Journal List > J Korean Acad Nurs Adm > v.23(1) > 1051904

TOOLS
Kim, Kim, Jung, Kim, and You: A Literature Review of Team Effectiveness on Hospital Nursing Units
Original Article

Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration 2017; 23(1): 18-31.

Published online: 31 January 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2017.23.1.18

A Literature Review of Team Effectiveness on Hospital Nursing Units

Se Young Kim1, Jong Kyung Kim2, Myun Sook Jung3, Eun Kyung Kim4, Sun Ju You5

1Department of Nursing, Changwon National University, Korea.

2College of Nursing, Dankook University, Korea.

3College of Nursing, Gyungsang University, Korea.

4Department of Nursing, Chungbuk National University, Korea.

5Department of Nursing, Mokpo National University, Korea.

Corresponding author: Kim, Jong Kyung. College of Nursing, Dankook University, 119 Dandae-ro, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan 31116, Korea. Tel: +82-41-550-3893, Fax: +82-41-559-7902, jongkimk@dankook.ac.kr

Received 3 November 2016       Revised 16 January 2017       Accepted 24 January 2017

Copyright © 2017 Korean Academy of Nursing Administration

(open-access):

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to analyze literature related to nursing team effectiveness and to summarize the definition variables included, measurement tools, and findings. Basic data on operation and research for team effectiveness in nursing units was sought.

Methods

A literature search was performed to identify all studies published between 2003 and 2016 from periodicals indexed in PUBMED, CINAHL, SCIENCE DIRECT, RISS, KISS, and NAL databases. The following keywords were used in the search: ‘team effectiveness’, ‘nurse’, ‘nursing’, and ‘hospital’. Ten studies were analyzed.

Results

The analysis included domestic and international literature on nursing team effectiveness. The foreign literature included studies of various organizations including nurses, use of various research tools, leadership programs and/or new nursing delivery systems. In the Korean studies, most of the research on team effectiveness surveyed nurses on team satisfaction, team commitment, and team performance in general nursing units, operating rooms, and intensive care units.

Conclusion

The findings show the necessity to develop a definition of team effectiveness that can be accepted comprehensively in nursing organizations in Korea. The definition should reflect team effectiveness that includes all cooperating units not only nurses of the nursing unit but also all other related health care teams.

Keywords: Nursing team, Work performance, Nurse, Hospital, Review literature as topic

Figures and Tables

Figure 1

The process of selection of researches related to nursing team effectiveness.

jkana-23-18-g001
Table 1

Criteria of Team Outcomes

jkana-23-18-i001
Table 2

The List of Researches of selected Nursing Team Effectiveness

jkana-23-18-i002
Table 3

Analysis of Researches of selected Nursing Team Effectiveness

jkana-23-18-i003

N=umber of tool items; PS=Peer satisfaction; TS=Team satisfaction; TC=Team commitment; RTP=Recognition of teamperformance.

