Journal List > J Korean Bone Joint Tumor Soc > v.16(1) > 1051967

Chung, Kang, Bahk, Rhee, Lee, Park, and Kim: Prognostic Factors in Liposarcomas: A Retrospective Study of 52 Patients

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate prognostic factors influencing on local recurrence, distant metastasis and event-free survival of liposarcomas.

Materials and Methods

Fifty-two patients managed for liposarcomas since 1993 were analyzed respectively in the view of prognostic influence of patient age, tumor size, location, histologic type, histologic grade, resection type, surgical margin, chemotherapy and radiation therapy on local recurrence, distant metastasis and event-free survival. The mean follow up period was 39 months. The univariate and multivariate regression analysis were performed for statistical evaluation.

Results

The local recurrences occurred in 11 patients (21.2%) and distant metastasis in 4 patients (8%), Event-free survival rate at 4 year follow up was 67%. In univariate analysis, histologic grade, surgical margin, chemotherapy and radiation therapy were significant prognostic factors on local recurrence (p<0.05). However, histologic grade lost its significance in muitivariate analysis. Trunk location revealed higher rate of distant metastasis than extremity location. In univariate analysis on event-free survival. histologic grade and chemotherapy were significant factors (p<0.05). No factor remained significant in multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Considering selection bias, positive surgical margin was negative prognostic factor on local recurrence. Liposarcomas arisen in trunk revealed higher rate of distant metastasis. There was no independent prognostic factor on event-free survival of patients with liposarcomas.

REFERENCES

1. Koea JB, Leung D, Lewis JJ, et al. Histopathologic type: an independent prognostic factor In primary soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity? Ann Surg Oncol. 2003; 10:342–440.
crossref
2. Lewis JJ, Leung D, Casper ES, et al. Multifactorial analysis of longterm followup (more than 5 years) of primary extremity sarcoma. Arch Surg. 1999; 134:190–4.
crossref
3. Dalal KM, Kattan MW, Antonescu CR, Brennan MF, Singer S. Subtype specific prognostic nanogram for patients with primary liposarcoma of the retroperitoneum, extremity, or trunk. Ann Surg. 2006; 244:381–91.
4. Eilber FC, Eilber FR, Eckardt J, et al. The impact of chemo-theraphy on the survival of patients with high-grade primary extremity liposarcoma. Ann Surg. 2004; 240:686–95.
5. Fiore M, Grosso F, Lo Vullo S, et al. Myxoid/round cell and pleomor phic liposarcomas. Cancer. 2007; 109:2522–31.
6. Heuvel SE, Hoekstra HJ, van Ginkel RJ, Bastiaannet E, Suur-meijer A. Clinicopathologic prognostic factors in myxoid liposarcoma: a retrospective study of 49 patients with longterm followup. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007; 14:222–9.
7. Zagars GK, Goswitz MS, Pollack A. Liposarcoma: outcome and prognostic factors following conservation surgery and radiation therapy. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys. 1996; 36:311–9.
crossref
8. Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Mannual. 5th ed.Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven;1997. p. 140–6.
9. Evans HL. Liposarcoma. a study of 55 cases with a reassessment of its classification. Am J Surg Pathol. 1979; 3:507–23.
crossref
10. Liu CU, Yen CC, Chen WM, et al. Soft tissue sarcoma of extremities: the prognostic significance of adequate surgical margin in primary operation and reoperation after recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol; [published online 2010 March 9].
11. Singer S, Antonescu CR, Riedel E, Brennan MF. Histologic subtype and margin of resection predict pattern of recurrence and survival for retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Ann Surg. 2003; 238:358–71.
crossref
12. Stojadinovic A, Leung D, Hoos A, Jaques D, Lewis J, Brennan M. Analysis of the prognostic significance of microscopic margins in 2084 localized primary adult soft tissue sarcomas. Ann of Surg. 2002; 235:424–34.
crossref
13. Trojani M, Contesso G, Coindre JM, et al. Soft tissue sarcoma of adults: study of pathological prognostic variables and definition of a histopathologic grading system. Int J Cancer. 1984; 33:37–42.
14. Antonescu CR, Tschernyavsky SJ, Decuseara R, et al. Prognostic impact of P53 status. TLS-CHOP fusion transcript structure, and histological grade in myxoid liposarcoma: a molecular and clinicopathologic study of 82 cases. Clin Cancer Res. 2001; 7:3977–87.
15. Gebhard S, Coindre JM, Michels JJ, et al. Pleomorphic liposarcoma: clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and followup analysis of 63 cases: a study from the French Federation of cancer centers sarcoma group. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002; 26:601–16.
16. Henricks WH, Chu YC, Goldblum Jr, et al. Dedifferentiated liposarcoma: a clinocopathological analysis of 155 cases with a proposal for an expanded definition of dedifferentiation. Am J Surg Pathol. 1997; 21:271–81.
17. Linehan DC, Leung J, Leung D, et al. Influence of biologic factors and anatomic site in completely resected liposarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 2000; 18:1637–43.
crossref
18. McComick D, Mentzel T, Beham A, et al. Dedifferentiated liposarcoma: clinocopathologic analysis of 32 cases suggesting a better prognostic subgroup among pleomorphic sarcomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 1994; 18:1213–23.
19. Spillane AJ, Fisher C, Thomas JM. Myxoid liposarcoma-the frequency and the natural history of nonpulmonary soft tissue metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999; 6:389–94.
20. Kim HS, Lee JY, Yi SY, et al. Liposarcoma: exploration of clinical prognostic factors for risk based stratification of therapy. BMC Cancer. 2009; 9:205.
crossref
21. Antonescu CR, Ladanyi M. Myxoid liposarcoma. Fletcher CDM, Unni KK, Mertens F, editors. World Health Organization classification of tumors: pathology and genetics of tumors of soft tissue and bone. IARC Press. France: Lyon;2002. p. 40–3.
22. Kilpatrick SE, Doyon J, Choong PF, Sim FH, Nascimento AG. The clinicopathologic spectrum of myxoid and round cell liposarcoma. A study of 95 cases. Cancer. 1996; 77:1450–8.
crossref

