Journal List > Lab Anim Res > v.31(3) > 1053816

Song, Shin, Hwang, and Jang: Effects of lutein or lutein in combination with vitamin C on mRNA expression and activity of antioxidant enzymes and status of the antioxidant system in SD rats

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of lutein alone or in combination with vitamin C on the antioxidant defense system in rats. A total of 18 eight-week-old male Sprague Dawley (SD) rats were randomly assigned to three groups for 4 weeks: control (CON), lutein (LUT, 50 mg lutein/kg BW) and lutein plus vitamin C (LVC, 50 mg lutein/kg BW+1,000 mg vitamin C/kg BW). No differences in body weight, relative live weight or plasma biochemical profiles were observed among treatment groups. In the hepatic antioxidant defense systems, the mRNA expression of superoxide dismutase (SOD) in the LUT and LVC groups was significantly (P<0.05) higher than that in the CON group, whereas the mRNA level of glutathione peroxidase (GPX), catalase (CAT) and glutathione S-transferase (GST) was not affected by the administration of antioxidants. SOD and GST activities in the LUT and LVC groups were significantly higher (P<0.05) than those in the CON group, whereas GPX, CAT and lipid peroxidation did not differ among groups. In addition, the LVC group showed a significant (P<0.05) increase in plasma and hepatic total antioxidant power (TAP) relative to the CON group. Overall, administration of lutein in combination with vitamin C improved the status of the total antioxidant defense system in SD rats.

Over the past decade, lutein has been recognized as an important dietary antioxidant for eye health, particularly for preventing age-related macular degeneration [1]. Among various carotenoids, lutein is a major plant oriented xanthophyll component that serves as a dietary antioxidant in the body [23]. Lutein's free radical scavenging antioxidant properties are known to play the principle role in preventing age-related macular disease since oxidative stress in retinal constituents is responsible for the pathogenesis of this disease [4]. Therefore, dietary lutein supplement is known to give rise to effective chain-breaking antioxidant activity due to its ability to quench singlet oxygen and scavenge peroxy radicals [56]. However, there is a still lack of evidence that dietary lutein can directly affect the induction of genes related to the antioxidant defense system in rats, although the major biological mechanism of lutein is linked to antioxidant activity.
Dietary supplementation of lutein is the only way to obtain lutein to prevent age-related cataracts and maculopathy, which are the major causes of blindness, since lutein is not synthesized within the body [7]. However, several studies have shown that the bioavailability and effectiveness of lutein varies greatly according to the complexity of the food matrix, interaction with other nutrients, ssolubility in the gut and dietary sources of lutein [89]. Several studies have reported that the lipid matrix of lutein showed better lutein absorption in the small intestine as a result of enhanced secretion of emulsifying bile acids by the gallbladder [91011]. Therefore, the beneficial effects of lutein are directly associated with the methods in which it is absorbed, deposited and metabolized in the body.
Several studies suggest that supplying mixtures of antioxidants including the carotenoids vitamin C or E may have more powerful antioxidant capacity than providing individual carotenoids [1213]. The mixture of β-carotene with vitamin C and E increased the activity of catalase and superoxide dismutase in humans remarkably [13]. The dietary mixture of carotenoids with vitamin C or folate showed remarkable benefits in cortical and posterior subcapsular cataracts in humans [14]. In contrast, lutein bioavailability was not affected by physiological concentration of vitamin C or E, but was partially hindered by the presence of β-carotene [15]. Therefore, definitive conclusions regarding the effects of dietary mixtures of antioxidants sources on the antioxidant defense system have not been reached, although the combination of several antioxidants appeared to have a synergistic effect on biomarkers of oxidative stress in humans and rats.
The primary goal of this study was to determine whether dietary lutein alone or in combination with vitamin C would influence the mRNA expression and activity of antioxidant enzymes, antioxidant capacity and lipid peroxidation in SD rats.

