Journal List > Lab Anim Res > v.26(4) > 1053644

Lee, Jung, Lee, Park, and Han: Laboratory Rodents Negatively Affected by Construction Environment

Abstract

This report describes rodents in a laboratory animal facility that was adversely affected by a noisy environment during construction work. There was much noise and vibration as well as dust caused by the drilling and hammering. The noise levels, frequencies, and length of time when occurring in the drilling and hammering, were all measured. The drilling showed noise levels ranging from 50–90 decibels (dB) (A-filter, A), and the hammering presented 60–70 dB (A). Some researchers raised problems regarding animal experiments, including skin injuries resulted from self-mutilation, and increase of mortality. This gives useful information to people who plan to renovate laboratory animal facilities as it is a very rare case.

References

Carlton, D.L. and Richards, W. (. 2002. ). Affordable noise control in a laboratory animal facility. Lab. Anim. 31,. 47–48.
Milligan, S.R., Sales, G.D. and Khirnykh, K. (. 1993. ). Sound levels in rooms housing laboratory animals: an uncontrolled daily variable. Physiol. Behar. 53,. 1067–1076.
Sales, G.D., Wilson, K.J., Spencer, K.E. and Milligan, S.R. (. 1988. ). Environmental ultrasound in laboratories and animal houses: a possible cause for concern in the welfare and use of laboratory animals. Lab. Anim. 22,. 369–375.

Figure 1.
Diagram of remodeling schedule and noise exposure periods.
lar-26-425f1.tif
Figure 2.
Various skin injuries caused by self-biting in nude mice (BALB/c nude, CAnN.Cg-Foxn1nu/CrlCrlj, ORIENT BIO INC). They were five weeks old when admitted to the animal facility in the middle of June. Three weeks later injuries were found on the skin of the mice. They were used as the negative control group in a study and were separately housing in each cage operating by individually ventilated cage system.
lar-26-425f2.tif
Table 1.
The number of times for different noise levels and the exposure time at a noise caused by construction tools during the renovation
Tools Noise levels (dB) Time exposed (sec)#
50–60 60–70 70–80 80–90
Drilling 141 775 955 25 5–10
Hammering 530 1

Data show the number of times along with noise levels occurred by drilling and hammering.

# Exposure time at a drilling or hammering noise.

Table 2.
The problems of animal experiments raised by researchers
Species Strain Age (wks) Construction∗ Signs Remarks
Before During
Mouse nude 8 4 / 10 Self-mutilations Increased mortality Housed in each cages separately Chronic lung injury model
Rat SD 12 2 / 5 6 / 10

Data show values as affected/total animals.

Table 3.
The health monitoring results conducted before the construction
Organism SPF barrier Semi-barrier
1 2 3 4 1 2 3
Virology Lymphocytic choriomeningitis (LCM) virus NT NT 0/2 0/2 NT NT 0/1
Ectromelia virus (Mouse pox) NT NT 0/2 0/2 NT NT 0/1
Sendai virus 0/2 0/2 0/2 0/2 0/1 0/1 0/2
Mouse Hepatitis virus (MHV) NT NT 0/2 0/2 NT NT 0/1
Sialodacryoadenitis (SDA) virus 0/2 0/2 NT NT 0/1 0/1 0/1
Hanta virus 0/2 0/2 NT NT 0/1 0/1 0/1
Bacteriology Mycoplasma spp. 0/2 0/2 0/2 0/2 0/1 0/1 0/2
Clostridium piliforme (Tyzzer's disease) 0/2 0/2 0/2 0/2 0/1 0/1 0/2
Corynebacterium kutscheri 0/2 0/2 0/2 0/2 0/1 0/1 0/2
Pasteurella pneumotropica 0/2 0/2 0/2 0/2 0/1 0/1 0/2
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 0/2 0/2 NT NT 0/1 0/1 0/1
Salmonella spp. 0/2 0/2 0/2 0/2 0/1 0/1 0/2
Citrobacter rodentium (E. coli O115a, c:K(B)) NT NT 0/2 0/2 NT NT 0/1
Bordetella bronchiseptica 0/2 0/2 NT NT 0/1 0/1 0/1
Streptococcus pneumoniae 0/2 0/2 NT NT 0/1 0/1 0/1
Parasitology Intestinal protozoa 0/2 0/2 0/2 0/2 0/1 0/1 0/2
Ectoparasite 0/2 0/2 0/2 0/2 0/1 0/1 0/2
Syphacia spp. 0/2 0/2 0/2 0/2 0/1 0/1 0/2

Data are reported as positive/total tests performed. NT: Not test.

Table 4.
The Health monitoring results conducted during the construction
Organism SPF barrier Semi-barrier
1 2 3 1
Virology Lymphocytic choriomeningitis (LCM) virus NT NT 0/1 0/1
Ectromelia virus (Mouse pox) NT NT 0/1 0/1
Sendai virus 0/1 0/1 0/1 0/1
Mouse Hepatitis virus (MHV) NT NT 0/1 0/1
Sialodacryoadenitis (SDA) virus 0/1 0/1 NT NT
Hanta virus 0/1 0/1 NT NT
Mycoplasma spp. 0/1 0/1 0/1 0/1
Clostridium piliforme (Tyzzer's disease) 0/1 0/1 0/1 0/1
Corynebacterium kutscheri 0/1 0/1 0/1 0/1
Pasteurella pneumotropica 0/1 0/1 0/1 0/1
Bacteriology Pseudomonas aeruginosa NT 0/1 NT NT
Salmonella spp. 0/1 0/1 0/1 0/1
Citrobacter rodentium (E. coli O115a, c:K(B)) NT NT 0/1 0/1
Bordetella bronchiseptica 0/1 0/1 NT NT
Streptococcus pneumoniae 0/1 0/1 NT NT
Intestinal protozoa 0/1 0/1 0/1 0/1
Parasitology Ectoparasite 0/1 0/1 0/1 0/1
Syphacia spp. 0/1 0/1 0/1 0/1

Data are reported as positive/total tests performed. NT: Not test. The numbers of total tests in Table 4 were reduced comparing with those in Table 3 because the capacity of breeding animals was decreased for efficient animal transportation to the newly remoldeled animal facility.

TOOLS
Similar articles