Journal List > J Korean Bone Joint Tumor Soc > v.17(2) > 1051994

Cho, Choi, Kwon, Chung, and Kim: How to Overcome Complications of Allograft Transplantation?

Abstract

Purpose

We evaluated the complications of allograft reconstruction after a bone tumor resection, and reviewed literatures to overcome such complications.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed clinical records and radiographs of fifteen patients in whom reconstruction with allograft after bone tumor resection.

Results

Eight patients were men and seven were women with a mean age of 27.1 years (1–56 years) and a mean follow-up period of 89.5 months (33–165 months). All postoperative complications related to the allograft were recorded. Twenty patients (80.0%) obtained a radiologic bony union at a mean of 8.35 months (4–12 months). The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 73.5% (46.6–93.0%). Nine patients (60.0%) experienced one event and 3 (20.0%) patients experienced multiple events during the follow-up period. Recorded events were infection (3), fracture (2), nonunion (2), limb length discrepancy (2) and varus deformity (2). The mean event free survival period was 60.8 months (6–144 months). The mean allograft survival period was 80.2 months and the 5 year survival rate of the allografts was 83.0%.

Conclusion

In order to overcome complications, the combination of an allograft and vascularized fibular graft is highly recommended. In the near future, the tissue engineering technique, the application of the stem cell and PRP, could reduce the complication of allograft such as resorption and nonunion.

References

1. Donati D, Colangeli M, Colangeli S, Di Bella C, Mercuri M. Allograft-prosthetic composite in the proximal tibia after bone tumor resection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466:459–65.
crossref
2. Mankin HJ, Gebhardt MC, Jennings LC, Springfield DS, Tomford WW. Long-term results of allograft replacement in the management of bone tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996. 86–97.
crossref
3. Hornicek FJ Jr, Mnaymneh W, Lackman RD, Exner GU, Malinin TI. Limb salvage with osteoarticular allografts after resection of proximal tibia bone tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998; 352:179–86.
crossref
4. Ogilvie CM, Crawford EA, Hosalkar HS, King JJ, Lackman RD. Long-term results for limb salvage with osteoarticular allograft reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467:2685–90.
crossref
5. Prarrish F. Allograft replacement of all or part of the end of a long bone following excision of a tumor. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973; 55:1–22.
6. Ottolenghi CE. Massive osteo and osteoarticular bone grafts. Technique and results of 62 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972; 87:156–64.
7. Muscolo DL, Ayerza MA, Aponte-Tinao LA. Long-term results of allograft replacement after total calcanectomy. A report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82:109–12.
8. Getty PJ, Peabody TD. Complications and functional outcomes of reconstruction with an osteoarticular allograft after intraarticular resection of the proximal aspect of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81:1138–46.
crossref
9. Dick HM, Malinin TI, Mnaymneh WA. Massive allograft implantation following radical resection of high-grade tumors requiring adjuvant chemotherapy treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985. 88–95.
crossref
10. Ward WG, Heise E, Boles C, et al. Human leukocyte antigen sensitization after structural cortical allograft implantations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005. 31–5.
crossref
11. Giannini S, Vannini F, Lisignoli G, Facchini A. Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of an allogenic bone graft engineered with autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells in the treatment of a large segmental defect of the ulna. A case report. Chir Organi Mov. 2008; 91:171–5.
crossref
12. Myerson MS, Neufeld SK, Uribe J. Fresh-frozen structural allografts in the foot and ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87:113–20.
crossref
13. Eward WC, Kontogeorgakos V, Levin LS, Brigman BE. Free vascularized fibular graft reconstruction of large skeletal defects after tumor resection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468:590–8.
crossref
14. Heitmann C, Erdmann D, Levin LS. Treatment of segmental defects of the humerus with an osteoseptocutaneous fibular transplant. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84A:2216–23.
crossref
15. Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA. Current concepts review. The surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980; 62:1027–30.
crossref
16. Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993; 286:241–6.
crossref
17. Brigman BE, Hornicek FJ, Gebhardt MC, Mankin HJ. Allografts about the knee in young patients with high-grade sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 421:232–9.
crossref
18. Fox EJ, Hau MA, Gebhardt MC, Hornicek FJ, Tomford WW, Mankin HJ. Long-term followup of proximal femoral allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; 397:106–13.
crossref
19. Muscolo DL, Ayerza MA, Aponte-Tinao LA. Survivorship and radiographic analysis of knee osteoarticular allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000; 373:73–9.
crossref
20. Ortiz-Cruz E, Gebhardt MC, Jennings LC, Springfield DS, Mankin HJ. The results of transplantation of intercalary allografts after resection of tumors. A longterm follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997; 79:97–106.
crossref
21. Capanna R, Bufalini C, Campanacci M. A new technique for reconstruction of large metadiaphyseal bone defects. A combined graft(allograft shell plus vascularized fibula). Orthop Traumatol. 1993; 2:159–77.
22. Innocenti M, Abed YY, Beltrami G, Delcroix L, Manfrini M, Capanna R. Biological reconstruction after resection of bone tumors of the proximal tibia using allograft shell and intramedullary free vascularized fibular graft: longterm results. Microsurgery. 2009; 29:361–72.
crossref
23. Bae D, Waters P, Gebhardt M. Results of free vascularized fibula grafting for allograft nonunion after limb salvage surgery for malignant bone tumors. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006; 26:809–14.
crossref
24. Sorger JI, Hornicek F, Zavatta M, et al. Allograft fractures revisited. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; 382:66–74.
crossref
25. Enneking WF, Campanacci DA. Retrieved human allografts: a clinicopathological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83A:971–86.
26. Lord CF, Gebhardt MC, Tomford WW, Mankin HJ. Infection in bone allografts: incidence, nature, and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988; 70:369–76.
crossref
27. Mnaymneh W, Malinin TI, Makley JT, Dick HM. Massive osteoarticular allografts in the reconstruction of extremities following resection of tumors not requiring chemotherapy and radiation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985; 197:76–87.
crossref
28. Berrey BH Jr, Lord CF, Gebhardt MC, Mankin HJ. Fractures of allografts. Frequency, treatment, and end-results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990; 72:825–33.
crossref
29. Vander Griend RA. The effect of internal fixation on the healing of large allografts. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994; 76:657–63.
crossref
30. Hornicek FJ, Gebhardt MC, Tomford WW, et al. Factors affecting nonunion of the allograft-host junction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; 382:87–98.
crossref
31. Ceruso M, Taddei F, Bigazzi P, Manfrini M. Vascularised fibula graft inlaid in a massive bone allograft: considerations on the biomechanical behaviour of the combined graft in segmental bone reconstructions after sarcoma resection. Injury. 2008; 39(Suppl 3):S68–74.
crossref
32. Friedrich JB, Moran SL, Bishop AT, Wood CM, Shin AY. Free vascularized fibular graft salvage of complications of long-bone allograft after tumor reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90:93–100.
crossref
33. Chang DW, Weber KL. Use of a vascularized fibula bone flap and intercalary allograft for diaphyseal reconstruction after resection of primary extremity bone sarcomas. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 116:1918–25.
crossref
34. Chang DW, Weber KL. Segmental femur reconstruction using an intercalary allograft with an intramedullary vascularized fibula bone flap. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2004; 20:195–9.
35. Moran SL, Shin AY, Bishop AT. The use of massive bone allograft with intramedullary free fibular flap for limb salvage in a paediatric and adolescent population. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 118:413–9.
36. Lucarelli E, Fini M, Beccheroni A, et al. Stromal stem cells and platelet-rich plasma improve bone allograft integraftion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 435:62–8.

