Effect of a desensitizer on microtensile bond strength of different adhesives

Sung-Yeon Hwang; Kyung-Ha Lee; Mi-Kyung Yu; Kwang-Won Lee

doi:10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.5.378

Journal List > J Korean Acad Conserv Dent > v.28(5) > 1056071

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Hwang, Lee, Yu, and Lee: Effect of a desensitizer on microtensile bond strength of different adhesives

Original Article

Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry

Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2003; 28(5): 378-384.

Published online: 30 September 2003

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.5.378

Effect of a desensitizer on microtensile bond strength of different adhesives

Sung-Yeon Hwang, Kyung-Ha Lee, Mi-Kyung Yu, Kwang-Won Lee

Department of Conservative Dentistry & Institute for Oral Bioscience College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University, Korea.

Corresponding author (lkw@moak.chonbuk.ac.kr)

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This study evaluated the influence of a desensitizer(MS coat) on microtensile bond strength of different adhesives: a three-step adhesive(All-Bond 2), a two-step adhesive(Single Bond), a one-step adhesive(One-up Bond F).

Non-caries extracted human molars were used. Dentin surface was obtained by horizontal section on midportion of crown using a water-cooled low speed diamond saw. Teeth were randomly divided into 6 group. AMO(MS coat + All Bond)-, SMO(MS coat + Single Bond)- and OMO(MS coat + One-up Bond F)-dentin surface were treated with 17% EDTA before bonded adhesive. AMX-, SMX- and OMX-dentin surface were bonded with All-Bond 2, Single Bond and One-up Bond F, respectively, with no previous treatment with MS coat and 17% EDTA. About 1cm high resin composite(Z-250™) were incrementally build-up on the treated surface. The specimens for the microtensile test were serially sectioned perpendicular to the adhesive layer to obtain 0.7×0.7 mm sticks. 30 sticks were prepared from each group.

After that, tensile bond strength for each stick was measured with Microtensile Tester at a 1mm/min crosshead speed. Fractured dentin surfaces were observed under the SEM. The results were statistically analysed by using a One-way ANOVA and Tukey's test(p<0.05).

Value in MPa were: AMO-44.35±13.21; SMO-39.35±13.32; OMO-31.07±10.25; AMX-49.22±16.38; SMX-56.02±13.35; OMX-72.93±16.19. Application of MS coat reduced microtensile bond strengths of both Single Bond and One-up Bond F, whereas microtensile bond strengths of All-Bond 2 were not affected significantly.

Keywords: Microtensile, Desensitizer, Three-step adhesive, Two-step adhesive, One-step adhesive, Bond strength

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

Schematic illustration of microtensile test

Fig. 2

Bar graph for comparison of microtensile bond strength of experimental groups.

Fig. 3

AMX group(×1000)

Fig. 4

AMO group(×1000)

Fig. 5

SMX group(×1000)

Fig. 6

SMO group(×1000)

Fig. 7

OMX group(×1000)

Fig. 8

OMO group(×1000)

Table 1

The composition of MS coat

Table 2

Materials used in this study

Table 3

Each group is classified as following

Table 4

Microtensile bond strength of experimental groups

Table 5

Comparison of microtensile bond strength among groups

References

1. Braem M, Lambrecchts P, Vanherle G. Stress-induced cervical lesion. J Prosthet Dent. 1992. 67:718–722.

2. Levitch LC, Barder JD, Shugars DA, Heymann HO. Non-carious cervical lesion(review). J Dent. 1994. 22:195–207.

3. Yoshiyama M, Noire Y, Azoic K, et al. Transmission electron microscopic characterization of hypersensitive hyman radicular dentin. J Dent Res. 1990. 69:1293–1297.

4. Pashley DH. Dentin permeability, dentin sensitivity, and treatment through tubule occlusion. J Endod. 1986. 12:465–474.

5. Kerns DG, Scheidt MJ, Pashley DH. Dentinal tubule occlusion and root hypersensitivity. J Periodontol. 1991. 62(7):421–428.

6. Camps J, Pizant S, Dejou J, Franquin JC. Effect of desensitizing agents on human dentin permeability. Am J Dent. 1998. 11(6):286–290.

7. Jain P, Vargas MA, Denehy GE, Boyer DB. Dentin desensitizing agents: SEM and X-ray microanalysis assessment. Am J Dent. 1997. 10(1):21–26.

8. Mausner IK, Goldstein GR, Georgescu M. Effect of two dentinal desensitizing agents on retention of complete cast coping using four cements. J Prosthet Dent. 1996. 75(2):129–134.

9. Zhang Y, Agee K, Pashley DH, Pashley EL. The effects of pain-free® desensitizer on dentine permeability and tobule occlusion over time, in vitro. J Clin Periodontol. 1998. 25:884–891.

10. Gillam DG, Mordan NJ, Sinodiou AD, Tang JY, Knowles JC, Gibsson R. the effect of oxalate-containing products on the exposed dentine surface: an SEM investigation. J Oral Rehabil. 2001. 28:1037–1044.

11. Snuggs AK, Cox LK, et al. Shimona M, Maeda T, Suda H, editors. Colloidal MSE for differential diagnosis and treatment of dentin permeability. Dentin/pulp complex. 1996. Quintessence;245–247.

12. Seara SF, Erthral BS, Ribeiro M, Kroll L, Pereira GDS. The influence of a dentin desensitizer on the microtensile bond strength of two bonding systems. Oper Dent. 2002. 27:154–160.

13. Pashley EL, Tao L, Pashely D. Effects of oxalate on dentin bonding. Am J Dent. 1993. 6(3):116–118.

14. Swift EJ Jr, Lloyd AH, Felton DA. The effect of resin desensitizing agents on crown retention. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997. 128:195–200.

15. Yim NH, Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Gardner FM, Pashley DH. Effect of dentin desensitizers and cementing agents on retention of fuul crowns using stsndardized crown preparations. J Prosthet Dent. 2000. 83:459–465.

16. Soeno K, Taira Y, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of desensitizers on bond strength of adhesive luting agents to dentin. J Oral Rehabil. 2001. 28:1122–1128.

17. Tagami J, Tao L, Pashley DH. Correlation among dentin depth, permeability and bond strength of adhesive resins. Dent Mater. 1990. 6(1):45–50.

18. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Nakajima M, Yoshiyama M, Shono Y, Fernandes CA, Tay F. The microtensile bond test : a review. J Adhes Dent. 1999. 1:299–309.

19. Armstrong SR, Boyer DB, Keller JC. Microtensile bond strength testing and failure analysis of two dentin adhesives. Dent Mater. 1998. 14:44–50.

20. Trowbridge HO, Silver DR. A review of current approaches to in-office management of tooth hypersensitivity : a Review. Dent Clin North Am. 1990. 34(3):561–581.

21. Hogan LC, Burrow MF. The microtensile strength of bonding resins. Aust Dent J. 2001. 46(3):194–197.

TOOLS

Similar articles