Journal List > J Korean Acad Conserv Dent > v.28(5) > 1056069

Yoon, Min, and Hong: The effect of additional enamel etching on microleakage of the adhesion of self-etching primer system

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of additional enamel etching with phosphoric acid on the microleakage of the adhesion of self-etching primer system.
Class V cavity(4 mm×3 mm×1.5 mm) preparations with all margins in enamel were prepared on buccal surface of 42 extracted human upper central incisor teeth. Prepared teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups.
Group 1 : no additional pretreatment with 37% phosphoric acid (NE).
Group 2 : additional pretreatment with 37% phosphoric acid for 10 seconds (E10s).
Group 3 : additional pretreatment with 37% phosphoric acid for 20 seconds (E20s).
The adhesives(Clearfil SE Bond®, Kuraray, Osaka, Japan) and composite resins(Clearfil AP-X®, Osaka, Kuraray, Japan) were applied following the manufacturer's instructions. All the specimens were finished with the polishing disc(3M dental product, St Paul, MN, USA), thermocycled for 500 cycles between 5℃ and 55℃ and resected apical 3-mm root. 0.028 stainless steel wire was inserted apically into the pulp chamber of each tooth and sealed into position with sticky wax. Surrounding tooth surface was covered with a nail varnish 2 times except areas 1 mm far from all the margins. After drying for one day, soaked the samples in the distilled water. Microleakage was assessed by electrochemical method(System 6514, Electrometer®, Keithley, USA) in the distilled water.
In this study, the microleakage was the lowest in group 1(NE) and the highest in group 3(E20s)(NE<E10s<E20s). But no statistically significant differences were found(p=0.5).
On the basis of findings from this experiment, it can be concluded that additional enamel etching has no influence on the microleakage of the adhesion of self-etching primer system.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1
Measuring method for microleakage.
jkacd-28-363-g001
Table 1
Experimental groups.
jkacd-28-363-i001
Table 2
Effect of additional enamel etching on microleakage.
jkacd-28-363-i002
Table 3
Statistical analysis between groups.
jkacd-28-363-i003

References

1. Haller B. Recent developments in dentin bonding. Am J Dent. 2000. 13(1):44–50.
2. Nakamura K, Arisue K, Kajiwara M, et al. Evaluation of new type of commercially available adhesive systems-effect of total treatment for enamel and dentin. Jpn J Concerv Dent. 1996. 39:304–314.
3. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Davidson CL. Effect of two etching times on the sealing ability of Clearfil Liner Bond 2 in Class V restorations. Am J Dent. 1997. 10(2):66–70.
4. Hannig M, Reinhardt KJ, Bott B. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid : an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding. Oper Dent. 1999. 24:172–181.
5. Fritz UB, Diedrich P, Finger WJ. Self-etching primers-an alternative to the conventional acid etch technique. J Orofac Orthop. 2001. 62(3):238–245.
crossref
6. Torii Y, Itou K, Hikasa R, et al. Enamel tensile bond strength and morphology of resin enamel interface created by acid etching system with or without moisture and self-etching priming system. J Oral Rehabil. 2002. 29:528–533.
crossref
7. Kubo S, Yokota H, Sata Y, Hayashi Y. Microleakage of self-etching primers after thermal and flexural loading cycling. Am J Dent. 2001. 14(3):163–169.
8. Barkmeier WW, Los SA, Triolo PT Jr. Bond strengths and SEM evaluation of Clearfil Liner Bond 2. Am J Dent. 1995. 8(6):289–293.
9. Yoshiyama M, Matsuo T, Ebisu S, Pashley DH. Regional Bond strengths of self-etching/self-priming adhesive systems. J Dent. 1998. 26:609–616.
crossref
10. Lopes GC, Baratieri LN, de Andrada MA, Vieira LC. Dental Adhesion : Present state of the art and future perspectives. Quintessence Int. 2002. 33(3):213–224.
11. Miyazaki M, Sato M, Onose H. Durability of enamel bond strength of simplified bonding systems. Oper Dent. 2000. 25:75–80.
crossref
12. Sano H, Yoshikawa T, Pereira PN, et al. Long-term durability of dentin bonds made with a self-etching primer, in vivo. J Dent Res. 1999. 78(4):906–911.
crossref
13. Miyazaki M, Onose H, Moore BK. Effect of operator variability on dentin bond strength of two-step bonding systems. Am J Dent. 2000. 13(2):101–104.
14. Ibarra G, Vargas MA, Armstrong SR, Cobbb DS. Microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives to ground and unground enamel. J Adhes Dent. 2002. 4(2):115–124.
15. Yoshiyama M, Sano H, Ebisu S, et al. Regional strengths of bonding agents to cervical sclerotic root dentin. J Dent Res. 1996. 75(6):1404–1413.
crossref
16. Gordan VV, Vargas MA, Denthy GE. Interfacial ultrastructure of the resin enamel region of three adhesive systems. Am J Dent. 1998. 11(1):13–16.
17. Ogata M, Harada N, Yamaguchi S, et al. Effects of different burs on dentin bond strengths of self-etching primer bonding systems. Oper Dent. 2001. 26:375–382.
18. Sano H, Shono T, Takatsu T, Hosoda H. Microporous dentin zone beneath resin impregnated layer. Oper Dent. 1994. 19:59–64.
19. Cho YG, Cho KC. Marginal microleakage of self-etching primer adhesives and a self-etching adhesive. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2002. 27(5):493–501.
crossref
20. Osins BA, Carter JM, Shih-Levine M. Microleakage of four root canal sealer cements as determined by an electrochemical technique. Oral Surg. 1983. 56(1):80–88.
crossref
21. Jacobsen PH, von Fraunhofer JA. Assessment of microleakage using conductimetric technique. J Dent Res. 1975. 54(1):41–48.
crossref
22. Jacquot BM, Panighi MM, Steinmetz P, G'sell C. Evaluation of temporary restorations' microleakage by means of electrochemical impedance measurements. J Endod. 1996. 22(11):586–589.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles