PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of additional enamel etching with phosphoric acid on the microleakage of the adhesion of self-etching primer system.
Class V cavity(4 mm×3 mm×1.5 mm) preparations with all margins in enamel were prepared on buccal surface of 42 extracted human upper central incisor teeth. Prepared teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups.
Group 1 : no additional pretreatment with 37% phosphoric acid (NE).
Group 2 : additional pretreatment with 37% phosphoric acid for 10 seconds (E10s).
Group 3 : additional pretreatment with 37% phosphoric acid for 20 seconds (E20s).
The adhesives(Clearfil SE Bond®, Kuraray, Osaka, Japan) and composite resins(Clearfil AP-X®, Osaka, Kuraray, Japan) were applied following the manufacturer's instructions. All the specimens were finished with the polishing disc(3M dental product, St Paul, MN, USA), thermocycled for 500 cycles between 5℃ and 55℃ and resected apical 3-mm root. 0.028 stainless steel wire was inserted apically into the pulp chamber of each tooth and sealed into position with sticky wax. Surrounding tooth surface was covered with a nail varnish 2 times except areas 1 mm far from all the margins. After drying for one day, soaked the samples in the distilled water. Microleakage was assessed by electrochemical method(System 6514, Electrometer®, Keithley, USA) in the distilled water.
In this study, the microleakage was the lowest in group 1(NE) and the highest in group 3(E20s)(NE<E10s<E20s). But no statistically significant differences were found(p=0.5).
On the basis of findings from this experiment, it can be concluded that additional enamel etching has no influence on the microleakage of the adhesion of self-etching primer system.
Figures and Tables
References
1. Haller B. Recent developments in dentin bonding. Am J Dent. 2000. 13(1):44–50.
2. Nakamura K, Arisue K, Kajiwara M, et al. Evaluation of new type of commercially available adhesive systems-effect of total treatment for enamel and dentin. Jpn J Concerv Dent. 1996. 39:304–314.
3. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Davidson CL. Effect of two etching times on the sealing ability of Clearfil Liner Bond 2 in Class V restorations. Am J Dent. 1997. 10(2):66–70.
4. Hannig M, Reinhardt KJ, Bott B. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid : an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding. Oper Dent. 1999. 24:172–181.
5. Fritz UB, Diedrich P, Finger WJ. Self-etching primers-an alternative to the conventional acid etch technique. J Orofac Orthop. 2001. 62(3):238–245.
6. Torii Y, Itou K, Hikasa R, et al. Enamel tensile bond strength and morphology of resin enamel interface created by acid etching system with or without moisture and self-etching priming system. J Oral Rehabil. 2002. 29:528–533.
7. Kubo S, Yokota H, Sata Y, Hayashi Y. Microleakage of self-etching primers after thermal and flexural loading cycling. Am J Dent. 2001. 14(3):163–169.
8. Barkmeier WW, Los SA, Triolo PT Jr. Bond strengths and SEM evaluation of Clearfil Liner Bond 2. Am J Dent. 1995. 8(6):289–293.
9. Yoshiyama M, Matsuo T, Ebisu S, Pashley DH. Regional Bond strengths of self-etching/self-priming adhesive systems. J Dent. 1998. 26:609–616.
10. Lopes GC, Baratieri LN, de Andrada MA, Vieira LC. Dental Adhesion : Present state of the art and future perspectives. Quintessence Int. 2002. 33(3):213–224.
11. Miyazaki M, Sato M, Onose H. Durability of enamel bond strength of simplified bonding systems. Oper Dent. 2000. 25:75–80.
12. Sano H, Yoshikawa T, Pereira PN, et al. Long-term durability of dentin bonds made with a self-etching primer, in vivo. J Dent Res. 1999. 78(4):906–911.
13. Miyazaki M, Onose H, Moore BK. Effect of operator variability on dentin bond strength of two-step bonding systems. Am J Dent. 2000. 13(2):101–104.
14. Ibarra G, Vargas MA, Armstrong SR, Cobbb DS. Microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives to ground and unground enamel. J Adhes Dent. 2002. 4(2):115–124.
15. Yoshiyama M, Sano H, Ebisu S, et al. Regional strengths of bonding agents to cervical sclerotic root dentin. J Dent Res. 1996. 75(6):1404–1413.
16. Gordan VV, Vargas MA, Denthy GE. Interfacial ultrastructure of the resin enamel region of three adhesive systems. Am J Dent. 1998. 11(1):13–16.
17. Ogata M, Harada N, Yamaguchi S, et al. Effects of different burs on dentin bond strengths of self-etching primer bonding systems. Oper Dent. 2001. 26:375–382.
18. Sano H, Shono T, Takatsu T, Hosoda H. Microporous dentin zone beneath resin impregnated layer. Oper Dent. 1994. 19:59–64.
19. Cho YG, Cho KC. Marginal microleakage of self-etching primer adhesives and a self-etching adhesive. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2002. 27(5):493–501.
20. Osins BA, Carter JM, Shih-Levine M. Microleakage of four root canal sealer cements as determined by an electrochemical technique. Oral Surg. 1983. 56(1):80–88.
21. Jacobsen PH, von Fraunhofer JA. Assessment of microleakage using conductimetric technique. J Dent Res. 1975. 54(1):41–48.
22. Jacquot BM, Panighi MM, Steinmetz P, G'sell C. Evaluation of temporary restorations' microleakage by means of electrochemical impedance measurements. J Endod. 1996. 22(11):586–589.
XML Download