Journal List > J Korean Acad Nurs Adm > v.21(1) > 1051840

TOOLS
Oh, Jang, Gong, and Lee: Development of Agenda Priority for Nursing Service Research and Development
Original Article

Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration 2015; 21(1): 99-110.

Published online: 31 January 2015

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2015.21.1.99

Development of Agenda Priority for Nursing Service Research and Development

Eui Geum Oh1, Yeon Su Jang1, Sae Lom Gong2, Yoon Ju Lee3

1College of Nursing · Nursing Policy Research Institute, Yonsei University, Korea.

2Severance Hospital, Korea.

3College of Nursing, Pusan National University, Korea.

Corresponding author: Lee, Yoon Ju. College of Nursing, Pusan National University, 49 Busandaehak-ro, Mulgeum-eup, Yangsan 626-870, Korea. Tel: +82-51-510-8361, Fax: +82-51-510-8308, lyj@pusan.ac.kr

Received 6 November 2014       Revised 23 December 2014       Accepted 27 December 2014

Copyright © 2015 Korean Academy of Nursing Administration

(open-access):

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to suggest agenda priorities for nursing service R&D (Research and Development) related policies development.

Methods

Two steps in developing the agendas and priorities were performed in this descriptive study. First, nursing service R&D agendas were extracted through needs assessment of nursing researchers and practitioners. Then, the priority of agendas was set by Analytic Hierarchy Process by ten experts who were representatives of nursing and other healthcare professionals.

Results

Six core areas and forty-six nursing service R&D agendas were developed. The priority of agendas was different according to the evaluation criteria depending on weight value of nursing services.

Conclusion

In order to select and promote nursing service R&D projects within national healthcare policy, nursing service R&D policy should be proposed with consideration to the importance of the criteria in reflecting characteristics of nursing care. By strengthening R&D capabilities for quality improvement and sensitive awareness of national directions for healthcare R&D policies, nursing service R&D can be appropriately promoted.

Keywords: Nursing services, Research and development, Priority, Analytic hierarchy process

Figures and Tables

Figure 1

Weights of evaluation criteria for nursing service R&D.

R&D=Research and development.
jkana-21-99-g001
Table 1

General Characteristics of Participants on Needs Assessment for Nursing Service R&D (N=97)

jkana-21-99-i001

*In the case of educator, calculation is done by clinical nursing practice career+career of education; †The degree of how much one knows about nursing service R&D is asked based on the 0~5 point measure, where 0 means 'completely knows nothing' and 5 means 'knows very well about it'; ICU=Intensive care Unit; ER=Emergency room; OR=Operation room; R&D=Research and development.

Table 2

Agendas for Nursing Service R&D

jkana-21-99-i002
Table 3

Priority of Nursing Service R&D Agendas by Different Criteria

jkana-21-99-i003

Notes

This research is part of a research project funded by Ministry of Health & Welfare(A111240).

References

1. Lee YT. Development concept and research theme of healthcare/public service. Seoul: Korea Health Industry Development Institute;2011. 10. No.: 2011-49.
2. Lee WJ. Present and future of health technology R&D. Paper presented at: The 11th health technology forum. 2011 May 13; Grand Hilton Hotel. Seoul.
3. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Healthcare R&D [Internet]. Seoul: The Ministry of Health and Welfare;2013. cited 2013 October 10. Available from: http://www.mw.go.kr/front_new/jc/sjc0105mn.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=06&MENU_ID=060502.
4. Korea Health Industry Development Institute. A 2009 health industry white paper. Seoul: Korea Health Industry Development Institute;2010. 08. No.: 2010-43.
5. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Ministry of health and welfare year book 2010. Seoul: The Ministry of Health and Welfare;2010. 12. No.: 11-1351000-000048-10.
6. Oh EG. Support and implementation plan for the nursing service R&D. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare;2012. 01. No.: A111240.
7. Jang BY, Kim EJ, Hwang SW. Global New Service R&D Strategy. Science and Technology Policy Institute;2011. 12. No.:2011-21.
8. Kim SP, Park JI. Trend of Knowledge Intensive Service R&D. Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning;2010. 12. No.:2010-12.
9. Saaty TL. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res. 1990; 48:9–26.
10. Jin YC, Moon SH. Analysis on priority of healthcare policy of Jeju Special Self-Governing Province: based on the pending issues on introduction of commercial hospital. Korean J Policy Anal Eval. 2010; 20(4):229–255.
11. Park SH, Choi MH. An derivation of the major factors for the healing-environment elements in women's hospital by the analysis of priority - focused on the cognitive comparison between medical related experts and patients. J Architect Inst Korea. 2007; 23(3):73–82.
12. Park MB, Nam EW, Lee HJ, Shin TS. A study of priority setting of healthy city project indicators with the use of AHP model. Korean J Health Educ Promot. 2008; 25(3):139–151.
13. Lee JI, Cho KT, Chae JC. Priority setting for future core technologies in crops research using analytic hierarchy process. Korean J Crop Sci. 2004; 49(6):546–551.
14. Yang CM. A study on new selection process of research proposals using AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process). Daejeon: National Research Foundation of Korea;2007.
15. Jung YH. The criteria and models of prioritisation on health related research programs. Health Welf Policy Forum. 2007; 128:105–113.
16. Song HJ, Kang MS, Cho SJ, Chung SH, Oh JY. Comparative study on priority setting in healthcare of developed countries and implications. Korean J Health Econ Policy. 2008; 14(1):1–27.
17. Cho YG, Cho KT. Formulating R&D strategy for core technologies in biotechnology using the delphi and the AHP. In : Proceedings of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society Conference; 2004 February 21-22; Chonbuk University. Jeonju.
18. Aczel J, Saaty TL. Procedures for synthesising ratio judgements. J Math Psychol. 1983; 27:93–102.
19. Jang KS, Kim BN, Kim YM, Kim JS, Jeong SH. Analysis of research articles published in the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration for 3 Years (2010-2012). J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2013; 19(5):679–688. DOI: 10.11111/jkana.2013.19.5.679.
20. Jang PY, Kim S, Kang HJ. Services R&D strategy for the competitiveness of service industry. Seoul: Science and Technology Policy Institute;2009. 12. Report No.: 2009-20.
21. Choe MA, Bang KS, Kim NC, Kim SJ, Kim YS, Kim H, et al. Nursing research trends analysis using 2011 East Asian Forum of Nursing Scholars (EAFONS) abstract. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ. 2012; 18(2):332–344. DOI: 10.5977/jkasne.2012.18.2.332.
22. Kim KS. Trends and prospects of nursing research in Korea. Paper presented at: 40th anniversary nursing conference of Korean Society of Nursing Science. 2010 October 22; Managing the Science and Technology Center. Seoul.
23. Kim K, Chang SO, Kang HS, Kim KS, Kim JI, Kim H, et al. Trends in research studies published in Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing: 2009-2011. J Korean Acad Fundam Nurs. 2012; 19(3):383–391. DOI: 10.7739/jkafn.2012.19.3.383.
24. Ryu H, Tanaka M, Arita K, Cho JH. A review of community health nursing research in Korea and Japan. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2010; 21(4):532–540. DOI: 10.12799/jkachn.2010.21.4.532.
TOOLS
Similar articles