Materials and Methods

Experimental animals and procedures

The animal handling procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC, No. 2014-2) at the Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology in Korea. A total of thirty male Sprague Dawley (SD) rats purchased from Samtako Korea (Osan, Korea) were kept in a semi-barrier system with a regulated temperature (23±2℃) and light/dark cycle (light on 07:00-19:00). Immediately after a one week acclimation period, 18 rats with similar body weight were randomly allotted into three groups on the basis of body weight. All designated rats were housed in polycarbonate cages (two rats per cage) according to the experimental design. A commercial pelleted diet containing 23% crude protein, 5% crude fat, 5% crude fiber, and 45% nitrogen-free extract and sterilized bottle water were then provided ab libitum.
Each group was provided the pelleted diet and orally administered saline (CON), a commercial lutein dissolved into safflower oils at 50 mg lutein/kg diet (LUT), or a commercial lutein dissolved into safflower oils and vitamin C dissolved into water (50 mg lutein/kg BW and 0.5% vitamin C dissolved into H2O, LVC) for 4 weeks. Lutein and vitamin C were obtained from FloraGLO® (Lutein 20% SAF, DSM Nutritional Products Inc., Basel, Switzerland and Yuhan Pharmacy Co. (Products of DSM, UK)), respectively. A commercial lutein 20% supplement was supplied in an oil form on a 79% safflower oil carrier that contained 1% dl-α-tocopherol. A single dose of lutein was administrated orally daily using an oral zonde needle, while vitamin C was provided in a bottle of water containing 0.5% vitamin C (DSM, UK). The average daily intake of vitamin C was about 1,000 mg/kg BW per rat in the LVC group based on the water intake during the experimental period (data not shown).

Tissue harvesting

All rats were deprived of diets for 12 hours after the last day of the 4 week experimental period before administrating lutein. And then the rats (n=6 per group) were sacrificed with CO2 gas at 6 hours after gavage. Immediately after taking blood from the heart, the liver was harvested. The plasma and liver tissues were then rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -70℃ until further assay.

Plasma biochemical analyses

Plasma glucose, triglyceride, albumin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotranferease (ALT) were measured using a clinical biochemical analyzer (H1 System, Technicon, USA). All analyses were conducted in duplicate.

Expression of mRNA of antioxidant enzymes by Real Time-PCR

To analyze the mRNA expression of antioxidant enzymes including superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), glutathione S-transferase (GST) and catalase (CAT), mRNA was quantified by real-time PCR. The cDNA primers used to amplify each gene in this study are shown in Table 1. Total RNA from hepatic tissue was extracted using RNAzolTM B (TRIzol Reagent, Invitron, Eugene, OR, USA). Briefly, 2 mL of RNAzol solution was added to 100 mg of hepatic tissues from each individual. The tissues were then homogenized using liquid nitrogen and transferred to an Eppendorftube. Next, 100 µL of chloroform was added and incubated for 5 min on ice. The aqueous phase was then separated by centrifugation for 15 min at 15,000×g, after which the isolated RNA was precipitated with the same volume of isopropanol and then centrifuged for 15 min at 15,000×g. The separated total RNA was subsequently washed with 75% ethyl alcohol, dried, and diluted with diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated H2O, after which the optical density at 260 nm was used to quantify the RNA (GeneQuant pro spectrophotometer, Amersham, Piscataway, NJ. USA). Next, 5 µg of total RNA were incubated with 1.0 µg of oligo dT (Invitrogen Co., Carlsbad, CA, USA) at 70℃ for 5 min and 4℃ for 5 min to synthesize the first strand cDNA. The reaction solution was incubated at 42℃ for 50 min, 90℃ for 10 min and 42℃ for 50 min in a reaction mixture containing 5× first strand buffer, 2.5 mM dNTP, 0.1M DTT, superscript III and RT-mixture. Quantification of the target genes and internal control (GADPH) was conducted by real-time quantitative PCR with SYBR green supermix (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) under the following conditions: 5 min at 95℃, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95℃ for 15 s and annealing at 60℃ for 30 sec and then extension at 72℃ for 30 sec. The PCR amplification cycle at which dye fluorescence passed the selected baseline (Ct) was determined by realtime monitoring. The expression of all mRNAs was normalized by the 2[ΔΔ] method [16] to calculate relative changes in gene expression.

