A comparison of thermoplasticized injectable gutta-percha techniques in ribbon-shaped canals : adaptation to canal walls

Hyun-sook Hwang; Kyung-mo Cho; Jin-woo Kim

doi:10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.4.411

Journal List > J Korean Acad Conserv Dent > v.27(4) > 1056014

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Hwang, Cho, and Kim: A comparison of thermoplasticized injectable gutta-percha techniques in ribbon-shaped canals : adaptation to canal walls

Original Article

Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry

Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2002; 27(4): 411-420.

Published online: 31 July 2002

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.4.411

A comparison of thermoplasticized injectable gutta-percha techniques in ribbon-shaped canals : adaptation to canal walls

Hyun-sook Hwang, Kyung-mo Cho, Jin-woo Kim

Department of Conservative dentistry, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University, Korea.

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare the adaptability of thermoplasticized injectable gutta-percha technique to the canal walls in ribbon-shaped canals.

Thirty resin models simulated ribbon-shape canals were instrumented to #40 using .06 taper Profile systems. Three groups of each 10 resin models were obturated by the lateral condensation technique(LC) and the two thermoplasticized injectable gutta-percha technique; Ultrafil Endoset+Obtura II(EO) and Ultrafil Firmset(UF), respectively.

After resin model were kept at room temperature for 4 days, they were resected horizontally with microtome at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5mm levels from apex. At each levels, image of resected surface were taken using CCD camera under a stereomicroscope at ×40 magnification and stored. Ratio of the area of gutta-percha was obtained by calculating area of gutta-percha cone to the total area of canal using digitized image-analyzing program. The data were collected then analyzed statistically using One-way ANOVA.

The results were as follows.

1. At 1mm levels, there was no statistically significant difference in the mean ratio of gutta-percha among the groups.

2. At 2mm level, EO showed the highest mean ratio of gutta-percha (p<0.05) and there was no significant difference between LC and UF.

3. At 3, 4, 5mm levels, EO and UF had significantly greater mean ratio of gutta-percha than LC(p<0.05) and there was no significant difference between EO and UF.

In conclusion, the thermoplasticized injectable gutta-percha techniques demonstrated relatively favorable adaptability to canal walls than lateral condensation technique in ribbon-shaped canals except for 1mm level.

Keywords: Ribbon-shaped canal, Thermoplasticized injectable gutta-percha technique, Adaptability

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

Mean ratio of area of gutta-percha in each group.

Fig. 2

Mean ratio of area of gutta-percha for each level.

Fig. 3

Representative photograph of Ultrafil Endoset+Obtura II group at the 1mm level showing the incomplete obturation of isthmus.(orginal magnification ×40)

Fig. 4

Representative photograph of Ultrafil Firmset group at the 1mm level showing the incomplete obturation of isthmus.(orginal magnification ×40)

Fig. 5

Representative photograph of Lateral condensation group at the 1mm level showing the incomplete obturation of isthmus.(orginal magnification ×40)

Fig. 6

Representative photograph of Ultrafil Endoset+Obtura II group at the 2mm level showing the complete obturation of isthmus.(orginal magnification ×40)

Fig. 7

Representative photograph of Ultrafil Firmset group at the 2mm level showing the complete obturation of isthmus.(orginal magnification ×40)

Fig. 8

Representative photograph of Lateral condensation group at the 2mm level showing the complete obturation of isthmus.(orginal magnification ×40)

Fig. 9

Representative photograph of Ultrafil Endoset+Obtura II group at the 3mm level showing the good adaptability to the canal wall.(orginal magnification ×40)

Fig. 10

Representative photograph of Ultrafil Firmset group at the 3mm level showing the good adaptability to the canal wall.(orginal magnification ×40)

Fig. 11

Representative photograph of Lateral condensation group at the 3mm level showing the gaps between gutta-perchas.(orginal magnification ×40)

Fig. 12

Representative photograph of Ultrafil Endoset+Obtura II group at the 4mm level showing the good adaptability to the canal wall.(orginal magnification ×40)

Fig. 13

Representative photograph of Ultrafil Firmset group at the 4mm level showing the good adaptability to the canal wall.(orginal magnification ×40)

Fig. 14

Representative photograph of Lateral condensation group at the 4mm level showing the gaps between gutta-perchas and canal wall.(orginal magnification ×40)

Fig. 15

Representative photograph of Ultrafil Endoset+Obtura II group at the 5mm level showing the good adaptability to the canal wall.(orginal magnification ×40)

Fig. 16

Representative photograph of Ultrafil Firmset group at the 5mm level showing the good adaptability to the canal wall.(orginal magnification ×40)

