Microtensile bond strength of single step adhesives to dentin

Young-Gon Cho; Young-Jae Kee

doi:10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.4.312

Journal List > J Korean Acad Conserv Dent > v.30(4) > 1056166

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Cho and Kee: Microtensile bond strength of single step adhesives to dentin

Original Article

Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry

Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2005; 30(4): 312-318.

Published online: 30 July 2005

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.4.312

Microtensile bond strength of single step adhesives to dentin

Young-Gon Cho, Young-Jae Kee

Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, Korea.

Corresponding author: Young-Gon Cho. Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, 421 Seosuk-dong, Dong-gu, Gwangju, Korea, 501-825. Tel: 82-62-220-3840, 3845, Fax: 82-62-232-9064, ygcho@mail.chosun.ac.kr

Received 24 December 2004 Revised 18 February 2005 Accepted 5 March 2005

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This study compared the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of three single step adhesives to dentin.

Occlusal superficial dentin was exposed in fifteen human molars. They were assigned to three groups by used adhesives: Xeno group (Xeno III), Prompt group (Adper Prompt L-Pop), AQ group (AQ Bond).

Each adhesive was applied to dentin surface, and composite of same manufacturer was constructed. The bonded specimens were sectioned into sticks with an interface area approximately 1 mm², and subjected to µTBS testing with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. The results of this study were as follows;

The µTBS to dentin was 48.78 ± 9.83 MPa for Xeno III, 30.22 ± 4.52 MPa for Adper Prompt L-Pop, and 26.31 ± 7.07 MPa for AQ Bond.

The mean µTBS of Xeno group was significantly higher than that of Prompt group and AQ group (p < 0.05).

There was no significant difference between the µTBS of Prompt group and AQ group.

Keywords: Microtensile bond strength (µTBS), Single step adhesives, Superficial dentin, Interface area

Figures and Tables

Figure 1

Specimen adhered to the testing apparatus.

Figure 2

EZ test for microtensile bond strength test.

Table 1

The components and pH of single step adhesives and composites

HEMA: 2 hydroxyethyl methacrylate, Pyro-EMA: tetramethacryloxyethyl pyrophophate, PEM-F: pentamethacryloxyethyl cyclophophazen mono fluoride, UDMA: urethane dimeth-acrylate, BHT: 2,6-Di-tert-butyl-p hydroxyl toluene, EPD: p-dimethylamino ethyl benzoate, Bis-GMA: Bisphenol glycidyl methacrylate, 4-META: 4-metha-cryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride, PTS: p-toluensulfinic acid sodium salt

Table 2

Mean microtensile bond strength of each group (Unit: MPa, Mean ± S.D.)

Superscripts of the different letters indicate values of statistical significant difference (p < 0.05, Tukey test).

References

1. Toledano M, Perdigao J, Osorio E. Influence of NaOCL deproteinization on shear bond strength in function of dentin depth. Am J Dent. 2002. 15:252–255.

2. Cho YG, Jeong JH, Ki YJ, Choi HY, Jin CH, Yoo SH, Kim JU, Park BC. Marginal microleakage of single step adhesives. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2004. 29:162–169.

3. Medina VO, Shinkai K, Shirono M, Tanaka N, Katoh Y. Histopathologic study on pulp response to single-bottle and self-etching adhesive systems. Oper Dent. 2002. 27:330–342.

4. Toba S, Veerapravati W, Shimada Y, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Microshear bond strengths of adhesive resins to coronal dentin versus the floor of the pulp chamber. Am J Dent. 2003. 16:51A–56A.

5. Cardoso PE, Braga RR, Carrilho MR. Evaluation of micro-tensile, shear and tensile tests determining the bond strength of three adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 1998. 14:394–398.

6. Perdigao J, Frankenberger R, Rosa BT, Breschi L. New trends in dentin/enamel adhesion. Am J Dent. 2000. 13:25D–30D.

7. Miyazaki M, Mikitake S, Onose H, Moore BK. Influence of thermal cycling on dentin bond strength of two-step bonding systems. Am J Dent. 1998. 11:118–122.

8. Akagawa H, Nikaido T, Takada T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. Shear bond strengths to coronal and pulp chamber floor dentin. Am J Dent. 2002. 15:383–388.

9. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho RM. Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength-evaluation of micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater. 1994. 10:236–240.

10. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test. Dent Mater. 1998. 14:212–221.

11. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater. 1995. 11:117–125.

12. Toledano M, Osorio R, Ceballos L, Fuentes MV, Fernandes CAO, Tay FR, Carvalho RM. Microtensile bond strength of several adhesive systems to different dentin depths. Am J Dent. 2003. 16:292–298.

13. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Satoshi I, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Armstrong S, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Microtensile bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Am J Dent. 2003. 16:414–420.

14. Brunton PA, Cowan AJ, Wilson MA. A three-year evaluation of restorations placed with smear-layer-mediated dentin bonding agent in non-carious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent. 1999. 1:333–341.

15. Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Sano H, Van Meerbeek B. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2001. 3:237–245.

16. Perdigao J. Dentin bonding as a function of dentin structure. Dent Clin North Am. 2002. 46:277–301.

17. Ikemura K, Koura Y, Endo T. Effect of 4-acryloxyethyltrimellitic acid in a self-etching primer on bonding to ground dentine. Dent Mater J. 1996. 15:132–143.

18. Koibuchi H, Yasuda N, Nakabayashi N. Bonding to dentin with a self-etching primer: The effect of smear layer. Dent Mater. 2001. 17:122–126.

19. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater. 2001. 17:296–308.

20. Camps J, Pashley DH. Buffering action of human dentin in vitro. J Adhes Dent. 2000. 2:39–50.

21. Nakabayashi N, Saimi Y. Bonding to intact dentin. J Dent Res. 1996. 75:1706–1715.

22. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Peters MC. Adhesive permeability affects composite coupling to dentin treated with a self-etch adhesive. Oper Dent. 2003. 28:610–621.

23. Chan KM, Tay FR, King NM, Imazato S, Pashley DH. Bonding of mild self-etching primers/adhesives to dentin with thick smear layers. Am J Dent. 2003. 16:340–346.

24. Watanabe I, Saimi Y, Nakabayashi N. Effect of smear layer on bonding to ground dentin-Relationship between griding condition and tensile bond strength. J Jpn Soc Dent Mater Devices. 1994. 13:101–108.

25. Cheong C, King NM, Pashley DH, Ferrari M, Toledano M, Tay FR. Incompatibility of self-etch adhesives with chemical/dual-cured composites: two-step vs one-step systems. Oper Dent. 2003. 28:747–755.

26. Miyazaki M, Iwasaki K, Onose H. Adhesion of single application bonding systems to bovine enamel and dentin. Oper Dent. 2002. 27:88–94.

27. Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. "No-bottle" vs "multi-bottle" dentin adhesives- a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater. 2001. 17:373–380.

28. Inoue H, Inoue S, Uno S, Takahashi A, Koase K, Sano H. Micro-tensile bond strength of two single-step adhesive systems to bur-prepared dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2001. 3:129–136.

TOOLS

Similar articles