Journal List > J Korean Acad Nurs Adm > v.23(4) > 1051925

TOOLS
Ryu, Yun, and Kim: Trends in Evidence-based Nursing Research in South Korea
Original Article

Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration 2017; 23(4): 385-396.

Published online: 30 September 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2017.23.4.385

Trends in Evidence-based Nursing Research in South Korea

Seang Ryu1, Sun Weon Yun1, Yun Sook Kim2

1Department of Nursing, Mokpo National University, Korea.

2Mokpo Christian Hospital, Korea.

Corresponding author: Yun, Sun Weon. Department of Nursing, Mokpo National University, 1666 Yeongsan-ro, Cheonggye-myeon, Muan 58554, Korea. Tel: +82-61-450-2677, Fax: +82-61-450-2679, sunoen02@naver.com

Received 2 June 2017       Revised 26 July 2017       Accepted 25 August 2017

Copyright © 2017 Korean Academy of Nursing Administration

Korean Academy of Nursing Administration

(open-access):

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to analyze the current status of research related to evidence-based nursing and to suggest directions for the future of evidence-based nursing practice, education and research.

Methods

A search was done of 20 research publications, including domestic nursing journals, nursing master's theses and doctoral dissertations before November 2016. Finally, 183 studies were selected. The selected papers were analyzed using descriptive statistics and χ2 test with the SPSS/WIN 18.0 program.

Results

Most of papers examined in this study were journal articles (80.9%). Meta-analysis (35.0%) was the most common study design. Methodological characteristics were as follows: before 2010 about 5% were documents that suggested Priori' design, generation of PICO, search strategy, quality assessment and description of quality assessment outcome, but after 2011, these designs increased to 30.8%, 73.1%, 41.0%, 91.0% and 65.4%, respectively. The most frequent topics for evidence-based nursing implementation were evidence-based nursing readiness (16 papers). Highest frequency topics in systematic reviews and meta-analysis were studies that confirmed the intervention effect of exercise programs. The highest frequency topics in guideline were temperature control.

Conclusion

Researchers' perceptions to improve research methodological quality and education to strengthen the research capability are necessary.

Keywords: Evidence-based nursing, Nursing research, Trends

Figures and Tables

Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

jkana-23-385-g001
Table 1

General Characteristics of Evidence-based Nursing Research (N=183)

jkana-23-385-i001

*Only the top three were shown; IRB=Institutional review board; SR=Systematic review; RCT=Randomized controlled trial.

Table 2

Methodological Characteristics of Evidence-based Nursing Research (N=114)

jkana-23-385-i002

PICO=Patient/problem, intervention, comparison, outcome; COSI=Core+standard+ideal.

Table 3

Topics related to Evidence-based Nursing Implementation

jkana-23-385-i003

*The number in parentheses indicates the number of each domain; EBN=Evidence-based nursing.

Table 4

Topics by Evidence Type for Evidence-Based Nursing Practice

jkana-23-385-i004

*Duplicate count, †The number in parentheses indicates the number of each domain; EVD=External ventricular drainage, ADHD=Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

