Journal List > Korean J Sports Med > v.29(1) > 1054463

Lee, Ha, Yu, Lee, Nam, and Song: Percutaneous Cannulated Screw Fixation of Fifth Proximal Metatarsal Stress Fracture in Athletes

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to know utility of percutaneous cannulated screw fixation of fifth proximal metatarsal stress fractures in athletes by assessment of radiological and clinical outcome. This study examined clinical and radiological union time of eleven cases of percutaneous screw fixation, which used the 4.0 mm cannulated screw, of fifth proximal metatarsal stress fracture in athletes. Type I of Torg classification is 7 cases, type II is 3 cases and type III is 1 case. All the cases showed fracture union, and all the patients resumed their athletics at the final follow-up. None of the cases complained of refracture or pain around where they had surgery, and visual analogue scale of pain, and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society score was 0.73 and 93.4. The results of the study confirm that percutaneous screw fixation, which used the cannulated screw, of fifth proximal metatarsal stress fracture would help athletes resume their athletics in early stages.

References

1. Larson CM, Almekinders LC, Taft TN, Garrett WE. Intramedullary screw fixation of Jones fractures. Analysis of failure. Am J Sports Med. 2002; 30:55–60.
2. Hatch RL, Alsobrook JA, Clugston JR. Diagnosis and management of metatarsal fractures. Am Fam Physician. 2007; 76:817–26.
3. Kavanaugh JH, Brower TD, Mann RV. The Jones fracture revisited. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978; 60:776–82.
crossref
4. DeLee JC, Evans JP, Julian J. Stress fracture of the fifth metatarsal. Am J Sports Med. 1983; 11:349–53.
crossref
5. Mologne TS, Lundeen JM, Clapper MF, O'Brien TJ. Early screw fixation versus casting in the treatment of acute Jones fractures. Am J Sports Med. 2005; 33:970–5.
crossref
6. Wright RW, Fischer DA, Shively RA, Heidt RS Jr, Nuber GW. Refracture of proximal fifth metatarsal (Jones) fracture after intramedullary screw fixation in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2000; 28:732–6.
7. Weinfeld SB, Haddad SL, Myerson MS. Metatarsal stress fractures. Clin Sports Med. 1997; 16:319–38.
crossref
8. Torg JS, Balduini FC, Zelko RR, Pavlov H, Peff TC, Das M. Fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal distal to the tuberosity. Classification and guidelines for nonsurgical and surgical management. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984; 66:209–14.
crossref
9. Porter DA, Duncan M, Meyer SJ. Fifth metatarsal Jones fracture fixation with a 4.5-mm cannulated stainless steel screw in the competitive and recreational athlete: a clinical and radiographic evaluation. Am J Sports Med. 2005; 33:726–33.
10. Pietropaoli MP, Wnorowski DC, Werner FW, Fortino MD. Intramedullary screw fixation of Jones fractures: a biomechanical study. Foot Ankle Int. 1999; 20:560–3.
crossref
11. Nunley JA. Fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal: the Jones fracture. Orthop Clin North Am. 2001; 32:171–80.
12. Shah SN, Knoblich GO, Lindsey DP, Kreshak J, Yerby SA, Chou LB. Intramedullary screw fixation of proximal fifth metatarsal fractures: a biomechanical study. Foot Ankle Int. 2001; 22:581–4.
crossref

Fig. 1.
Twenty-year-old male soccer player, X-ray reveals Torg classification type 1. (A) Before operation. (B) After operation. (C) One month after operation. (D) Three months after operation.
kjsm-29-21f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Nineteen-year-old male soccer player, X-ray re-veals Torg classification type 2. (A) Before operation. (B) After operation. (C) Two months after operation. (D) Four months after operation.
kjsm-29-21f2.tif
Table 1.
Athlete information for open reduction and internal fixation of the fifth metatarsal
No. Sex Age Foot Height (cm) Weight (kg) ) Torg CPA (o) HA (o) TC (o) ID (mm) AOFAS VAS Athletics
1 F 20 Lt. 178 70 1 30.2 4.5 22 3.8 92 0 TE
2 M 21 Rt. 180 75 1 29.4 6.5 24 4.1 93 1 BS
3 M 22 Rt. 170 64 1 28.4 5 27 4.5 92 0 BS
4 F 25 Lt. 178 51 1 28.4 4 19 4.0 95 1 BK
5 M 20 Rt. 182 65 1 25.5 5.5 32 3.9 98 2 BK
6 M 22 Lt. 188 62 3 29 4 28 4.6 93 1 BK
7 M 18 Lt. 179 71 1 31.8 4 26 4.4 94 0 SC
8 M 18 Lt. 181 78 2 30.7 5 25 4.7 93 1 SC
9 M 20 Rt. 179 70 2 31.7 8 30 4.8 94 2 SC
10 M 18 Lt. 179 63 1 40 5 32 4.3 92 0 SC
11 M 19 Lt. 176 68 2 27.5 6 26 4.2 92 0 SC

Torg: Torg classification, CPA: calcaneal pitch angle, HA: hind foot angle, TC: talocalcaneal angle, ID: intramedullary diameter, AOFAS: American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society, VAS: visual analogue scale of pain, TE: tennis, BS: baseball, BK: basketball, SC: soccer.

TOOLS
Similar articles