Katoh Y. Effect of surface-penetrating sealant on resistance of luting agents. Quintessence Int. 1994. 25:767–771.

20. Vankerckhoven H, Lambrechts P, Van Beylen M. Unreacted methacrylate groups on the surface of composite resins. J Dent Res. 1982. 61:791–795.

21. Suh BI. A new resin technology: a glaze/composite sealant that cures without forming an oxygen-inhibited layer. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2003. 24:27–29.

22. Barghi N, Alexander C. A new surface sealant for polishing composite resin restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2003. 24:30–33.

23. Ramos RP, Chinelatti MA, Chimello DT, Dibb RGP. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low-viscosity resin systems. Quintessence Int. 2002. 33:450–456.

24. Suzuki M, Gwinnett AJ, Jordan RE. Relationship between composite resins and dentin treated with bonding agents. J Am Dent Assoc. 1989. 118:75–77.

25. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AL, Davidson CL. Relaxation of polymerization contraction shear stress by hygroscopic expansion. J Dent Res. 1990. 69:36–39.

TOOLS

Similar articles