Journal List > Korean J Sports Med > v.29(1) > 1054465

Park, Bang, Kim, Kim, Lee, and Shin: Effect of Posture on Muscle Activity and Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometer

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of saddle height on the muscle activity and oxygen uptake during bicycling. The subjects were 20 young adult volunteers. Muscle activity and oxygen uptake were measured with the two saddle heights (maximum knee extension of 180o and 120o) and at two power outputs (70 and 100 watts, respectively.) The pedaling rate was 40 rpm. The exercise time was 1 minute and the resting time between each condition was 3 minutes. The raw electromyogram activity was measured for 1 minute and was converted to a root mean square value. Oxygen uptake was measured during exercise using the mixing chamber mode. The activities of two flexors (the medial hamstring and medial head of gastrocnemius) increased at the high saddle height and the activities of four extensors (rectus femoris, vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, and tibialis anterior) increased at the low saddle height. The oxygen uptake at the low saddle height was significantly higher than that at the high saddle height. The oxygen uptake positively correlated with the muscle activities of the knee extensors. The muscle activity and oxygen uptake were significantly affected by the postures (saddle heights) in cycle ergometer. The postures should be considered in the exercise test and prescription.

References

1. Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bricker JT, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). Circulation. 2002; 106:1883–92.
2. Houtz SJ, Fischer FJ. An analysis of muscle action and joint excursion during exercise on a stationary bicycle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1959; 41:123–31.
crossref
3. Ericson M. On the biomechanics of cycling. A study of joint and muscle load during exercise on the bicycle ergometer. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl. 1986; 16:1–43.
4. Takaishi T, Yamamoto T, Ono T, Ito T, Moritani T. Neuromuscular, metabolic, and kinetic adaptations for skilled pedaling performance in cyclists. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998; 30:442–9.
crossref
5. Cruz CF, Bankoff AD. Electromyography in cycling: difference between clipless pedal and toe clip pedal. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2001; 41:247–52.
6. Bigland-Ritchie B, Woods JJ. Integrated EMG and oxygen uptake during dynamic contractions of human muscles. J Appl Physiol. 1974; 36:475–9.
crossref
7. Takaishi T, Yasuda Y, Ono T, Moritani T. Optimal pedaling rate estimated from neuromuscular fatigue for cyclists. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996; 28:1492–7.
crossref
8. Hug F, Bendahan D, Le Fur Y, Cozzone PJ, Grélot L. Heterogeneity of muscle recruitment pattern during pedaling in professional road cyclists: a magnetic resonance imaging and electromyography study. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004; 92:334–42.
crossref
9. Fletcher GF, Balady GJ, Amsterdam EA, et al. Exercise standards for testing and training: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2001; 104:1694–740.
10. Li L, Caldwell GE. Muscle coordination in cycling: effect of surface incline and posture. J Appl Physiol. 1998; 85:927–34.
crossref
11. Marsh AP, Martin PE. The relationship between cadence and lower extremity EMG in cyclists and noncyclists. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995; 27:217–25.
crossref
12. Sarre G, Lepers R, Maffiuletti N, Millet G, Martin A. Influence of cycling cadence on neuromuscular activity of the knee extensors in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003; 88:476–9.
crossref
13. MacIntosh BR, Neptune RR, Horton JF. Cadence, power, and muscle activation in cycle ergometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000; 32:1281–7.
crossref
14. Coast JR, Welch HG. Linear increase in optimal pedal rate with increased power output in cycle ergometry. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1985; 53:339–42.
crossref

Table 1.
Muscle activity in maximum knee extension of 180 o and 120 o at two power outputs (70 and 100 W)
Muscle Maximum knee extension angle (o) Power output 70 W Power output 100 W
Rectus femoris 180 2,469±886 3,191±1,028
  120 2,743±995 3,580±1,304
Vastus medialis 180 3,618±1,399 5,040±1,883
  120 3,752±1,520 5,691±2,607
Vastus lateralis 180 3,132±908 4,483±1,111
  120 3,284±1,032 4,889±1,460
Medial hamstring 180 2,578±1,023 2,728±1,157
  120 2,071±968 2,487±1,093
Medial head of gastrocnemius 180 3,081±1,393 3,129±1,417
  120 2,009±986 2,251±1,067
Tibialis anterior 180 2,735±1,072 3,008±1,007
  120 3,023±1,193 3,545±1,353

Values are mean±standard deviation (μ Vs).

p<0.05, maximum knee extension of 180

o vs 120

o .

Table 2.
Oxygen consumption in maximum knee extension of 180o and 120o at two power outputs (70 and 100 W)
  Power output 70 W Power output 100 W
Knee angle 180 o 14.1±2.3 18.0±2.5
Knee angle 120 o 15.2±2.2 18.8±2.4

Values are mean±standard deviation (mL/kg/min).

p<0.05: represents the significant difference in VO2 between the two knee angles at the two workloads, res-pectively.

Table 3.
Relationship between muscle activities and oxygen consumption for different conditions
VO2 RF VM VL SUM MH GM TA
Power 70 W Knee angle 180 o 0.461 0.354 0.396 0.459 –0.170 –0.055 –0.145
Power 100 W Knee angle 180 o 0.504 0.319 0.480 0.488 0.117 –0.091 –0.343
Power 70 W Knee angle 120 o 0.420 0.591 0.673 0.640 –0.117 –0.294 –0.179
Power 100 W Knee angle 120 o 0.465 0.416 0.680 0.583 0.146 –0.277 –0.274

Pearson's correlation coefficient. RF: rectus femoris, VM: vastus medialis, VL: vastus lateralis, MH: medial hamstring, GM: medial head of gastrocnemius, TA: tibialis anterior.

p<0.05.

SUM: summed RMS values of RF, VM, and VL.

TOOLS
Similar articles