References

1. Cohen SG, Bailey DR. What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. J Manage. 1997; 23(3):239–290. DOI: 10.1177/014920639702300303.
2. Kozlowski SWJ, Bell BS. Work groups and teams in organizations. In : Borman WC, Ilgen DR, Klimoski RJ, editors. Handbook of psychology: industrial and organizational psychology. London: Wiley;2003. p. 333–375.
3. Jung MS, Park KO, Kim SY, Kim EK, Kim EY, Kim JK. Nursing management. 2nd ed. Seoul: Hyunmoonsa;2016. p. 1–704.
4. Lemieux-Charles L, McGuire WL. What do we know about health care team effectiveness? A review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev. 2006; 63(3):263–300. DOI: 10.1177/1077558706287003.
5. Heinemann GD, Zeiss AM, editors. Team performance in health care: Assessment and development. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media;2002. p. 1–404.
6. Buljac-Samardzic M, Dekker-van Doorn CM, van Wijngaarden JD, van Wijk KP. Interventions to improve team effectiveness: A systematic review. Health Policy. 2010; 94(3):183–195. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.09.015.
7. Hackman R. The design of work teams. In : Lorsch J, editor. Handbook of Organizational Behavior. New Jergy: Prentice-Hall;1987. p. 315–342.
8. Lee SM. Relationships of nurses' teamwork skills to team effectiveness in nursing units [master's thesis]. Busan: Catholic University of Pusan;2013.
9. McGrath JE. Social psychology: A brief introduction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston;1964. p. 1–164.
10. Ilgen DR, Hollenbeck JR, Johnson M, Jundt D. Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annu Rev Psychol. 2005; 56:517–543. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250.
11. Mathieu J, Maynard MT, Rapp T, Gilson L. Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. J Manage. 2008; 34(3):410–476. DOI: 10.1177/0149206308316061.
12. Hoegl M, Gemuenden HG. Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: a theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organ Sci. 2001; 12(4):435–449. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.12.4.435.10635.
13. Nieva VF, Fleishman EA, Rieck A. Team dimensions: Their identity, their measurement, and their relationships. Final Technical Report for Contract No. DAHC19-78-C-0001. Washington, DC: Advanced Research Resources Organizations;1978.
14. Bommer WH, Johnson JL, Rich GA, Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB. On the interchangeability of objective and subjective measures of employee performance: A meta-analysis. Pers Psychol. 1995; 48(3):587–605. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01772.x.
15. Beal DJ, Cohen RR, Burke MJ, McLendon CL. Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. J Appl Psychol. 2003; 88(6):989–1004. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989.
16. Kirkman BL, Rosen B, Tesluk PE, Gibson CB. The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating role of face-to-face interaction. Acad Manage J. 2004; 47(2):175–192. DOI: 10.2307/20159571.
17. Jehn KA, Shah PP. Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediation processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997; 72(4):775–790. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.775.
18. Kirkman BL, Rosen B. Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Acad Manage J. 1999; 42(4):58–74. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.775.
19. Kirkman BL, Tesluk PE, Rosen B. The impact of demographic heterogeneity and team leader-team member demographic fit on team empowerment and effectiveness. Group Organ Manag. 2004; 29(3):334–368. DOI: 10.1177/1059601103257412.
20. Mathieu JE, Gilson LL, Ruddy TM. Empowerment and team effectiveness: An empirical test of an integrated model. J Appl Psychol. 2006; 91(1):97–108. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.97.
21. Chen G, Kirkman BL, Kanfer R, Allen D, Rosen B. A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. J Appl Psychol. 2007; 92(2):331–346. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.331.
22. Barrick MR, Stewart GL, Neubert JM, Mount MK. Relating member ability and personality to work team processes and team effectiveness. J Appl Psychol. 1998; 83(3):377–391. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.377.
23. Hiller NJ, Day DV, Vance RJ. Collective enactment of leadership roles and team effectiveness: a field study. Leadersh Q. 2006; 17(4):387–397. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.004.
24. Van der Vegt GS, Bunderson JS. Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Acad Manage J. 2005; 48(3):532–547. DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2005.17407918.
25. Tesluk PE, Mathieu JE. Overcoming roadblocks to effectiveness: Incorporating management of performance barriers into models of work group effectiveness. J Appl Psychol. 1999; 84(2):200–217. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.84.2.200.
26. Barrick MB, Bradley BH, Kristof-Brown AL, Colbert AE. The moderating role of top management team interdependence: Implications for real teams and working groups. Acad Manage J. 2007; 50(3):544–557. DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.25525781.
27. Balkundi P, Harrison DA. Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inference about network structure's effects on team viability and performance. Acad Manage J. 2006; 49(1):49–68. DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2006.20785500.
