Journal List > J Korean Diabetes > v.17(1) > 1055043

Ha, Jung, Choi, Lee, Choi, Choi, Noh, Hong, and Kim: Retrospective Observational Dose-Titration Study of Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Inadequate Glycemic Control on 15 mg of Pioglitazone

Abstract

Background

The 30 mg pioglitazone tablet was recently introduced in Korea; no study has yet compared its glucose-lowering or weight gain effects to the 15 mg tablet in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods

The electronic medical records of 45 patients with T2DM with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels > 7.0%, despite taking 15 mg/day pioglitazone and a stable dose of other diabetes drugs for 3 months, were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

After dose up-titration, HbA1c levels decreased at 3- and 6-month follow-ups compared with baseline (8.5% at baseline vs. 8.2% at 3 months vs. 7.9% at 6 months; baseline vs. 3 months, P = 0.106; baseline vs. 6 months, P = 0.005; 3 months vs. 6 months, P = 0.096). In the subgroup analysis of 36 patients taking pioglitazone, sulfonylurea, and metformin, HbA1c levels also decreased at 3- and 6-month follow-ups compared with baseline (8.5 % vs. 8.2 % vs. 7.9%; baseline vs. 3 months, P = 0.289; baseline vs. 6 months, P = 0.014; 3 months vs. 6 months, P = 0.232). There was no significant body weight change (70.8 kg vs. 70.7 kg vs. 71.0 kg).

Conclusion

Up-titrating from 15 mg to 30 mg of pioglitazone in patients with inadequate glycemic control (HbA1c > 9%) who were also taking sulfonylurea and metformin showed additive glucose-lowering effects without significant weight gain in Korean patients with T2DM

References

1. YkiJärvinen H. Thiazolidinediones. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351:1106–18.
crossref
2. Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, Diamant M, Ferrannini E, Nauck M, Peters AL, Tsapas A, Wender R, Matthews DR. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centered approach: update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015; 38:140–9.
crossref
3. Ko SH, Kim SR, Kim DJ, Oh SJ, Lee HJ, Shim KH, Woo MH, Kim JY, Kim NH, Kim JT, Kim CH, Kim HJ, Jeong IK, Hong EK, Cho JH, Mok JO, Yoon KH. Committee of Clinical Practice Guidelines, Korean Diabetes Association. 2011 clinical practice guidelines for type 2 diabetes in Korea. Diabetes Metab J. 2011; 35:431–6.
crossref
4. Schwartz S, Raskin P, Fonseca V, Graveline JF. Effect of troglitazone in insulin-treated patients with type II diabetes mellitus. Troglitazone and Exogenous Insulin Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1998; 338:861–6.
5. Inzucchi SE, Maggs DG, Spollett GR, Page SL, Rife FS, Walton V, Shulman GI. Efficacy and metabolic effects of metformin and troglitazone in type II diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1998; 338:867–72.
crossref
6. Fonseca V, Rosenstock J, Patwardhan R, Salzman A. Effect of metformin and rosiglitazone combination therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2000; 283:1695–702.
7. Horton ES, Whitehouse F, Ghazzi MN, Venable TC, Whitcomb RW. The Troglitazone Study Group. Troglitazone in combination with sulfonylurea restores glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1998; 21:1462–9.
crossref
8. Raskin P, Rendell M, Riddle MC, Dole JF, Freed MI, Rosenstock J. Rosiglitazone Clinical Trials Study Group. A randomized trial of rosiglitazone therapy in patients with inadequately controlled insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2001; 24:1226–32.
crossref
9. Kipnes MS, Krosnick A, Rendell MS, Egan JW, Mathisen AL, Schneider RL. Pioglitazone hydrochloride in combination with sulfonylurea therapy improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Am J Med. 2001; 111:10–7.
crossref
10. Hiroi S, Sugiura K, Matsuno K, Hirayama M, Kuriyama K, Kaku K, Kawakami K. A multicenter, phase III evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a new fixed-dose pioglitazone/glimepiride combination tablet in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013; 15:158–65.
crossref
11. Park Y, Lee H, Koh CS, Min H, Zimmet PZ, Rowley MJ, Mackay IR, Trucco M, Dorman JS. Low prevalence of immunogenetic markers of IDDM in adult Koreans with diabetes detected on OGTT. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1996; 34(Suppl):S37–43.
crossref
12. Abe M, Kikuchi F, Okada K, Kaizu K, Matsumoto K. Efficacy of pioglitazone on type 2 diabetic patients with hemodialysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008; 80:432–8.
crossref
13. Aronoff S, Rosenblatt S, Braithwaite S, Egan JW, Mathisen AL, Schneider RL. The Pioglitazone 001 Study Group. Pioglitazone hydrochloride monotherapy improves glycemic control in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes: a 6-month randomized placebo-controlled doseresponse study. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23:1605–11.
14. Henry RR, Staels B, Fonseca VA, Chou MZ, Teng R, Golm GT, Langdon RB, Kaufman KD, Steinberg H, Goldstein BJ. Efficacy and safety of initial combination treatment with sitagliptin and pioglitazone: a factorial study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014; 16:223–30.
15. Kutoh E. Differential regulations of lipid profiles between Japanese responders and nonresponders treated with pioglitazone. Postgrad Med. 2011; 123:45–52.
crossref
16. Tajiri Y, Takei R, Mimura K, Umeda F. Indicators for the efficacy of pioglitazone before and during treatment in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2007; 9:429–37.
crossref
17. Igarashi M, Jimbu Y, Kimura M, Hirata A, Yamaguchi H, Tominaga M. Effect of pioglitazone on atherogenic outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients: a comparison of responders and nonresponders. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007; 77:389–98.
crossref