Assays of antioxidant enzyme activity, lipid peroxidation and total antioxidant capacity

To harvest the fraction of cytosol and microsomes, homogenized hepatic tissues were centrifuged at 10,000×g, after which the resulting supernatant was centrifuged at 105,000×g in a Centrikon T-2080 ultracentrifuge. The pellet (microsomes) was suspended in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) to maintain a protein concentration of 20 mg/mL, after which the supernatant (cytosol) and a suspended pellet (microsomes) were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -70℃ until further assay. The activity of SOD was analyzed in the cytosol using commercially available assay SOD assay kits (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) based on an indirect assay method of xanthine oxidase as previously described [17]. The SOD activity was expressed as units/mg of proteins, where 1 unit of activity was the amount of enzyme required to inhibit 50% of the SOD or SOD like materials. GPX was measured at 37℃ in the cytosol with cumene hydroperoxide as a substrate [18]. The GPX coupled the reduction of cumene hydroperoxide to the oxidation of NADPH by glutathione reductase, and the concomitant oxidation rate was measured with a spectrophotometer based on the decrease in absorbance at 340 nm. One unit of GPX was expressed as the amount of GPX required to oxidize 1 µmol of NADPH per minute. GST was determined with 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB) as a substrate by measuring the increase in absorbance at 340 nm [19]. One unit of activity was expressed as the amount of GST catalyzing the conjugated CDNB per minute. The lipid peroxidation level in the microsomes was determined by the concentration of thiobarbituric acid (TBA) reacting substances with a wavelength of 532 nm using a UV spectrophotometer [20]. TBA substances are described in nm of malondialdehyde (MDA) per mg of protein. Total antioxidant capacity in plasma and the cytosolic fraction of the liver was analyzed using a commercially available assay kit in conjunction with an ELISA reader (Oxford Biomedical Research, Inc. MI, USA). All assay procedures conducted exactly according to the manufacturer's protocols. Trolox was used to generate a standard curve and data were expressed as mM Trolox equivalents or in µM copper reducing equivalents. Protein concentration was assessed by the BCA method (Pierce Assay) using ELISA (VMax, Molecular Devices, CA, USA).

Statistical analysis

The effects of treatment on all data were analyzed by Proc GLM (SAS Institute Inc.). When the treatment effect was significant at P<0.05, Tukey's test was applied to assess significant differences among dietary groups. All values are presented as the mean±standard deviation (SD) and a P value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Body and relative liver weights and blood biochemical parameters

Effects of the administration of saline (CON), lutein (LUT) or lutein in combination with vitamin C (LVC) on the body and the relative liver weights and blood biochemical parameters of SD rats are shown in Table 2 and 3, respectively. After 28 days of treatment, no significant difference in body and relative liver weights was observed among treatment groups (Table 2). In addition, the levels of blood parameters including glucose, triglyceride, albumin, AST and ALT in the LUT and LVC groups were very similar to those of the CON group (Table 3).

mRNA expression and activity of antioxidant enzymes in the liver

The mRNA expression level and activity of hepatic SOD, GST, GPX and CAT in the CON, LUT and LVC groups is presented in Table 4 and Figure 1, respectively. The LVC group showed a significantly (P<0.05) greater mRNA expression of SOD than the CON group. However, mRNA expression of GPX, GST and CAT was not affected by the administration of lutein or lutein plus vitamin C in the liver of SD rats (Table 4). Similar to the pattern of mRNA expression, the activity of hepatic SOD in the LUC and LVC groups was significantly (P<0.05) higher than that of the CON group, whereas the GPX and CAT activities were not influenced by the administration of lutein or lutein in combination with vitamin C (Figure 1). The activity of GST was significantly (P<0.05) higher in rats administrated lutein (LUT) or lutein in combination with vitamin C (LVC) than in control rats (CON).