References

1. Oh EG, Kim SA, Kim SS, Kim S, Cho EY, Yoo JS, et al. Integrating evidence-based practice into RN-to-BSN clinical nursing education. J Nurs Educ. 2010; 49(7):387–392. DOI: 10.3928/01484834-20100331-02.
2. Gu MO, Cho MS, Cho YA, Jeong JS, Jeong IS, Park JS, et al. Topics for evidence-based clinical nursing practice guidelines in Korea. J Korean Clin Nurs Res. 2011; 17(3):307–318.
3. Fineout-Overholt E, Melnyk BM, Schultz A. Transforming health care from the inside out: Advancing evidence-based practice in the 21st century. J Prof Nurs. 2005; 21(6):335–344. DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.10.005.
4. Cho YA. Practical application and spread of evidence based nursing. Evid Nurs. 2013; 1(1):1–3.
5. Gu MO, Cho MS, Cho YA, Jeong JS, Eun Y, Jeong IS, et al. A prioritizing for the evidence-based nursing practice guidelines development. J Korean Clin Nurs Res. 2012; 18(1):39–51.
6. Jang KS, Kim NY, Kim YM, Ryu SA, Park SJ, Baek M, et al. Evidence based nursing: Access to education, research and practice. Gwangju: Chonnam National University;2005.
7. Choe MA, Bang KS, Park YH, Kang HJ. Current status and direction for future development of evidence-based nursing in Korea. Perspect Nurs Sci. 2011; 8(2):129–138.
8. Song Y, Gang MH, Kim SA, Shin IS. Review of meta-analysis research on exercise in South Korea. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2014; 44(5):459–470. DOI: 10.4040/jkan.2014.44.5.459.
9. Son HJ. Assessing methodological quality of Korean systematic review using AMSTAR[master's thesis]. Seoul: Korea University;2012.
10. Kim JH, Kim AK. A quality assessment of meta-analyses of nursing in South Korea. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2013; 43(6):736–745. DOI: 10.4040/jkan.2013.43.6.736.
11. Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E, Gallagher-Ford L. The establishment of evidence-based practice competencies for practicing registered nurses and advanced practice nurses in realworld clinical settings: Proficiencies to improve healthcare quality, reliability, patient outcomes, and costs. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2014; 11(1):5–15. DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12021.
12. Shin HS, Hyun MS, Ku MO, Cho MO, Kim SY, Jeong JS, et al. Analysis of research papers published in the Journal of the Korean Academy of Nursing-focused on research trends, intervention studies, and level of evidence in the research. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2010; 40(1):139–149. DOI: 10.4040/jkan.2010.40.1.139.
13. Choi EH, Jang EH, Choi JY, Lee SJ, Seo HK, Park KS. Comparison of domestic and international research (1992-2011): Intensive care nursing studies. Korean J Adult Nurs. 2015; 27(4):384–396.
14. Kim SY, Park JE, Seo HJ, Seo HS, Son HJ, Shin CM, et al. NECA's guidance for undertaking systematic reviews and meta-analyses for intervention. seoul: National Evidence-based healthcare Collaborating Agency;2011.
15. Park SH. A comparative study of the regulatory law and regulation on the role of institutional review board in human subjects research in Korea and the USA. Bioeth Policy Stud. 2013; 7(1):1–30.
16. Hopia H, Latvala E, Liimatainen L. Reviewing the methodology of an integrative review. Scand J Caring Sci. 2016; 30(4):662–669. DOI: 10.1111/scs.12327.
17. Jang KS, Choi JY, Ryu SA, Kim YH, Park HY, Kim EA, et al. Implementation skill for evidence based practice. Seoul: Hyunmoonsa;2014. p. 1–273.
18. Kim YH, Jang KS, Chung KH, Choi JY, Ryu SA, Park H. An example of systematic searching for guidelines to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections-Part I:Using the PubMed database. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2014; 20(1):128–143. DOI: 10.11111/jkana.2014.20.1.128.
19. Son YJ, Kim SH, Park YS, Lee SK, Lee YM. The influence of information retrieval skill on evidence based practice competency in clinical nurses. Korean J Adult Nurs. 2012; 24(6):635–646. DOI: 10.7475/kjan.2012.24.6.635.
20. De Vito C, Manzoli L, Marzuillo C, Anastasi D, Boccia A, Villari P. A systematic review evaluating the potential for bias and the methodological quality of meta-analyses in vaccinology. Vaccine. 2007; 25(52):8794–8806. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.10.034.
21. Long L, Briscoe S, Cooper C, Hyde C, Crathorne L. What is the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of conservative interventions for tendinopathy? An overview of systematic reviews of clinical effectiveness and systematic review of economic evaluations. Health Technol Assess. 2015; 19(8):1–134. DOI: 10.3310/hta19080.
22. Kim YS, Kim J, Park MM. Factors influencing competency in evidence-based practice among clinical nurses. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2015; 21(2):143–153. DOI: 10.11111/jkana.2015.21.2.143.
23. Cho YA, Gu MO, Jeong JS, Eun Y, Kim SM, Jung IS, et al. Current status of evidence-based nursing in general hospitals in Korea. Korean Soc Evid Based Nurs. 2013; 1(1):16–24.
24. Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E, Gallagher-Ford L, Kaplan L. The state of evidence-based practice in US nurses: Critical implications for nurse leaders and educators. J Nurs Adm. 2012; 42(9):410–417. DOI: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3182664e0a.
25. Flodgren G, Rojas-Reyes MX, Cole N, Foxcroft DR. Effectiveness of organisational infrastructures to promote evidence-based nursing practice. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 15(2):CD002212. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002212.pub2.
26. Williamson KM, Fineout-Overholt E, Kent B, Hutchinson AM. Teaching EBP: Integrating technology into academic curricula to facilitate evidence-based decision-making. World views on Evidence-Based Nursing. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2011; 8(4):247–251. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2010.00192.x.
27. Park M. Implementation of evidence based nursing education into nursing management clinical practicum: Outcome evaluation and diffusion strategies. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2013; 19(1):39–47. DOI: 10.11111/jkana.2013.19.1.39.
28. Saunders H, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Stevens KR. Effectiveness of an education intervention to strengthen nurses' readiness for evidence-based practice: A single-blind randomized controlled study. Appl Nurs Res. 2016; 31:175–185. DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2016.03.004.
29. Baldi I, Dal Lago E, De Bardi S, Sartor G, Soriani N, Zanotti R, et al. Trends in RCT nursing research over 20 years: Mind the gap. Br J Nurs. 2014; 23(16):895–899. DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2014.23.16.895.
30. Mantzoukas S. A review of evidence-based practice, nursing research and reflection: levelling the hierarchy. J Clin Nurs. 2008; 17(2):214–223. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01912.x.
TOOLS
Similar articles