Fig. 1.
Effect of dose-up titration of pioglitazone. (A) Effect of dose-up titration of pioglitazone on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c; n = 45). (B) Effect of dose-up titration of pioglitazone on fasting plasma glucose (FPG; n = 45). (C) Effect of dose-up titration of pioglitazone on HbA1c in sulfonylurea (SU) + metformin (MET) subgroup (n = 36). (D) Effect of dose-up titration of pioglitazone on HbA1c in maximal dose of SU + MET subgroup (n = 27).
jkd-17-51f1.tif
Table 1.
Baseline clinical characteristics of subjects (n = 45)
Characteristic Value
Age (yr) 60.6 ± 1.49
Male 29.6
Weight (kg) 71.0 ± 1.42
Height (cm) 165.8 ± 1.20
BMI (kg/m2) 25.9 ± 0.41
Systolic BP (mm Hg) 130.2 ± 2.17
Diastolic BP (mm Hg) 72.9 ± 1.85
Baseline FPG (mg/dL) 164.3 ± 5.96
Serum total cholesterol (mg/dL) 149.1 ± 4.63
Serum LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) 88.6 ± 3.59
Serum HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) 49.9 ± 1.62
Serum triglyceride (mg/dL) 132.6 ± 7.94
AST (U/L) 22.9 ± 1.11
ALT (U/L) 21.9 ± 1.46
HbA1c (%) 8.4 ± 0.84
Diabetes duration (y) 14.9 ± 1.18
Oral hypoglycemic agents
Metformin 40 (88.9)
Glimepiride 34 (75.6)
Gliclazide 9 (20.0)
α-glucosidase 2 (4.4)

Values are pressed as mean ± standard deviation, percent only, or number (%). BMI, body mass index; BP, diastolic blood pressure; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; AST, aspartate transaminase; ALT, alanine transaminase; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin.

Table 2.
Comparison of clinical characteristics between responder and non-responders on pioglitazone up-titration responder, defined as decrease of HbA1c ≥ 1.0% for 6 months
Characteristic Non-responder (n = 31) Responder (n = 14) P-value
Age (y) 60.3 ± 9.8 61.5 ± 10.9 0.719
Men 20 (64.5) 9 (64.3) 1.000
Maximal dosage of SU + MET 20 (64.5) 7 (50.4) 0.512
BMI (kg/m2) 25.8 ± 2.1 26.1 ± 3.5 0.765
Systolic BP (mm Hg) 129.4 ± 14.4 132.0 ± 14.8 0.593
Diastolic BP (mm Hg) 73.1 ± 13.6 72.4 ± 9.4 0.843
Diastolic BP (mm Hg) 73.1 ± 13.6 72.4 ± 9.4 0.843
FPG (mg/dL) 168.3 ± 42.2 155.6 ± 34.5 0.295
HbA1c (%) 8.2 ± 0.7 9.1 ± 0.8 0.001
Serum total cholesterol (mg/dL) 147.8 ± 27.7 151.8 ± 30.3 0.705
Serum LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) 86.3 ± 22.4 92.5 ± 21.4 0.417
Serum HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) 50.5 ± 8.6 48.9 ± 12.7 0.702
Serum triglyceride (mg/dL) 127.6 ± 48.4 142.3 ± 49.1 0.394
Diabetes duration (y) 13.5 ± 6.3 16.8 ± 8.5 0.217

Responder, defined as decrease of HbA1c ≥ 1.0% for 6 months. Value arepressed as mean ± standard deviation or number (%). SU, sulfonylurea; MET, metformin; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein.

Table 3.
Logistic regression analysis for responder on pioglitazone up-titration
Variable Odds ratio (95% CI) P-value
Maximal dosage of SU + MET 0.34 (0.05∼2.52) 0.290
Systolic BP (mm Hg) 0.95 (0.87∼1.04) 0.239
Baseline HbA1c (%) 9.37 (1.84∼47.7) 0.007
Serum LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) 1.02 (0.97∼1.07) 0.491
Serum triglyceride (mg/dL) 1.00 (0.97∼1.02) 0.788
Diabetes duration (y) 1.06 (0.91∼1.23) 0.476

CI, confidence interval; SU, sulfonylurea; MET, metformin; BP, blood pressure; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; LDL, low-density lipoprotein.

TOOLS
Similar articles