Abstract
PURPOSE
To compare the effect of sodium hypochlorite and microwave disinfection on the dimensional stability of denture bases without and with relining.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A brass die was prepared by simulating an edentulous maxillary arch. It was used to fabricate 1.5 mm and 3 mm of thickness denture bases (n = 40). The 1.5 mm of thickness-specimens (n = 20) were relined with 1.5 mm of autopolymerizing relining resin. Five holes were prepared over crest of ridge of brass die with intimately fitting stainless steel pins which were transferred to the intaglio surface of specimens during fabrication of denture bases. For calculation of dimensional changes in denture bases, differences between the baseline area before and after disinfection of the specimens were used. The denture bases without and with relining were divided into 2 groups (each n = 20). Data were analyzed using student paired 't' and unpaired 't' test.
RESULTS
Microwave disinfection produces significant shrinkage in both denture bases without relining (t = 17.16; P<.001) and with relining (t = 14.9; P<.001). Denture bases without relining showed more shrinkage when compared with relined denture bases after microwave disinfection (t = 6.09; P<.001). The changes in dimensional stability after sodium hypochlorite disinfection were not significant for both denture bases without relining (t = 2.19; P=.056) and denture bases with relining (t = 2.17; P=.058).
Dental prostheses are exposed to normal oral microbial flora such as viruses, bacteria, and fungi. While adjusting or repairing these prosthesis, dental personnel may be at risk of acquiring infections.1-3 Adequate maintenance of removable prostheses is necessary for denture wearers to have an esthetic, odor free appliance and good oral health. Oral problems related to poor hygiene of dentures indicate the needs to establish a disinfection protocol that is effective, clinically viable, inexpensive and easy to comply with. Several studies have focused on disinfection of dental prostheses. Chemical disinfection of dentures is commonly achieved by soaking it in an alkaline glutaraldehyde, sodium hypochlorite, aqueous formaldehyde or enzymatic solutions.4 More recently, microwave irradiation also being considered as one of the method of denture sterilization/disinfection instead of chemical solutions because it requires no special storage, has no expiration date and does not induce resistance to Candida albicans.5 The available disinfection methods for complete dentures are still controversial because they might alter some material properties like color, hardness, roughness, dimensional stability, and flexural properties which may have an influence on the clinical outcome.6
Retention of denture is one of the important factors for the preservation and health of underlying tissues. This can be achieved by intimate adaptation of denture base to its underlying supporting structure. During its use, in addition, progressive alveolar resorption may affect retention and stability of dentures. In order to enhance the adaptation of denture, it needs to be relined or remade. The simple way to readapt the denture base to its supporting tissues by using the autopolymerizing relines acrylic resins.7 Ideally, a disinfection method should not affect properties of the denture base and denture relining materials. To the best of our knowledge, there is no study that reports effect of sodium hypochlorite on dimensional stability of acrylic resin. The studies on the effect of microwave disinfection methods on dimensional stability of acrylic resin showed conflicting results. Some studies reported that microwave disinfection caused changes in dimensional stability,5-8 while others did not report any change in dimensional stability.9-12 Hence, this study was aimed to comparatively evaluate the effect of sodium hypochlorite and microwave disinfection on the dimensional stability of denture bases without relining and denture bases with relining.
One autopolymerizing reline resin (Ufi Gel hard C, Voco, Germany) and a heat-polymerized acrylic resin (DPI, Dental materials, Mumbai, India) was selected for the study. Ufi Gel hard C is direct hard permanent relining material mixed from the cartridge, which is composed of polymethacrylate. It is free from methylmethacrylate. In total, 40 test denture bases were fabricated. Out of which, 20 denture bases were without relining and 20 denture bases were with relining. A brass die was prepared by simulating an edentulous maxillary arch without any undercuts. It was used to fabricate denture bases without and with relining (Fig. 1). Five parallel holes were made to determine the linear dimensional stability. Each of which was 3-mm-deep and 2.1-mm in diameter at five locations viz. at midline, canine and first molar region on both side on the crest of the ridge of brass die. The pins (2.0 mm×4.5 mm) with pointed head having intimate fit were used to serve as reference points as A, B, C, D and E.