Total antioxidant power and lipid peroxidation in the blood and liver

To determine whether a dietary source of antioxidant affects the antioxidant defense system in the plasma and liver of rats, we examined the level of total antioxidant power (TAP) and lipid peroxidation (Figures 2, 3). The total antioxidant power in the plasma and liver significantly (P<0.05) increased in groups administrated lutein in combination with vitamin C relative to the control group (Figure 2). However, lipid peroxidation as indicated by MDA level in liver tissues of rats was unaffected by the administration of lutein or lutein in combination with vitamin C (Figure 3). Although lipid peroxidation of plasma and liver tissues did not differ significantly among groups, the LVC group showed a significantly higher level of total antioxidant capacity compared with the CON group, indicating that the administration of lutein in combination with vitamin C could effectively protect against reactive oxygen radicals in rats.

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the body and liver weights and blood biochemical profiles of SD rats after administration of lutein or lutein in combination with vitamin C. The results showed that treatment with lutein or lutein with vitamin C did not induce changes in glucose, triglyceride, albumin, AST and ALT levels in SD rats. Measurements of AST and ALT have been reported as indirect methods to assess liver damage [21]. Similar to the present study, a study reported that plasma AST and ALT did not differ between the control and lutein groups, although lutein has been shown to decrease oxidative stress and inflammation in the liver and eyes of guinea pigs fed a hypercholesterolemic diet [22].
To evaluate the effects of lutein alone or in combination with vitamin C on the antioxidant defense system in rats, we examined the mRNA expression and activity of antioxidant enzymes, lipid peroxidation and total antioxidant capacity. Rats that received lutein in combination with vitamin C showed the highest level of antioxidant activity, including increased mRNA expression and activity of SOD and total antioxidant capacity in plasma and liver tissues. Therefore, it is thought that increased SOD and total antioxidant capacity in response to supplying lutein in combination with vitamin C might act as powerful antioxidant scavengers against oxidative stress in the tissues of rats. These findings also suggest that vitamin C has a synergistic effect on the antioxidant defense system in rats administered lutein. The administration of lutein alone at the level of 50 mg/kg BW was not sufficient to increase total antioxidant capacity in the plasma and liver, although rats that received lutein alone showed increased induction of some antioxidant enzymes.
Carotenoids such as lutein, a family of fat-soluble pigments, are known to be effective chain-breaking antioxidants due to their ability to scavenge reactive oxygen radicals [6]. However, there is still a lack of evidence that dietary lutein can modulate endogenous antioxidant enzymes in rats, although numerous studies have reported that lutein showed beneficial effects on antioxidant capacity against reactive oxygen species (ROS) in vitro [2324].
In partial agreement with the results of the present study, mice orally administered lutein (50, 100 and 200 mg lutein/kg of BW) showed significantly increased activities of SOD, GST and GPX in the liver [25]. The oral administration of lutein (0.2 and 0.5 mg lutein/kg of BW) in mice significantly enhanced the mRNA expression of SOD and GPX in the liver without affecting lipid peroxidation [26], suggesting that lutein might induce the expression of antioxidant genes. In contrast, several studies indicated that dietary lutein did not directly affect the induction of antioxidant enzymes, including SOD and GPX, in humans and rats [2728]. In addition, dietary supplementation of lutein to rats (20 mg/kg, BW) had no effect on the expression and activity of serum SOD, GPX and CAT compared to control rats, whereas lutein supplementation reversed the noticeably-decreased antioxidant enzyme activity of rats exposed to severe oxidative stress [29]. Interestingly, dietary lutein attenuates hepatic oxidative damage via