Journal List > Korean J Sports Med > v.36(1) > 1054615

Kim and Choi: Effect of a Specific Rehabilitation Program of Serratus Anterior and Lower Trapezius Muscles for Subacromial Impingement Syndrome on Subacromial Space and the Vascularity of Supraspinatus Tendon

Abstract

Purpose

This study was designed to assess the effects of a rehabilitation program on clinical symptoms, subacromial space parameters and the supraspinatus vascularity in individuals with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS).

Methods

Thirty-five participants (exercise group with SIS [EG]=11, non-exercise group with SIS [NEG]=10, control group [CG]=14) took part in this study. Only EG participated in 6-week rehabilitation program. Outcomes were evaluated at baseline, 6 weeks, and 10 weeks. Changes in symptoms and functional limitations were assessed using Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) questionnaire. Changes in acromiohumeral distance (AHD) and supraspinatus tendon thickness (STT)/AHD were assessed using ultrasonographic measures. Quantitative analysis of tendon blood flow was performed by determining four regions of interest with power Doppler quantification and analysis software to normalize data for interpretation of the mean ratio of colored pixel to the region of interest (vascularization index [VI]) and the intensity per pixel (flow index [FI]).

Results

Following the rehabilitation program, the scores on SPADI were significantly improved (p<0.05). However, AHD, STT/AHD, VI, and FI indicated no significant difference within groups or interactions of time and group in between groups.

Conclusion

The rehabilitation program yielded improvements in symptoms, but not in subacromial parameters and the vascularity of supraspinatus in participants with SIS.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

Measurement of supraspinatus tendon.

kjsm-36-34-g001
Fig. 2

Measurement of acromiohumeral distance (A) and position (B).

kjsm-36-34-g002
Fig. 3

QLAB analysis of power Doppler ultrasound of supraspinatus tendon.

kjsm-36-34-g003
Fig. 4

Rehabilitation program. (A) Robbery exercise for lower trapezius. (B) Lawn mower exercise for lower trapezius. (C) Low exercise for lower trapezius. (D) Inferior glide exercise for lower trapezius. (E) Prone shoulder flexion at 135° abduction for lower trapezius. (F) Push-ups with a plus for serratus anterior.

kjsm-36-34-g004
Table 1

Characteristics of participants

kjsm-36-34-i001

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

EG: exercise group, NEG: non-exercise group, CG: control group.

Table 2

Comparison of Shoulder Pain and Disability Index score between groups at baseline and after rehabilitation program

kjsm-36-34-i002

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

EG: exercise group, NEG: non-exercise group, CG: control group.

*p<0.05, compared to baseline; p<0.05, compared to NEG.

Table 3

STT and AHD according to arm position

kjsm-36-34-i003

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

STT: supraspinatus tendon thickness, AHD: acromiohumeral distance, EG: exercise group, NEG: non-exercise group, CG: control group.

Table 4

The ratio of STT/AHD according to arm position

kjsm-36-34-i004

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

STT: supraspinatus tendon thickness, AHD: acromiohumeral distance, EG: exercise group, NEG: non-exercise group, CG: control group.

Table 5

The QLAB analysis of power Doppler ultrasound in bursal lateral region of supraspinatus tendon

kjsm-36-34-i005

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

VI: vascularization index, EG: exercise group, NEG: non-exercise group, CG: control group, FI: flow index, VFI: vascularization flow index.

Table 6

The QLAB analysis of power Doppler ultrasound in articular lateral region of supraspinatus tendon

kjsm-36-34-i006

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

VI: vascularization index, EG: exercise group, NEG: non-exercise group, CG: control group, FI: flow index, VFI: vascularization flow index.

Table 7

The QLAB analysis of power Doppler ultrasound in bursal medial region of supraspinatus tendon

kjsm-36-34-i007

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

VI: vascularization index, EG: exercise group, NEG: non-exercise group, CG: control group, FI: flow index, VFI: vascularization flow index.

Table 8

The QLAB analysis of power Doppler ultrasound in articular medial region of supraspinatus tendon

kjsm-36-34-i008

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

VI: vascularization index, EG: exercise group, NEG: non-exercise group, CG: control group, FI: flow index, VFI: vascularization flow index.

Notes

Conflict of Interest No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2015S1A5A8014725).

