Journal List > J Korean Acad Conserv Dent > v.27(4) > 1056012

TOOLS
Lee, Kim, and Park: Influence of flowable composite lining on microleakage at the gingival dentin margin
Original Article

J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2002;27(4):394-402.

Published online: 14 January 2002

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.4.394

Influence of flowable composite lining on microleakage at the gingival dentin margin

Jung Min Lee, Young Kyung Kim, Jeong-won Park

Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University

Copyright © 2002 The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Keywords: Flowable composite resin, Class II resin restoration, Microleakage

References

1. Hansen E K. Contraction pattern of composite resins in dentin cavities. Scand J. Dent. Res. 90:480–483. 1982.
crossref
2. De Gee A J, Davidson C L, Smith A A. Modified dilatometer of continuous recording of volumetric polymerization shrinkage of composite restorative materials. J Dent. 9:36–42. 1981.
3. Feilzer A J, De Gee A J, Davidson C L. Curing contraction of composites and glass ionomer cements. J Prosthet. Dent. 59:297–300. 1988.
4. Bra¨nnstro¨m M. Communication between the oral cavity and the dental pulp associated with restorative treatment. Oper Dent. 9:57–68. 1984.
5. Qvist V, Qvist J, Mjo¨r I A. Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol. Scand. 48:305–311. 1990.
crossref
6. Kim J H, Park J.-W, Park J.-H, Kim S K. Bond strength and microleakage in resin bonding to tooth structure. J Kor. Acad. Conserv. Dent. 24:570–577. 1999.
7. Lutz F, Krejci I, Oldenburg T R. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: A new restorative technique. Quint Int. 17:777–784. 1986.
8. Koenigsberg S, Fuks A, Grajower R. The effect of three filling techniques on marginal leakage around Class II composite resin restorations in vitro. Quint Int. 20:117–121. 1989.
9. Dietschi D, Siebenthal G D, Nevei-Rosenstand L, Holz J. Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite Class II restorations: an in vitro evaluation. Quint Int. 26:717–727. 1995.
10. Krejci I, Sparr D, Lutz F. A three-sited light curing technique for conventional Class II composite resin restorations. Quint Int. 18:125–131. 1987.
11. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dent Mater. 7:107–113. 1991.
crossref
12. Neiva I F, De Andrada M A C, Baratieri L N, Monteiro S Jr., Ritter A V. An in vitro study of the effect of restorative technique on marginal leakage in posterior composites. Oper Dent. 23:282–289. 1998.
13. Rada E R. Class II direct composite resin restorations with beta-quartz glass-ceramic inserts. Quint Int. 24:793–798. 1993.
14. Bertolotti R. Posterior composite technique utilizing directed polymerization shrinkage and a novel matrix. J. Practical Periodontics and Aesthet Dent. 3:53–58. 1991.
15. Crim G A, Chapman K W. Reducing microleakage in Class II restorations: An in vitro study. Quint Int. 25:781–785. 1994.
16. Swift E J, Triolo P T Jr., Barkmeier W W, Bird J L, Bounds S J. Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives. 9:100–104. 1996.
17. Leevailoj C, Cochran M A, Matis B A, Moore B K, Platt J A. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners. Oper Dent. 26:302–307. 2001.
18. Moon J.-H, Ko K.-H. The effect of flowable resin lining on the marginal microleakage of condensable resin restoration. J. Kor. Acad. Conserv Dent. 26:16–22. 2001.
19. Kemp-Scholte C M, Davidson C L. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J. Dent Res. 69:1240–1243. 1990.
crossref
20. Kemp-Scholte C M, Davidson C L. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J. Prosthet Dent. 64:658–664. 1990.
crossref
21. Rooklidge E, Boyer D, Bouschlicher M. Cusp deformation by shrinkage of condensable composite. J Dent. Res. 78:Abstracts of Papers. p399. Abstract 2349. 1999.
22. Unterbrink G L, Liebenberg W H. Flowable resin composites as “filled adhesives”: Literature review and clinical recommendations. Quint Int. 30:249–257. 1999.
23. Belli S, Inokoshi S, zer F, Pereira P N R, Ogata M, Tagami J. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of class II adhesive composite restorations. Oper Dent. 26:70–75. 2001.
24. Tung F F, Estafan D, Scherer W. Microleakage of a condensable resin composite: An in vitro investigation. Quint Int. 31:430–434. 2000.
25. Chuang S F, Liu J K, Jin Y T. Microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restorations with flowable composite linings. Oper Dent. 26:193–200. 2001.
26. Beznos C. Microleakage at the Cervical Margin of Composite Class II Cavities with Different Restorative Techniques. Oper Dent. 26:60–69. 2001.
27. Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis J P, Roos J R, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Assessment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent. Res. 72:1434–1442. 1993.
crossref
28. Davidson C L, De Gee A J, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent. Res. 63:1396–1399. 1984.
crossref
29. Jang B S, Kim S K. Bonding of resin inlay to glass-ionomer base with various treatments in inlay surface. J Kor. Acad. Conserv. Dent. 25:399–406. 2000.
30. Carvalho R M, Pereira J C, Yoshiyama M, Pashley D H. A review of polymerization contraction: The influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent. 21:17–24. 1996.
31. Feilzer A J, De Gee A J, Davidson C L. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of restoration. J. Dent Res. 66:1636–1639. 1987.
32. Kinomoto Y, Torii M. Photoelastic analysis of polymerization contraction stress in resin composite restoration. J Dent. 26:165–171. 1998.
33. Bayne S C, Thompson J Y, Swift E D Jr., Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J. Dent Ass. 129:567–577. 1998.
crossref
34. Leinfelder K F, Prasad A. A new condensable composite for the restoration of posterior teeth. Dent Today. 17:112–116. 1998.
35. The Dental Advisor : Packable composites. The Dental Advisor. 16:1–4. 1999.
36. Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater. 15:128–137. 1999.
crossref
37. Tolidis K, Setcos J C. Initial degree of polymerization shrinkage exhibited by flowable composite resins. J Dent. Res. 78:Abstracts of Papers p482 Abstract 3015. 1999.
38. Alomari Q D, Reinhardt J W, Boyer D B. Effect of liners on cusp deflection and gap formation in composite restorations. Oper Dent. 26:406–411. 2001.
39. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Restoration quality in relation to wedge-mediated light channeling. Quint Int. 23:763–767. 1992.
40. Ciamponi A L, Del Portillo Lujan V A, Ferreira Santos J F. Effectiveness of reflective wedges on the polymerization of composite resins. Quint Int. 25:599–602. 1994.
41. Barnes D M, Holston A M, Strassler H E, Shires P J. Evaluation of clinical performance of twelve posterior composite resins with a standardized placement technique. J Esthet. Dent. 2:36–43. 1990.
crossref
42. Eick J D, Welch F H. Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on postoperative sensitivity. Quint Int. 17:103–111. 1986.
43. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas W H. Do dental composites always shrink toward the light? J Dent. Res. 77:1435–1445. 1998.
crossref
44. Ferracane J L. Current trends in dental composites. Critical Reviews of Oral Biology and Medicine. 6:302–318. 1995.
crossref
45. Pires J A F, Cvitko E, Denehy G E, Swift E J Jr. Effects of curing tip distance on light intensity and composite resin microhardness. Quint Int. 24:517–521. 1993.
46. Rueggeberg F A, Jordan D M. Effect of light-tip distance on polymerization of resin composite. Int J. Prosthet. 6:364–370. 1993.
47. Dang H M, Sarrett D C. Wear behavior of flowable and condensable composite resins. J Dent. Res. 78 Abstracts of Papers p447 Abstract 2736. 1999.
48. Ulusu T, Oztas N, Tulunoglu O. Comparison of the effect of insertion techniques of a resin composite on dentinal adaptation of two visible light-cured bases: Direct evaluation versus a replica technique. Quint Int. 27:63–68. 1996.