activation of antioxidant enzymes under severe oxidative stress conditions [1129], suggesting that dietary lutein has antioxidant ability under severe oxidative stress. In agreement with this observation, administration of lutein to rats activated antioxidant enzymes including SOD, GPX or CAT when cellular damage was induced by oxidants [30]. A study also demonstrated that antioxidant enzymes such as SOD and GPX were enhanced in lutein-fed rats when compared with control rats when hepatic damage was induced by alcohol and CCL4 [31]. Moreover, supplementation of the diets of rats with lutein under severe oxidative stress significantly improved the antioxidant defense system by directly scavenging ROS and indirectly activating antioxidant enzymes [26].
Antioxidant vitamins including Vitamin C or E are well known to exert antioxidant capacity against ROS induced by oxidative stress in humans and rodents [3233]. Vitamin C as an electron donor is a well-known redox catalyst that can reduce and thereby neutralize ROS such as hydrogen peroxide [14]. Vitamin E is a very important lipid-soluble antioxidant that is also effective at chain-breaking, enabling protection of membranes from oxidation by reacting with lipid radicals generated during lipid peroxidation [3334]. Recently, evidence has emerged showing that these vitamins interacted with carotenoids to modulate antioxidant status. The mixture of lutein with vitamin C or E showed a significantly positive synergistic effect on the biomarkers of oxidative stress in rats [1214]. In this study, the mRNA expression and activity of SOD in the liver was more significantly enhanced when rats were given lutein in combination with vitamin C, indicating that the mixture of lutein with vitamin C has a potentiating effect relative to single carotenoids. In accordance with our study, the antioxidant effects were more potent when lutein was supplied with vitamin C rather than with vitamin E in Zucker rats [14]. The combined effects of lutein with vitamin C on biomarkers of oxidative stress were also shown to be more potent than those of lutein administered with vitamin E [14]. Dietary supplementation of both β-carotene and vitamin C significantly enhanced the activity of catalase and SOD in humans [13]. A recent study demonstrated that there was a significant association between plasma lutein and vitamin C levels and longer telomere length in humans, suggesting that lutein and vitamin C play a significant role in protecting the integrity of the telomere from oxidative stress [35]. Since dietary total antioxidant capacity is directly related to plasma antioxidant status in humans [36], evidence from our previous studies indicates that lutein interacts with antioxidant vitamins such as vitamin C to maintain the antioxidant defense system in rats.
One possible reason for the synergistic effects of lutein administered in combination with vitamin C is that lutein absorption may be activated by the presence of vitamin C. Interestingly, ddietary vitamin C supplementation significantly facilitated dietary lutein absorption in humans [37]. However, few studies have investigated whether dietary supplementation with vitamin C could have potentiated the absorption of lutein, even though the combination of lutein and vitamin C appears to have potentiating effects on biomarkers of oxidative stress in humans and rats.
Overall, the dietary supplementation of lutein in combination with vitamin C showed more consistent effects and greater significance in the antioxidant defense system than that of lutein alone, although lutein only has been reported to have potential antioxidant capacity. Therefore, our results indicate that lutein in combination with vitamin C may have more beneficial effects on oxidative stability through modulation of the expression of antioxidant enzymes and total antioxidant capacity than lutein alone. However, more sophisticated studies are still needed to elucidate the antioxidant mechanism that enables lutein in combination with vitamin C to cope with oxidative stress conditions.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology Grant 2014. The authors also thank to the technical support of the Regional Animal Research Center (RAIC) at GNTECH.