References

1. Seitz AL, McClure PW, Finucane S, Boardman ND 3rd, Michener LA. Mechanisms of rotator cuff tendinopathy: intrinsic, extrinsic, or both? Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2011; 26:1–12.
crossref
2. Hegedus EJ, Cook C, Brennan M, Wyland D, Garrison JC, Driesner D. Vascularity and tendon pathology in the rotator cuff: a review of literature and implications for rehabilitation and surgery. Br J Sports Med. 2010; 44:838–847.
crossref
3. Lewis JS. Rotator cuff tendinopathy: a model for the continuum of pathology and related management. Br J Sports Med. 2010; 44:918–923.
crossref
4. Codman EA. The shoulder: rupture of the supraspinatus tendon and other lesions in or about the subacromial bursa. Brevard County: Krieger;1934.
5. Roy JS, Moffet H, McFadyen BJ. Upper limb motor strategies in persons with and without shoulder impingement syndrome across different speeds of movement. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008; 23:1227–1236.
crossref
6. Ludewig PM, Reynolds JF. The association of scapular kinematics and glenohumeral joint pathologies. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009; 39:90–104.
crossref
7. Roy JS, Moffet H, Hebert LJ, Lirette R. Effect of motor control and strengthening exercises on shoulder function in persons with impingement syndrome: a single-subject study design. Man Ther. 2009; 14:180–188.
crossref
8. Worsley P, Warner M, Mottram S, et al. Motor control retraining exercises for shoulder impingement: effects on function, muscle activation, and biomechanics in young adults. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22:e11–e19.
crossref
9. Desmeules F, Minville L, Riederer B, Cote CH, Fremont P. Acromio-humeral distance variation measured by ultrasonography and its association with the outcome of rehabilitation for shoulder impingement syndrome. Clin J Sport Med. 2004; 14:197–205.
crossref
10. Savoie A, Mercier C, Desmeules F, Fremont P, Roy JS. Effects of a movement training oriented rehabilitation program on symptoms, functional limitations and acromiohumeral distance in individuals with subacromial pain syndrome. Man Ther. 2015; 20:703–708.
crossref
11. Goodmurphy CW, Osborn J, Akesson EJ, Johnson S, Stanescu V, Regan WD. An immunocytochemical analysis of torn rotator cuff tendon taken at the time of repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003; 12:368–374.
crossref
12. Rudzki JR, Adler RS, Warren RF, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound characterization of the vascularity of the rotator cuff tendon: age- and activity-related changes in the intact asymptomatic rotator cuff. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008; 17:1 Suppl. 96S–100S.
crossref
13. Levy O, Relwani J, Zaman T, Even T, Venkateswaran B, Copeland S. Measurement of blood flow in the rotator cuff using laser Doppler flowmetry. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90:893–898.
crossref
14. Longo UG, Franceschi F, Ruzzini L, Rabitti C, Morini S, Maffulli N, et al. Histopathology of the supraspinatus tendon in rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med. 2008; 36:533–538.
crossref
15. Adler RS, Fealy S, Rudzki JR, et al. Rotator cuff in asymptomatic volunteers: contrast-enhanced US depiction of intratendinous and peritendinous vascularity. Radiology. 2008; 248:954–961.
crossref
16. Pappas GP, Blemker SS, Beaulieu CF, McAdams TR, Whalen ST, Gold GE. In vivo anatomy of the Neer and Hawkins sign positions for shoulder impingement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006; 15:40–49.
crossref
17. Michener LA, Subasi Yesilyaprak SS, Seitz AL, Timmons MK, Walsworth MK. Supraspinatus tendon and subacromial space parameters measured on ultrasonographic imaging in subacromial impingement syndrome. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015; 23:363–369.
crossref
18. McClure P, Michener L. Measures of adult shoulder function: the American shoulder and elbow surgeons standardized shoulder form patient self report section (ASES), disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH), shoulder disability questionnaire, shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI), and simple shoulder test. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2003; 49:S50–S58.
19. Bigliani LU, Levine WN. Subacromial impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997; 79:1854–1868.
20. Chen SK, Simonian PT, Wickiewicz TL, Otis JC, Warren RF. Radiographic evaluation of glenohumeral kinematics: a muscle fatigue model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999; 8:49–52.
crossref
21. Green S, Buchbinder R, Hetrick S. Physiotherapy interventions for shoulder pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003; (2):CD004258.
crossref
22. Girometti R, De Candia A, Sbuelz M, Toso F, Zuiani C, Bazzocchi M. Supraspinatus tendon US morphology in basketball players: correlation with main pathologic models of secondary impingement syndrome in young overhead athletes: preliminary report. Radiol Med. 2006; 111:42–52.
crossref
23. Cholewinski JJ, Kusz DJ, Wojciechowski P, Cielinski LS, Zoladz MP. Ultrasound measurement of rotator cuff thickness and acromio-humeral distance in the diagnosis of subacromial impingement syndrome of the shoulder. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008; 16:408–414.
crossref
24. Azzoni R, Cabitza P, Parrini M. Sonographic evaluation of subacromial space. Ultrasonics. 2004; 42:683–687.
crossref
25. Graichen H, Bonel H, Stammberger T, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of the width of the subacromial space in healthy subjects and patients with impingement syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999; 172:1081–1086.
crossref
26. Hebert LJ, Moffet H, Dufour M, Moisan C. Acromiohumeral distance in a seated position in persons with impingement syndrome. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003; 18:72–79.
27. Maenhout A, Van Eessel V, Van Dyck L, Vanraes A, Cools A. Quantifying acromiohumeral distance in overhead athletes with glenohumeral internal rotation loss and the influence of a stretching program. Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40:2105–2112.
crossref
28. Soslowsky LJ, Thomopoulos S, Tun S, et al. Neer Award 1999: overuse activity injures the supraspinatus tendon in an animal model: a histologic and biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000; 9:79–84.
crossref
29. Carpenter JE, Flanagan CL, Thomopoulos S, Yian EH, Soslowsky LJ. The effects of overuse combined with intrinsic or extrinsic alterations in an animal model of rotator cuff tendinosis. Am J Sports Med. 1998; 26:801–807.
30. McCreesh KM, Riley SJ, Crotty JM. Neovascularity in patellar tendinopathy and the response to eccentric training: a case report using Power Doppler ultrasound. Man Ther. 2013; 18:602–605.
TOOLS
Similar articles