Figure 1.
The cummulative event free survival rates were 67% at 4 year and 55% at 10 year followup.
jkbjts-16-14f1.tif
Table 1.
Patient Characteristics and Summary of Statistical Analysis
Factors No of case (%) No of event
Local recurrence
Distant metastasis
Event-free survival
LR DM EFS Uni.V Mult.V Uni.V Mult.V Uni.V Mult.V
Age at diagnosis                    
 60 yr> 31 (60) 6 3 22 0.706   0.523   0.920  
 60 yr< 21 (40) 5 1 15            
Size (maximum diameter)                    
 10 cm> 28 (54) 4 2 22 0.473   0.875   0.319  
 10 cm< 24 (46) 7 2 15            
Location                    
 Trunk 15 (29) 5 3 7 0.178   0.034   0.067  
 Extremity 37 (71) 6 1 30            
Histologic type                    
 Well diff. 10 (19) 1 0 9 0.630   0.919   0.057  
 Myxoid 23 (44) 6 2 15            
 Round cell 9 (17) 0 2 7            
 Pleomorphic 6 (12) 2 0 4            
 Dediff. 4 (8) 2 0 2            
Histologic grade                    
 Grade 1 28 (54) 3 2 23 0.037 0.092 0.803 0.009   0.078
 Grade 2 14 (27) 4 1 9            
 Grade 3 10 (19) 4 1 5            
Resection type                    
 Wide resec. 45 (87) 10 3 32 0.640   0.491   0.717  
 Marginal resec. 7 (13) 1 1 5            
Margin status                    
 Negative 39 (75) 5 3 31 0.010 0.017 1.000   0.134  
 Positive 13 (25) 6 1 6            
Chemotherapy                    
 Performed 14 (27) 6 1 7 0.010 0.037 1.000 0.022   0.220
 Not performed 38 (73) 5 3 30            
Radiation Tx                    
 Performed 15 (29) 7 1 7 0.007 0.018 0.800   0.104  
 Not performed 37 (71) 4 3 30            

LR, local recurrence; DM, distant metastasis; EFS, event-free survival; Uni.V, univatiate; Mult.V, multivariate; Well diff., well differentiated; Dediff., dedifferentiated.

Table 2.
Summary of Cases with Local Recurrence
Pt's no Age/sex Size (cm) Location Type Grade Resection Margin ChemoTx RTx. F/U (Mo) Outcome
1 21/M 8 Thigh Myxoid 2 Marginal Positice No Yes 46 NED
2 49/F 12 Thigh Dediff. 3 Wide Positive Yes Yes 82 NED
3 59/M 3 Thigh Myxoid 1 Wide Negative Yes Yes 57 NED
4 65/M 9 Thigh Myxoid 2 Wide Positive Yes No 53 NED
5 63/M 4 Thigh Pleomorphic 3 Wide Negative Yes Yes 29 AWD
6 74/M 17 Thigh Myxoid 2 Wide Positive Yes Yes 12 DOD
7 49/F 11 Retroperi. Myxoid 1 Wide Negative No No 52 NED
8 65/F 17 Pelvis Myxoid 1 Wide Positive No No 16 AWD
9 62/M 4 Neck Dediff. 3 Wide Negative No Yes 20 AWD
10 48/F 8 Back Well diff. 1 Wide Positive No Yes 53 NED
11 39/M 4 Back Pleomorphic 3 Wide Negative Yes No 46 AWD

ChemoTx, chemotherapy; RTx., radiation therapy; F/U (Mo), follow up (months); Dediff., dedifferentiated; Retroperi., retroperitonium; Well diff., well differentiated; NED, no evidence of disease; AWD, alive with disease; DOD, Died of disease.

After local recurrence.

Table 3.
Summary of Cases with Distant Metastasis
Pt's no Age/sex Size (cm) Location Type Grade Resection Margin ChemoTx RTx. F/U (Mo) Outcome
1 29/F 12 Thigh Myxoid 2 Wide Negative Yes Yes 20 NED
2 68/M 27 Retroperi. Myxoid 1 Marginal Negative No No 58 DOD
3 31/M 3 Pelvis Round cell 3 Wide Negative Yes No 14 DOD
4 33/M 4 Buttock Myxoid 2 Wide Positive No No 20 AWD

ChemoTx, chemotherapy; RTx., radiation therapy; F/U (Mo), follow up (months); Retroperi., retroperitoneum; NED, no evidence of disease; DOD, died of disease; AWD, alive with disease.

After local recurrence.

TOOLS
Similar articles