Silicone 'mould-1' using the brass die was prepared in vinylpolysiloxane duplicating material which was used to get such 40 identical master stone cast (Fig. 2). A denture base wax pattern was prepared on the standard brass cast die having 3 mm of thickness using base plate wax for the fabrication of denture bases without relining. To allow the fabrication of the denture bases without relining, a denture base pattern was waxed on the brass standard cast with 3 mm thick base plate wax. A new 'mould-2' was prepared using the master dies having wax spacer of 3 mm-thickness adapted over it and vinylpolysiloxane duplicating material (Fig. 3). This mould was used to prepare all twenty 3 mm denture bases. Two holes 'a' and 'b' approximately of 3 mm diameter were prepared in the 'mould-2' for injection and drainage of excess wax. The master stone cast was then positioned in silicone 'mould-2'. Master stone cast was identical to brass die. So there was 3 mm space between stone cast and mould-2, which was filled by injecting molten was through hole 'a'. Similar procedure was followed to obtain all twenty 3 mm tip wax patterns. Then all wax patterns of denture bases along with its corresponding cast was flasked in Type III dental stone using conventional flasking procedures. Dewaxing was done after one hour. To ensure the complete removal of wax, the cast was cleaned with boiling water and liquid soap. Polymer and monomer was then taken in the ratio of 3:1 by volume and mixed to get acrylic dough, which was then packed in to the mould. After trial packing, the pins were placed in the holes such that their heads should be towards the cast holes (Fig. 4). Final closure of the flask was done under the hydraulic press using 1100 kg pressure and kept for 2 hours under the same pressure. The test denture base was polymerized utilizing long curing cycle for 8 hours at 74℃ temperature. The flask was opened after bench cooling. The test denture base along with the master stone cast was retrieved carefully and finished (Fig. 5). It was then polished following the standard procedure and kept in the distilled water at 37±1℃ for 8 days in incubator before subjecting to disinfection procedure.
For the fabrication of relined denture base specimens, 1.5 mm-thick base plate wax was adapted over the standard brass cast. This master die with the adapted wax was used to prepare another silicone 'mould-3', which was used to obtain 20 stone casts (Fig. 6). These casts were 1.5 mm larger than the master brass die on tissue surface. Melted wax was injected in silicone 'mould-1' to get 1.5 mm thick denture base. The 1.5 mm-spaced dental stone cast was placed into the mould to get 1.5 mm-thick-waxed record base. The 1.5 mm-wax denture base along with its respective cast was flasked with dental stone as previously described. These denture bases were stored in water at 37±1℃ for 8 days and then submitted to relining procedure. These denture bases having 1.5 mm-thickness were returned to the master stone casts and were sealed using wax. Flasking procedure was done as described previously. Dewaxing procedure was completed to eliminate all wax around the denture bases. The pins were then placed in the holes on the crest of the ridge following similar procedure described earlier. The bonding agents for Ufi Gel hard C were applied on the intaglio surface of the denture base. The reaction time 30 seconds was given before addition of the resin. The relining resin was injected onto the intaglio surface reline area of treated denture base with automixing gun. The flask closure was completed and adjusted over the hydraulic press to deliver a pressure of 450 kg for 7 minutes till polymerization of relined material occurred. Such twenty relined denture bases were prepared using similar procedure (Fig. 7). These denture bases were kept in distilled water at 37±1℃ for 8 days in incubator before subjecting to disinfection procedure.
All specimens (n = 40) were divided into two groups (n = 20) as follows:
For sodium hypochlorite disinfection, freshly prepared 0.525% of sodium hypochlorite was used. Each sample was then kept in 200 ml of 0.525% of sodium hypochlorite for 10 minutes.13 For microwave disinfection, a domestic microwave oven was used for carrying out disinfection of the samples. A sample was kept in 200 ml of distilled water and then oven was set at 650 W for 6 minutes.14 After every disinfection procedure, the measurements between reference pins were taken before and immediately after disinfection procedure. Travelling microscope was used to measure the distance between the selected reference points. Single operator did all measurements by taking into account the least count of 0.01 mm of travelling microscope. To calculate the baseline area ABDCEA, we added the area of 3 triangles viz. ΔABC, ΔADE, and ΔACE of each sample denture base before and after disinfection. The area of each triangle with unequal sides was calculated using the following equation.7,15,16
Δ = √S (S - P) (S - Q) (S - R)
Where S = (P + Q + R) / 2
And P, Q, and R are the lengths of the sides of the triangle.