28. Lester SW, Meglino BM, Korsgaard MA. The antecedents and consequences of group potency: a longitudinal investigation of newly formed work groups. Acad Manage J. 2002; 45(2):352–368. DOI: 10.2307/30693510.
29. Stewart GL, Barrick MR. Team structure and performance: assessing the mediating role of intra team process and the moderating role of task type. Acad Manage J. 2000; 43(2):135–148. DOI: 10.2307/1556372.
30. Schofield RF, Maryann A. Interdisciplinary teams in health care and human services settings: Are they effective? Health Soc Work. 1999; 24(3):210–219. DOI: 10.1093/hsw/24.3.210.
31. Lemieux-Charles L, McGuire WL. What do we know about health care team effectiveness? a review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev. 2006; 63(3):263–300. DOI: 10.1177/1077558706287003.
32. Weisman CS, Gordon DL, Cassard SD, Bergner M, Wong R. The effects of unit self-management on hospital nurses' work process, work satisfaction and retention. Med Care. 1993; 31(5):381–393. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199305000-00001.
33. Cassard SD, Weisman CS, Gordon DL, Wong R. The impact of unit-based self-management by nurses on patient outcomes. Health Serv Res. 1994; 29(4):415–433.
34. Ling CW. Performance of a self-directed work team in a home healthcare agency. J Nurs Adm. 1996; 26(9):36–40. DOI: 10.1097/00005110-199609000-00008.
35. DiMeglio K, Padula C, Piatek C, Korber S, Barrett A, Duncharme M, et al. Group cohesion and nurse satisfaction. Examination of a team-building approach. J Nurs Adm. 2005; 35(3):110–120. DOI: 10.1097/00005110-200503000-00003.
36. Gibson CB. Me and us: differential relationships among goal-setting training, efficacy and effectiveness at the individual and team level. J Organ Behav. 2001; 22(7):789–808. DOI: 10.1002/job.114.
37. Kim SH. Nursing organizational culture, team effectiveness, patient's satisfaction in a team-centered hospital [master's thesis]. Seoul: Ewha Womans University;2004.
38. Hong EH. A study on the relationship between nursing organizational culture and ICU team effectiveness [master's thesis]. Seoul: Ewha Womans University;2003. 1–107.
39. Kim KO. A study on the relationships among nursing organizational characteristics, types of nursing organizational culture and team effectiveness at operating rooms [master's thesis]. Seoul: Hanyang University;2004. 1–104.
40. Cioffi J, Ferguson L. Team nursing in acute care settings: nurses' experiences. Contemp Nurse. 2009; 33(1):2–12. DOI: 10.5172/conu.33.1.2.
41. Wells J, Manuel M, Cunning G. Changing the model of care delivery: Nurses' perceptions of job satisfaction and care effectiveness. J Nurs Manag. 2011; 19(6):777–785. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01292.x.
42. Kilpatrick K. How do nurse practitioners in acute care affect perceptions of team effectiveness? J Clin Nurs. 2013; 22(17-18):2636–2647. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12198.
43. La Sala R, Boninsegni K, Tani A, Rasi A, Sansovini L, Scarpelli G, et al. A cross selectional survey in a critical care: The job satisfaction and functioning team of the health professionals. Acta Biomed. 2015; 86:3 Suppl. 183–188.
44. Wallis A, Kennedy K. Leadership training to improve nurse retention. J Nurs Manag. 2013; 21(4):624–632. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01443.x.
45. Kim JH, Kim J. Path diagram for organizational characteristics and team effectiveness of intensive care unit. J Korean Health Fundam Med Sci. 2009; 2(3):175–182.
46. Hastings C. Differences in professional practice model outcomes: The impact of practice setting. Crit Care Nurs Q. 1995; 18(3):75–85. DOI: 10.1097/00002727-199511000-00011.
47. LaFasto F, Larson C. When teams work best: 6,000 team members and leaders tell what it takes to succeed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage;2001.
48. Mueller CW, McCloskey JC. Nurses' job satisfaction: A proposed measure. Nurs Res. 1990; 39(2):113–117.
49. Mellin EA, Bronstein L, Anderson-Butcher D, Amorose AJ, Ball A, Green J. Measuring interprofessional team collaboration in expanded school mental health: model refinement and scale development. J Interprof Care. 2010; 24(5):514–523. DOI: 10.3109/13561821003624622.
50. Ahn SY. Mediating effect of conflict type on the relationship between heterogeneity perception with coworker in team and team effectiveness [master's thesis]. Seoul: Ewha Womans University;2001. 1–96.
51. Locke EA. The nature and causes of job satisfaction. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 1976. 1:p. 1297–1343.
52. Mowday RT, Steers RM, Porter LW. The measurement of organizational commitment. J Vocat Behav. 1979; 14(2):224–247. DOI: 10.1016/0001-8791(79)90072-1.
53. Shortell SM, Zimmerman JE, Rousseau DM, Gillies RR, Wagner DP, Draper EA, et al. The performance of intensive care units: Does good management make a difference? Med Care. 1994; 32(5):508–525.
54. Yun WJ. Development of scale for individual's teamwork skill and study for validity [master's thesis]. Seoul: Sungkyunkwan University;2007. 1–99.
55. Sundstrom E, De Meuse KP, Futrell D. Work teams: applications and effectiveness. Am Psychol. 1990; 45(2):120. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.45.2.120.
TOOLS
Similar articles