Notes

Conflict of interests: The authors declare that there is no financial conflict of interests to publish these results.

References

1. Berendschot TT, Goldbohm RA, Klöpping WA, van de Kraats J, van Norel J, van Norren D. Influence of lutein supplementation on macular pigment, assessed with two objective techniques. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000; 41(11):3322–3326. PMID: 11006220.
2. Ahmed SS, Lott MN, Marcus DM. The macular xanthophylls. Surv Ophthalmol. 2005; 50(2):183–193.
crossref
3. Alves-Rodrigues A, Shao A. The science behind lutein. Toxicol Lett. 2004; 150(1):57–83. PMID: 15068825.
crossref
4. Bone RA, Landrum JT, Cains A. Optical density spectra of the macular pigment in vivo and in vitro. Vision Res. 1992; 32(1):105–110. PMID: 1502795.
5. Lim BP, Nagao A, Terao J, Tanaka K, Suzuki T, Takama K. Antioxidant activity of xanthophylls on peroxyl radical-mediated phospholipid peroxidation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992; 1126(2):178–184. PMID: 1627620.
6. Wang M, Tsao R, Zhang S, Dong Z, Yang R, Gong J, Pei Y. Antioxidant activity, mutagenicity/anti-mutagenicity, and clastogenicity/anti-clastogenicity of lutein from marigold flowers. Food Chem Toxicol. 2006; 44(9):1522–1529. PMID: 16757077.
crossref
7. Bartlett HE, Eperjesi F. Effect of lutein and antioxidant dietary supplementation on contrast sensitivity in age-related macular disease: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007; 61(9):1121–1127. PMID: 17268417.
crossref
8. Leeson S, Caston L. Enrichment of eggs with lutein. Poult Sci. 2004; 83(10):1709–1712. PMID: 15510557.
crossref
9. Mamatha BS, Baskaran V. Effect of micellar lipids, dietary fiber and β-carotene on lutein bioavailability in aged rats with lutein deficiency. Nutrition. 2011; 27(9):960–966. PMID: 21295945.
crossref
10. Lakshminarayana R, Raju M, Keshava Prakash MN, Baskaran V. Phospholipid, oleic acid micelles and dietary olive oil influence the lutein absorption and activity of antioxidant enzymes in rats. Lipids. 2009; 44(9):799–806. PMID: 19685091.
crossref
11. Shanmugasundaram R, Selvaraj RK. Lutein supplementation alters inflammatory cytokine production and antioxidant status in F-line turkeys. Poult Sci. 2011; 90(5):971–976. PMID: 21489941.
crossref
12. Blakely S, Herbert A, Collins M, Jenkins M, Mitchell G, Grundel E, O'Neill KR, Khachik F. Lutein interacts with ascorbic acid more frequently than with alpha-tocopherol to alter biomarkers of oxidative stress in female zucker obese rats. J Nutr. 2003; 133(9):2838–2844. PMID: 12949374.
13. Tauler P, Aguiló A, Fuentespina E, Tur JA, Pons A. Diet supplementation with vitamin E, vitamin C and beta-carotene cocktail enhances basal neutrophil antioxidant enzymes in athletes. Pflugers Arch. 2002; 443(5-6):791–797. PMID: 11889577.
14. Taylor A, Jacques PF, Chylack LT Jr, Hankinson SE, Khu PM, Rogers G, Friend J, Tung W, Wolfe JK, Padhye N, Willett WC. Long-term intake of vitamins and carotenoids and odds of early age-related cortical and posterior subcapsular lens opacities. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002; 75(3):540–549. PMID: 11864861.
crossref
15. Reboul E, Thap S, Tourniaire F, Andre M, Juhel C, Morange S, Amiot MJ, Lairon D, Borel P. Differential effect of dietary antioxidant classes (carotenoids, polyphenols, vitamins C and E) on lutein absorption. Br J Nutr. 2007; 97(3):440–446. PMID: 17313704.
crossref
16. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001; 25(4):402–408. PMID: 11846609.
17. Fridovich I. Superoxide dismutase. Enzymology. 1974; 41:36–40.
crossref
18. Tappel AL. Glutathione peroxidase and hydroperoxides. Methods Enzymol. 1978; 52:506–513. PMID: 672654.
19. Habig WH, Pabst MJ, Jakoby WB. Glutathione S-transferases. The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J Biol Chem. 1974; 249(22):7130–7139. PMID: 4436300.
20. Bidlack WR, Tappel AL. Damage to microsomal membrane by lipid peroxidation. Lipids. 1973; 8(4):177–182. PMID: 4348615.
crossref
