Journal List > J Korean Acad Conserv Dent > v.30(6) > 1056183

Hwang, Kang, and Seo: Coincidence between radiographs and clearing samples on the root canal systems of single rooted premolars

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the root canal systems of maxillary and mandibular premolars that had a single root using radiographs and clearing samples. 142 single rooted premolars were selected and mesio-distal and bucco-lingual views were radiographed using intra-oral dental standard films. Four equally trained examiners classify the root canal types from the developed radiographs. After opening the tooth for access, it was stored in 5% NaOCl to dissolve the pulp tissue. Indian ink was then injected into the pulp cavity to stain the pulp tissue. It was cleared in methyl salicylate after being decalcified with 5% nitric acid for 48 hours, and the root canal type was evaluated at a magnification of × 20 using a stereomicroscope.
The results are as follows;
There were statistically significant differences between the radiographs and clearing samples of the root canal types among examiners (p < 0.05). There might be differences in the root canal types among examiners when the same radiograph is used. Therefore, considering the difficulty in estimating the root canal types, clinicians need to be careful when interpreting radiographs before root canal therapy.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1
A paralleling device.
jkacd-30-461-g001
Figure 2
A double exposed radiograph.
jkacd-30-461-g002
Figure 3
Classification of root canal types on radiographs.
jkacd-30-461-g003
Figure 4
Classification of root canal types on clearing samples.
jkacd-30-461-g004
Table 1
Root canal types by interpreted radiographs (%)
jkacd-30-461-i001

*: Significantly different at p < 0.05 (χ2 test)

Table 2
A comparison of root canal types between radiographs and clearing samples
jkacd-30-461-i002

*: Significantly different at p < 0.05 (χ2 test)

Table 3
Coincidence of root canal types between radiographs and clearing samples (%)
jkacd-30-461-i003
Table 4
Coincidence according to the root canal types (%)
jkacd-30-461-i004

○: Correct, ×: Incorrect

Table 5
Coincidence ratio among examiners
jkacd-30-461-i005

References

1. Weine FS. Endodontic Therapy. 1982. 3rd ed. Mosby;210–211.
2. Ingle JI, Bakland LK. Endodontics. 2002. 5th ed. BC Decker Inc;405–408.
3. Lim SS. Clinical Endodontics. 1999. 2nd ed. Dental & Medical Publishing Co;42–76.
4. Cohen S, Burns RC. Pathways of the pulp. 2002. 8th ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby;194–209.
5. Hession RW. Endodontic morphology, II. A radiographic analysis. Oral Surg. 1977. 44:610–620.
6. Pineda F, Kuttler Y. Mesiodistal and buccolingual roentgenographic investigation of 7,275 root canals. Oral Surg. 1972. 33:101–110.
crossref
7. Pineda F. Roentgenographic investigations of the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar. Oral Surg. 1973. 36:253–260.
crossref
8. Slowey RR. Radigoraphic aids in the detection of extra root canals. Oral Surg. 1974. 37:762–772.
9. Green D. Double canals in single roots. Oral Surg. 1973. 35:689–696.
crossref
10. Hsu YY, Kim S. The receted root surface: The issue of canal isthmus. Dent Clin North Am. 1997. 41:529–540.
11. Weller RN, Niemczyk SP, Kim S. Incidence and position of the canal isthmus. Part 1. Mesiobuccal oot of the maxillary first molar. J Endod. 1995. 21:380–383.
12. Kartal N, Ozcelik B, Cimilli H. Root canal morphology of maxillary premolars. J Endod. 1998. 24:417–419.
crossref
13. Robertson D, Leeb IJ, McKee M, Brewer E. A clearing technique for the study of root canal systems. J Endod. 1980. 6:421–424.
crossref
14. Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg. 1984. 58:589–599.
crossref
15. Vertucci F, Seelig A, Gillis R. Root canal morphology of the human maxillary second premolar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1974. 38:456–464.
crossref
16. Gilles J, Reader A. An SEM investigation of the mesiolingual canal in human maxillary first and second molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1990. 70:638–643.
crossref
17. Baumann MA, Doll GM. Spatial reproduction of the root canal system by magnetic resonance microscopy. J Endod. 1997. 23:49–51.
crossref
18. Goldman M, Pearson AH, Darzenta ND. Endodontic success-Who's reading the radiograph? Oral Surg. 1972. 33:432–437.
crossref
19. Gelfand M, Sunderman EJ, Goldman M. Reliability of radiographical interpretations. J Endod. 1983. 9:71–75.
crossref
20. Zakariasen KL, Scott DA, Jensen JR. Endodontic recall radiographs: How reliable is our interpretation of endodontic success or failure and what factors affect our reliability? Oral Surg. 1984. 57:343–347.
crossref
21. Senia ES, Marshall FJ, Rosen S. The solvent action of sodium hypochlorite on pulp tissue of extracted teeth. Oral Surg. 1971. 31:96–103.
crossref
22. Pollard BK, Weller RN, Kulid JC. Standardized technique for linear dye leakage studies: Immediate versus delayed immersion times. Int Endod J. 1990. 23:250–253.
crossref
23. Tamse A, Katz A, Kablan F. Comparison of apical leakage shown by four different dyes with two evaluating methods. Int Endod J. 1998. 31:333–337.
crossref
24. Friedman S, Lustman J, Shaharabany V. Treatment results of apical surgery in premolar and molar teeth. J Endod. 1991. 17:30–33.
crossref
25. Omer OE, Al Shalabi RM, Jennings M, Glennon J, Claffey NM. A comparison between clearing and radiographic techniques in the study of the root-canal anatomy of maxillary first and second molars. Int Endod J. 2004. 37:291–296.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles