PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Abstract
Qualitative research methodology is more recognized and valued in diabetes behavioral research in recent years. This paper reviews the trend of qualitative research about diabetes in Korea and abroad. In Korea, qualitative research is not common, especially for diabetes patients. Qualitative methods help clinicians answer questions that quantitative research may not be able to answer, such as exploring patient motivations, perceptions, and expectations. After reviewing the research in this area, it may provide motivation to researchers in Korea to perform qualitative research to increase understanding of diabetic patients' behavioral patterns.
References
1. Ritholz MD, Beverly EA, Weinger K. Digging deeper: the role of qualitative research in behavioral diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2011. 11:494–502.
2. Hong YH, Kim MA. An analysis of nursing research on diabetes published in Korea from 1981 to 2000. J Korean Acad Fundam Nurs. 2001. 8:416–429.
3. Kim YK, Hwang SY, Shin SJ. Analysis of qualitative research published by Korean Journal of Adult Nursing (1989-2011). Korean J Adult Nurs. 2011. 23:633–641.
4. Mantzoukas S. The research evidence published in high impact nursing journals between 2000 and 2006: a quantitative content analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009. 46:479–489.
5. Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001. 358:483–488.
6. Mason J. Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qual Res. 2006. 6:9–25.
7. Park YS, Choi KS. The experience of patient role in adults with diabetes. Qual Res. 2002. 3:15–26.
8. Lee JS, Ro SO, Shin DS, Kim MH, Jung YM. The experience of life in with diabetics. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2000. 30:1219–1229.
9. Choi SJ. A study on socio-psychological factors related to the dietary compliance of diabetics using qualitative research method [dissertion]. 1998. Seoul (KR): Myong Ji University.
10. Lim JS. A research on low-income diabetes patients about an awareness of diabetes status, diabetes diet and practice of recognition [dissertion]. 2011. Seoul (KR): Ewha Wonans University.
11. Nurmi MA, Stieber-Roger K. Parenting children living with type 1 diabetes: a qualitative study. Diabetes Educ. 2012. 38:530–536.
12. Piana N, Maldonato A, Bloise D, Carboni L, Careddu G, Fraticelli E, Mereu L, Romani G. The narrative-autobiographical approach in the group education of adolescents with diabetes: a qualitative research on its effects. Patient Educ Couns. 2010. 80:56–63.
13. Mishali M, Sominsky L, Heymann AD. Reducing resistance to diabetes treatment using short narrative interventions. Fam Pract. 2010. 27:192–197.
14. Jenkins N, Hallowell N, Farmer AJ, Holman RR, Lawton J. Participants' experiences of intensifying insulin therapy during the Treating to Target in Type 2 Diabetes (4-T) trial: qualitative interview study. Diabet Med. 2011. 28:543–548.
15. Shin JS. Self-care behavior and family support of diabetes mellitus patients with hypoglycemia in emergency rooms [dissertion]. 2008. Seoul (KR): Yonsei University.
16. Goetz K, Szecsenyi J, Campbell S, Rosemann T, Rueter G, Raum E, Brenner H, Miksch A. The importance of social support for people with type 2 diabetes-a qualitative study with general practitioners, practice nurses and patients. Psychosoc Med. 2012. 9:Doc02.
17. Ritholz MD, Beverly EA, Abrahamson MJ, Brooks KM, Hultgren BA, Weinger K. Physicians' perceptions of the type 2 diabetes multi-disciplinary treatment team: a qualitative study. Diabetes Educ. 2011. 37:794–800.
18. Beverly EA, Ritholz MD, Brooks KM, Hultgren BA, Lee Y, Abrahamson MJ, Weinger K. A qualitative study of perceived responsibility and self-blame in type 2 diabetes: reflections of physicians and patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2012. 27:1180–1187.
XML Download