21. Giannini E, Botta F, Fasoli A, Ceppa P, Risso D, Lantieri PB, Celle G, Testa R. Progressive liver functional impairment is associated with an increase in AST/ALT ratio. Dig Dis Sci. 1999; 44(6):1249–1253. PMID: 10389705.
22. Kim JE, Clark RM, Park Y, Lee J, Fernandez ML. Lutein decreases oxidative stress and inflammation in liver and eyes of guinea pigs fed a hypercholesterolemic diet. Nutr Res Pract. 2012; 6(2):113–119. PMID: 22586499.
crossref
23. Bhattacharyya S, Datta S, Mallick B, Dhar P, Ghosh S. Lutein content and in vitro antioxidant activity of different cultivars of Indian marigold flower (Tagetes patula L.) extracts. J Agric Food Chem. 2010; 58(14):8259–8264. PMID: 20568770.
crossref
24. Hayes JE, Stepanyan V, Allen P, O'Grady MN, O'Brien NM, Kerry JP. The effect of lutein, sesamol, ellagic acid and olive leaf extract on lipid oxidation and oxymyoglobin oxidation in bovine and porcine muscle model systems. Meat Sci. 2009; 83(2):201–208. PMID: 20416759.
crossref
25. Sindhu ER, Preethi KC, Kuttan R. Antioxidant activity of carotenoid lutein in vitro and in vivo. Indian J Exp Biol. 2010; 48(8):843–848. PMID: 21341544.
26. Serpeloni JM, Colus IM, de Oliveira FS, Aissa AF, Mercadante AZ, Bianchi ML, Antunes LM. Diet carotenoid lutein modulates the expression of genes related to oxygen transporters and decreases DNA damage and oxidative stress in mice. Food Chem Toxicol. 2014; 70:205–213. PMID: 24865317.
crossref
27. Jewell C, O'Brien NM. Effect of dietary supplementation with carotenoids on xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes in the liver, lung, kidney and small intestine of the rat. Br J Nutr. 1999; 81(3):235–242. PMID: 10434850.
crossref
28. Hininger IA, Meyer-Wenger A, Moser U, Wright A, Southon S, Thurnham D, Chopra M, Van Den Berg H, Olmedilla B, Favier AE, Roussel AM. No significant effects of lutein, lycopene or beta-carotene supplementation on biological markers of oxidative stress and LDL oxidizability in healthy adult subjects. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001; 20(3):232–238. PMID: 11444419.
29. Wang S, Wang M, Zhang S, Zhao L. Oxidative stress in rats with hyperhomo-cysteinemia and intervention effect of lutein. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014; 18(3):359–364. PMID: 24563435.
30. Arnal E, Miranda M, Barcia J, Bosch-Morell F, Romero FJ. Lutein and docosahexaenoic acid prevent cortex lipid peroxidation in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat cerebral cortex. Neuroscience. 2010; 166(1):271–278. PMID: 20036322.
crossref
31. Sindhu ER, Firdous AP, Preethi KC, Kuttan R. Carotenoid lutein protects rats from paracetamol-, carbon tetrachloride- and ethanol-induced hepatic damage. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2010; 62(8):1054–1060. PMID: 20663040.
crossref
32. Yun SH, Moon YS, Sohn SH, Jang IS. Effects of cyclic heat stress or vitamin C supplementation during cyclic heat stress on HSP70, inflammatory cytokines, and the antioxidant defense system in Sprague Dawley rats. Exp Anim. 2012; 61(5):543–553. PMID: 23095818.
crossref
33. Mustacich DJ, Bruno RS, Traber MG. Vitamin E. Vitam Horm. 2007; 76:1–21. PMID: 17628169.
crossref
34. Traber MG, Atkinson J. Vitamin E, antioxidant and nothing more. Free Radic Biol Med. 2007; 43(1):4–15. PMID: 17561088.
crossref
35. Sen A, Marsche G, Freudenberger P, Schallert M, Toeglhofer AM, Nagl C, Schmidt R, Launer LJ, Schmidt H. Association between higher plasma lutein, zeaxanthin, and vitamin C concentrations and longer telomere length: results of the Austrian Stroke Prevention Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014; 62(2):222–229. PMID: 24428184.
crossref
36. Wang Y, Yang M, Lee SG, Davis CG, Koo SI, Chun OK. Dietary total antioxidant capacity is associated with diet and plasma antioxidant status in healthy young adults. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012; 112(10):1626–1635. PMID: 23017573.
crossref
37. Tanumihardjo SA, Li J, Dosti MP. Lutein absorption is facilitated with cosupplementation of ascorbic acid in young adults. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005; 105(1):114–118. PMID: 15635356.
crossref
Figure 1