Figure 1.
This graph shows the allograft-related complications that occurred in patients (NU, nonunion; LLD, limb length discrepancy).
jkbjts-17-65f1.tif
Figure 2.
The Kaplan-Meier survival curve represents event free survival for all patients.
jkbjts-17-65f2.tif
Figure 3.
The Kaplan-Meier survival curve represents allograft survival for all patients.
jkbjts-17-65f3.tif
Table 1.
Patients’ Characteristics
No Age Sex Location Diagnosis Type of reconstruction Union (months) Functional score (%) Oncologic result Follow-up (months) Event number Event-free survival (months) Allograft survival (months)
1 12 M PT Osa Arthrodesis 12 60 NED 127 2 69 74
2 24 M Pelvis Chondrosa Arthrodesis 4 50 CDF 113 1 101 113
3 1 M PT Osa Intercalary 8 76 CDF 165 1 21 165
4 6 F DF Osa Intercalary 9 76 CDF 58 1 37 58
5 37 F ST Osa Intercalary   83 CDF 76 1 6 76
6 56 F PF MBT APC 9 60 CDF 166 1 98 98
7 13 M PH Osa Osteoarticular   46.6 CDF 47 2 9 29
8 44 M PT Chondrosa Intercalary 12 77 CDF 40 2 21 40
9 14 F DF Osa APC 5 83 CDF 128 0 128 128
10 11 F PT Osa Intercalary 11 93 CDF 110 0 110 110
11 31 F PH Osa Osteoarticular 12 90 CDF 144 0 144 144
12 53 F Patella Osa Osteoarticular   83 CDF 33 0 33 33
13 22 M DF GCT Intercalary 4 83 CDF 46 0 46 46
14 46 M DF GCT APC 9 83 CDF 38 0 38 38
15 37 M Pelvis Chondrosa APC 5 60 CDF 52 0 52 52
Average 27.1         8.3 73.6   89.5 0.8 60.8 80.2

PT, proximal tibia; Osa, osteosarcoma; NED, no evidence of disease; Chondrosa, chondrosarcoma; CDF, continuous disease free; DF, distal femur; ST, shaft tibia; PF, proximal femur; MBT, metastatic bone tumor; APC, allograft-prosthesis composite; PH, proximal humerus; GCT, giant cell tumor.

Table 2.
Events, Overcome of Events, Fibular Use and Cause of Allograft Removal
No Events Overcome of events Fibular use Cause of allograft removal
1 Fracture at 69 months Plating & bone graft None Local recurrence
  Limb leg discrepancy at 81 months Internal bone transport    
2 Infection at 101 months Surgical debridement None Intact
3 Varus deformity at 21 months Ipsilateral fibular transposition Used Intact
4 Limb leg discrepancy at 37 months Lengthening of allograft & VFBG Used Intact
5 Nonunion at 6 months Plating & bone graft None Intact
6 Infection at 98 months Allograft removal None Infection
7 Nonunion at 9 months Iliac bone graft Used Infection
  Infection at 29 months Allograft removal & VFBG    
8 Varus deformity at 21 months Corrective osteotomy & bone graft None Intact
  Fracture at 36 months Long leg cast    
9 None Not applicable None Intact
10 None Not applicable Used Intact
11 None Not applicable None Intact
12 None Not applicable None Intact
13 None Not applicable None Intact
14 None Not applicable None Intact
15 None Not applicable None Intact

VFBG, vascularized fibular bone graft.

TOOLS
Similar articles