Fig. 17

Representative photograph of Lateral condensation group at the 5mm level showing the gaps between gutta-perchas and canal wall.(orginal magnification ×40)

Table 1

Experimental group

Table 2

Mean ratio of area of gutta-percha(%) and standard deviation

Table 3

Significance testing of mean ratio of area of gutta-percha at 1mm level in each group

NS : not statistically significant

Table 4

Significance testing of mean ratio of area of gutta-percha at 2mm level in each group

^*statistically significant(p<0.05)

Table 5

Significance testing of mean ratio of area of utta-percha at 3, 4, 5mm level in each group

^*statistically significant(p<0.05)

References

1. Nguyen NT. Cohens S, Burns RC, editors. Obturation of the root canal system. Pathways of the pulp. 1984. 3rd ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby Co.;205–259.

2. Ingle JI, Dow PR. Isotope determination of root canal failure. Oral Surg. 1955. 8:1100–1104.

3. Norman WR, Niemczky SP, Kim S. Incidence and position of the canal isthmus Part I Mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar. J Endod. 1995. 21:380–383.

4. Pineda F. Roentgenograhic investigation of the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1973. 36:253–260.

5. Green D. Double canals in single roots. Oral Surg. 1973. 35:689–696.

6. Cambruzzi JV, Marshall FJ. Molar endodontic surgery. J Can Dent Assoc. 1983. 49:61–65.

7. Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1973. 35:226–231.

8. Baryton SM, Davis SR, Goldman M. Gutta-percha root canal fillings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1973. 35:226–231.

9. Weller RM, Kimbrough WF, Anderson RW. A comparison of thermoplastic obturation techniques : Adaptation to the canal walls. J Endod. 1997. 23:703–706.

10. Yee FS, Marlin J, Gron P. Three-dimensional obturation of the root canal using injection-molded thermoplasticised dental gutta-percha. J Endod. 1977. 3:168–174.

11. Torabinejad M, Skobe Z, Trombly PL, Krakow AA, Gron P, Marlin J. Scanning electron microscopic study of root canal obturation using thermoplasticized gutta-percha. J Endod. 1978. 4:245–250.

12. Marlin J, Krakow AA, Desilets RP, Gron P. Clinical use of injection-molded thermoplasticized gutta-percha for obturation of the root canal system : a preliminary report. J Endod. 1981. 7:277–281.

13. Michanowicz A, Czonstkowsky M. Sealing properties of an injection thermoplasticized low-temperature gutta-percha: a preliminary study. J Endod. 1984. 10:563–566.

14. ElDeeb ME. The sealing ability of injection-molded thermoplasticized gutta-percha. J Endod. 1985. 11:84–86.

15. LaCombe JS, Campbell AD, Hicks ML, Pelleu GB. A comparison of the apical seal produced by two thermoplasticized injectable gutta-percha techniques. J Endod. 1988. 14:445–450.

16. Beaty RG, Baker PS, Haddix J, Hart F. The efficacy of four root canal obturation techniques in preventing apical dye penetration. J Am Dent Assoc. 1989. 119:633–637.

17. Michaileso PM, Valcarcel J, Grieve AR, Levallois B, Lerner D. Bacterial leakage in endodontics : an improved method for quantification. J Endod. 1996. 22:535–539.

18. Czonstkowsky M, Michannowicz A, Vazquez J. Evaluation of an injection of thermoplasticized low temperature gutta-percha using radioactive isotopes. J Endod. 1985. 11:71–74.

19. Eguchi DS, Peters DD, Hollinger JO, Lorton L. A comparison of the area of the canal space occupied by gutta-percha following four gutta-percha obturation techniques using Procosol sealer. J Endod. 1985. 11:166–175.

20. Giani O, Visvisian C, Caso C. Quality of apical in curved canals using three types of spreaders. J Endod. 2000. 26:581–585.

21. WU MK, Wesselink PR. Endodontic leakage studies reconsidered. Part I. Methodolgy, application and relevance. Int Endod J. 1993. 26:37–43.

22. Pitt Fort TR. Relation between seal of root fillings and tissue response. Oral Surg. 1983. 55:291–294.

23. McSpadden J. Multiphase gutta-percha obturation technique. Dent Econ. 1993. 83:95–97.

24. Dulac KA, et al. Comparison of the obturation of lateral canals by six techniques. J Endod. 1999. 25:376–380.

25. Hsu YY, Kim S. The resected root surface. The issue of canal isthmus. Dent Clin North Am. 1997. 41:529–540.

TOOLS

Similar articles