Fig. 1.
Dye leakage test score. O=no leakage, 1; leakage within half of the gingival wall, 2; leakage within the gingival wall, 3; leakage pass the gingival wall to the axial
jkacd-27-394f1.tif

(D=dentin, CR=composite resin, ER=embedding resin)

Table 1.
Filling techniques investigated in this study
Group Flowable composite lining and its thickness Incremental insertion technique of overlying composite resin
1 Not used horizontal
2 Not used oblique
3 0.5 - 1 mm horizontal
4 0.5 - 1 mm oblique
5 2 - 3 mm horizontal
6 2 - 3 mm oblique
Table 2.
Frequency of dye penetration scores
Groups Score
 Total
0 1 2 3
1 0 3 8 9 20
2 0 10 7 3 20
3 0 8 2 10 20
4 0 7 3 10 20
5 0 5 4 11 20
6 0 6 2 12 20
Total 0 39 26 55 120

No significant difference between groups(p>0.05).

Table 3.
Frequency of dye penetration scores for oblique incremental fillings
Groups Score
 Total
0 1 2 3
2 0 10 7 3 20
4 0 7 3 10 20
6 0 6 2 12 20
Total 0 23 12 25 60

Groups connected by a line are statistically equivalent.

Table 4.
Frequency of dye penetration scores for horizontal incremental fillings
Groups Score
 Total
0 1 2 3
1 0 3 8 9 20
3 0 8 2 10 20
5 0 5 4 11 20
Total 0 16 14 30 60

Groups connected by a line are statistically equivalent.

TOOLS
Similar articles