Journal List > Brain Neurorehabil > v.8(1) > 1054754

TOOLS
Ahn and Yoo: Chronometry TMS in Language Network
Review Article

Brain & Neurorehabilitation 2015; 8(1): 34-38.

Published online: 31 March 2015

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12786/bn.2015.8.1.34

Chronometry TMS in Language Network

Hyun Jung Ahn, M.S.2, Woo-Kyoung Yoo, M.D., Ph.D.1, 2

1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Hallym University College of Medicine, Korea.

2Hallym Institute for Interdisciplinary Program Molecular Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Korea.

Correspondence to: Woo-Kyoung Yoo, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hallym University College of Medicine, 896, Pyeongchon-dong, Dongan-gu, Anyang 431-070, Korea. Tel: 031-380-3860, Fax: 031-380-3864, wooky@hallym.ac.kr, mdwooky@gmail.com

Copyright © 2015 Korean Society for Neurorehabilitation

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to introduce a new mapping technique, the chronometry transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), which can be used to delineate detailed time information of specific functioning target network by transiently creating a 'virtual brain lesion', thus disrupting the function of a given cortical target at different time window. Unlike neuroimaging methods such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), chronometry TMS provided information about which language area contributes to performance of some specific task, and at what precise moment the contribution is critical. We shall highlight two aspect of chronometry TMS, that is used in language research either for understanding time course of language processing in normal subject or for measuring plastic reorganization of functioning network.

Keywords: aphasia, functional neuroimaging, neuronal plasticity, time, transcranial magnetic stimulation

Notes

This study was funded by the Government of Korea (NRF-2013R1A1A2012562), and Hallym University Research Fund.

References

1. Amunts K, Schleicher A, Burgel U, Mohlberg H, Uylings HB, Zilles K. Broca's region revisited: cytoarchitecture and intersubject variability. J Comp Neurol. 1999; 412:319–334.
2. Bookheimer S. Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2002; 25:151–188.
3. Hagoort P. On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005; 9:416–423.
4. Poldrack RA, Wagner AD, Prull MW, Desmond JE, Glover GH, Gabrieli JD. Functional specialization for semantic and phonological processing in the left inferior prefrontal cortex. Neuroimage. 1999; 10:15–35.
5. Martin PI, Naeser MA, Theoret H, Tormos JM, Nicholas M, Kurland J, Fregni F, Seekins H, Doron K, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation as a complementary treatment for aphasia. Semin Speech Lang. 2004; 25:181–191.
6. Barwood CH, Murdoch BE, Whelan BM, Lloyd D, Riek S, O'Sullivan J, Coulthard A, Wong A, Aitken P, Hall G. The effects of low frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and sham condition rTMS on behavioural language in chronic non-fluent aphasia: Short term outcomes. NeuroRehabilitation. 2011; 28:113–128.
7. Martin PI, Naeser MA, Ho M, Treglia E, Kaplan E, Baker EH, Pascual-Leone A. Research with transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of aphasia. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2009; 9:451–458.
8. Schneider BM. Focus and selectivity in transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2013; 6:460–461.
9. Silvanto J, Pascual-Leone A. Why the assessment of causality in brain-behavior relations requires brain stimulation. J Cogn Neurosci. 2012; 24:775–777.
10. Price CJ. The anatomy of language: a review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010; 1191:62–88.
11. Schuhmann T, Schiller NO, Goebel R, Sack AT. Speaking of which: dissecting the neurocognitive network of language production in picture naming. Cereb Cortex. 2012; 22:701–709.
12. Sliwinska MW, Khadilkar M, Campbell-Ratcliffe J, Quevenco F, Devlin JT. Early and sustained supramarginal gyrus contributions to phonological processing. Front Psychol. 2012; 3:161.
13. Friederici AD. The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. Physiol Rev. 2011; 91:1357–1392.
14. Neville H, Nicol JL, Barss A, Forster KI, Garrett MF. Syntactically based sentence processing classes: evidence from event-related brain potentials. J Cogn Neurosci. 1991; 3:151–165.
15. Levelt WJM, Schriefer H, Vorberg D, Meyer AS, Pechmann T, Havinga J. The Time Course of Lexical Access in Speech Production: A Study of Picture Naming. Psychological Review. 1991; 98:122–142.
16. Levelt WJ, Praamstra P, Meyer AS, Helenius P, Salmelin R. An MEG study of picture naming. J Cogn Neurosci. 1998; 10:553–567.
17. Azevedo PS, Romão M, Rebelo E. Advantages, Limitations and Solutions in the Use of ERP Systems (Enterprise Resource Planning) - A Case Study in the Hospitality Industry. Procedia Technology. 2012; 5:264–272.
18. Calautti C, Baron JC. Functional neuroimaging studies of motor recovery after stroke in adults: a review. Stroke. 2003; 34:1553–1566.
19. Cramer SC, Nelles G, Benson RR, Kaplan JD, Parker RA, Kwong KK, Kennedy DN, Finklestein SP, Rosen BR. A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke. 1997; 28:2518–2527.
20. Johansen-Berg H, Rushworth MF, Bogdanovic MD, Kischka U, Wimalaratna S, Matthews PM. The role of ipsilateral premotor cortex in hand movement after stroke. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99:14518–14523.
21. Ward NS, Brown MM, Thompson AJ, Frackowiak RS. Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study. Brain. 2003; 126:2476–2496.
22. Thulborn KR, Carpenter PA, Just MA. Plasticity of language-related brain function during recovery from stroke. Stroke. 1999; 30:749–754.
23. Cramer SC, Bastings EP. Mapping clinically relevant plasticity after stroke. Neuropharmacology. 2000; 39:842–851.
24. Barwood CH, Murdoch BE, Whelan BM, Lloyd D, Riek S, JD OS, Coulthard A, Wong A. Improved language performance subsequent to low-frequency rTMS in patients with chronic non-fluent aphasia post-stroke. Eur J Neurol. 2011; 18:935–943.
25. Naeser MA, Martin PI, Nicholas M, Baker EH, Seekins H, Kobayashi M, Theoret H, Fregni F, Maria-Tormos J, Kurland J, Doron KW, Pascual-Leone A. Improved picture naming in chronic aphasia after TMS to part of right Broca's area: an open-protocol study. Brain Lang. 2005; 93:95–105.
26. Naeser MA, Martin PI, Nicholas M, Baker EH, Seekins H, Helm-Estabrooks N, Cayer-Meade C, Kobayashi M, Theoret H, Fregni F, Tormos JM, Kurland J, Doron KW, Pascual-Leone A. Improved naming after TMS treatments in a chronic, global aphasia patient--case report. Neurocase. 2005; 11:182–193.
27. Vuksanovic J, Jelic MB, Milanovic SD, Kacar K, Konstantinovic L, Filipovic SR. Improvement of language functions in a chronic non-fluent post-stroke aphasic patient following bilateral sequential theta burst magnetic stimulation. Neurocase. 2015; 21:244–250.
28. Martin PI, Naeser MA, Ho M, Doron KW, Kurland J, Kaplan J, Wang Y, Nicholas M, Baker EH, Alonso M, Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Overt naming fMRI pre- and post-TMS: Two nonfluent aphasia patients, with and without improved naming post-TMS. Brain Lang. 2009; 111:20–35.
TOOLS
Similar articles