All the data were subjected to statistical analysis. Computation was done by SPSS 17.0 software for windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Comparative evaluation was done in between the test groups, 1) disinfection by sodium hypochlorite and 2) disinfection carried out using microwave for both denture bases without and with relining. The descriptive analysis was done to obtain mean and standard deviation of surface area of denture bases. The paired 't' test was carried out to evaluate the effect of disinfection methods on dimensional stability before and after the disinfection procedure (i.e. comparison within the same group of disinfection methods). The unpaired 't' test was done to compare the dimensional changes between two different disinfection methods (i.e. comparison between sodium hypochlorite and microwave disinfection methods).
Table 1 shows the difference in total surface areas before and after sodium hypochlorite and microwave disinfection of denture bases without and with relining. Table 2 shows the effect of sodium hypochlorite and microwave disinfection on dimensional stability of denture bases with and without relining. After sodium hypochlorite disinfection, this difference was not significant for both denture bases without relining (t = 2.19; P=.056) and denture bases with relining (t = 2.17; P=.058) (Fig. 8). While after microwave disinfection, this difference was highly significant for both denture bases without relining (t = 17.16; P<.001) and denture bases with relining (t = 14.90; P<.001) (Fig. 9). Table 3 shows the comparison of dimensional stability of denture bases without and with relining after disinfection by sodium hypochlorite and microwave disinfection. This clearly shows that the microwave disinfection produced significant change in dimensional stability of denture bases without relining when compared with dimensional stability of denture bases with relining (t = 6.09; P<.001) (Fig. 10).
The main results of this study showed that microwave disinfection produced significant changes in dimensional stability of denture bases without relining and denture bases with relining when compared with sodium hypochlorite disinfection.
Microwave disinfection caused overall shrinkage of denture bases with and without relining which is suggestive of the structural changes that occurred inside the resin bases subjected to microwave irradiation protocol (650 W for 6 minutes). Previous study showed that the distortion of acrylic resins occurred when heated from 71℃ to 90℃.17 Approximately after 90 seconds, water started to boil during microwave disinfection.14 This may cause diffusion of remaining residual monomer molecules in to the active sites of the polymer chain. Due to this, there might be further polymerization which lead to increase in linear dimensional change (shrinkage) of relined and without relined denture bases. The relined denture bases showed significantly less shrinkage compared with denture bases without relining. It might be due to the chemical composition of reline materials. This relined material contains 1, 6 hexanediol dimethacrylate, a cross-linking agent in higher percentage. The 1, 6 hexanediol dimethacrylate enhances a higher degree of conversion than the monofunctional monomers.7 Shrinkage in denture bases might be caused by release of inherent stresses that were produced during polymerization. After relining, the magnitude of this effect was less, as denture base used for relining had reduced thickness. We used 650 W for 6 minutes for microwave disinfection as it was recommended as an effective method for disinfection of acrylic dentures along with the treatment of denture stomatitis and Candidiasis.14
Our results replicated the previous finding that the microwave disinfection significantly changes the dimensional stability of denture base resin.5,7,8 Microwave disinfection leads to linear dimensional alteration of complete dentures in horizontal and vertical directions. When compared differences in wattages i.e. 604 W for 6 minutes and 331 W for 6 minutes, reduced wattage causes less alteration in dimensional stability of acrylic resin.18 The microwave disinfection lead to significant alterations in the adaptation of maxillary acrylic resin denture bases to the stone casts at 604 W for 10 minutes, but 500 W for 3 minutes did not alter their fitting and stability.6 Thus, dimensional stability of acrylic resin denture bases after microwave disinfection depends on time of exposure and wattage used.
The results in this study are in disagreement with the findings of some of the previous studies that dimensional stability of acrylic resins was not affected by microwave disinfection. This might be due to the use of different materials and methods to measure distortion and irradiation protocols (power and time).9-12
The strength of this study was the specimens which were closely simulating clinical conditions. Asymmetric distortion might be caused due to the complex design of a denture bases. This might not be apparent if we only evaluate simple-shaped specimens. The limitation of this study was that this study evaluated the effect on only one denture base material and relined material. In addition, only one variety of microwave irradiation protocol and one type of concentration of sodium hypochlorite disinfectant were used for disinfecting the samples. Future studies are needed to evaluate the effect of various types of disinfection methods on different denture base and relined material with different concentration and disinfection protocols.