Specific activity of antioxidant enzymes (A: SOD, B: GPX and C: GST and D: CAT) in the liver of SD rats administrated saline (CON), lutein (LUT) and lutein in combination with vitamin C (LVC). Means (Mean±SD, n=5) with different superscript differ among dietary groups (P<0.05).

lar-31-117-g001
Figure 2

The level of total antioxidant power in plasma (A) and cytosolic fraction of the liver (B) of SD rats administrated saline (CON), lutein (LUT) and lutein in combination with vitamin C (LVC). Means (Mean±SD, n=5) with different superscript differ among dietary groups (P<0.05).

lar-31-117-g002
Figure 3

The level of MDA in microsome fraction of the liver of SD rats administrated saline (CON), lutein (LUT) and lutein in combination with vitamin C (LVC). Bar represented Mean±SD (n=5).

lar-31-117-g003
Table 1

Primers used for quantification of mRNA using Real Time-PCR

lar-31-117-i001
Antioxidant enzymes Primer sequences Product size (bp) Gene bank Accession No.
SOD 5'-ACT TCG AGC AGA AGG CAA GC-3' 194 NM017050.1
5'-GTC TCC AAC ATG CCT CTC TTC AT-3'
GPX 5'-CAG TTC GGA CAT CAG GAG AA -3' 139 NM030826.3
5'-AGA GCG GGT GAG CCT TCT-3'
GST 5'-CAA GTC CAC TTG TGT GAG TG-3' 230 L29427.1
5'-CAG CTG GAC TAC CTG AGT TC-3'
CAT 5'-ATT GCC GTC CGA TTC TCC-3' 105 NM012520.2
5'-CCA GTT ACC ATC TTC AGT GTA G-3'
GADPH 5'-ATG GAG AAG GCT GGG GCT CAC CT-3' 199 NM017008.4
5'-AGC CCT TCC ACG ATG CCA AAG TTG-3'
Table 2

Changes in body weight and relative live weight of SD rats administrated saline (CON), lutein (LUT) and lutein in combination with vitamin C (LVC)

lar-31-117-i002
Item Treatments*
CON LUT LVC
Initial BW (g), 8 wks 249.63±4.98 251.75±9.48 251.50±4.63
Final BW (g), 12 wks g 323.90±9.38 324.78±10.89 331.67±9.70
Liver weight (g), g/100 g BW 2.81±0.85 2.88±0.59 2.91±0.49

*CON (saline), LUT (50mg lutein/kg BW) and LVC (50mg lutein and 1,000 mg vitamin C/kg, BW).

Table 3

Changes in blood biochemical profiles of SD rats administrated saline (CON), lutein (LUT) and lutein in combination with vitamin C (LVC)

lar-31-117-i003
Item Treatments*
CON LUT LVC
Glucose (mg/dL) 136.20±25.25 133.80±26.76 129.80±34.64
Triglyceride (mg/dL) 62.80±23.41 61.20±19.84 59.60±10.64
Albumin (mg/dL) 2.72±0.31 2.54±0.23 2.76±0.22
AST(U/L) 129.00±0.31 126.80±34.33 117.20±40.15
ALT(U/L) 38.40±13.24 34.40±10.31 33.40±9.84

*CON (saline), LUT (50mg lutein/kg BW) and LVC (50 mg lutein and 1,000 mg vitamin C/kg, BW).

Table 4

Changes in mRNA expression of antioxidant enzymes in the liver of SD rats administrated saline (CON), lutein (LUT) and lutein in combination with vitamin C (LVC)

lar-31-117-i004
Treatments*
CON LUT LVC
ΔCt 2-ΔΔCt ΔCt 2-ΔΔCt ΔCt 2-ΔΔCt
SOD 4.41±0.58b 1 2.95±0.49a 2.74 3.14±0.79a 2.41
GPX 4.51±0.42 1 3.80±0.87 1.63 4.00±0.36 1.42
CAT 4.96±0.82 1 4.44±0.90 1.44 4.11±0.62 1.80
GST 4.99±0.56 1 4.41±0.55 1.80 4.60±0.46 1.31

*CON (saline), LUT (50 mg lutein/kg BW) and LVC (50 mg lutein and 1,000 mg vitamin C/kg, BW).

The values are ΔCt, which is represneted as the Ct of each target gene corrected by Ct of the control gene (GADPH).

The fold difference in the relative expression of the target gene was calculated as the 2-ΔΔCt.

Means (Mean±SD, n=5) with different superscript differ among dietary groups (P<0.05).

TOOLS
Similar articles