Within the scope and limitation of this study, it was concluded that the changes in dimensional stability of denture bases without relining and denture bases with relining were significant after microwave disinfection (650 W for 6 minutes) as compared to sodium hypochlorite disinfection (0.525% sodium hypochlorite for 10 minutes). Denture bases without relining showed more dimensional changes significantly than relined denture bases after microwave disinfection. Hence, chemical disinfection seems to be a safer method of disinfecting dentures in comparison with microwave irradiation, as disinfection by microwave irradiation causes alteration with regards to physical properties such as changes in dimensional stability.
Figures and Tables
References
1. Asad T, Watkinson AC, Huggett R. The effects of various disinfectant solutions on the surface hardness of an acrylic resin denture base material. Int J Prosthodont. 1993. 6:9–12.
2. Vig RG. Reducing laboratory aerosol contamination. J Prosthet Dent. 1969. 22:156–157.
3. Katberg JW Jr. Cross-contamination via the prosthodontic laboratory. J Prosthet Dent. 1974. 32:412–419.
4. Shen C, Javid NS, Colaizzi FA. The effect of glutaraldehyde base disinfectants on denture base resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1989. 61:583–589.
5. Sartori EA, Schmidt CB, Walber LF, Shinkai RS. Effect of microwave disinfection on denture base adaptation and resin surface roughness. Braz Dent J. 2006. 17:195–200.
6. Pavan S, Arioli Filho JN, Dos Santos PH, Mollo Fde A Jr. Effect of microwave treatments on dimensional accuracy of maxillary acrylic resin denture base. Braz Dent J. 2005. 16:119–123.
7. Seo RS, Vergani CE, Pavarina AC, Compagnoni MA, Machado AL. Influence of microwave disinfection on the dimensional stability of intact and relined acrylic resin denture bases. J Prosthet Dent. 2007. 98:216–223.
8. Hussen AM, Rejab LT, Abbood LN. The effect of microwave disinfection on the dimensional change of acrylic resins. Al-Rafidain Dent J. 2008. 8:38–43.
9. Rohrer MD, Bulard RA. Microwave sterilization. J Am Dent Assoc. 1985. 110:194–198.
10. Burns DR, Kazanoglu A, Moon PC, Gunsolley JC. Dimensional stability of acrylic resin materials after microwave sterilization. Int J Prosthodont. 1990. 3:489–493.
11. Polyzois GL, Zissis AJ, Yannikakis SA. The effect of glutaraldehyde and microwave disinfection on some properties of acrylic denture resin. Int J Prosthodont. 1995. 8:150–154.
12. Consani RL, Iwasaki RY, Mesquita MF, Mendes WB, Consani S. Effect of repeated simulated disinfections by microwave energy on the complete denture base adaptation. Open Dent J. 2008. 2:61–66.
13. Council on Dental Therapeutics. Council on Prosthetic Services and Dental Laboratory Relations. Guidelines for infection control in the dental office and the commercial dental laboratory. J Am Dent Assoc. 1985. 110:969–972.
14. Neppelenbroek KH, Pavarina AC, Spolidorio DM, Vergani CE, Mima EG, Machado AL. Effectiveness of microwave sterilization on three hard chairside reline resins. Int J Prosthodont. 2003. 16:616–620.
15. Huggett R, Zissis A, Harrison A, Dennis A. Dimensional accuracy and stability of acrylic resin denture bases. J Prosthet Dent. 1992. 68:634–640.
16. Polychronakis N, Yannikakis S, Zissis A. A clinical 5-year longitudinal study on the dimensional changes of complete maxillary dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2003. 16:78–81.
17. Craig RC. Prosthetic applications of polymers in Restorative dental materials. 1997. 12th ed. St. Louis: Mosby;513–547.
18. Thomas CJ, Webb BC. Microwaving of acrylic resin dentures. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 1995. 3:179–182.