Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to identify the level of project perception for those nurses from research-driven hospitals and to analyze the effect of research-relevant performance in the health care field focusing on the mediated effect of research capacity and job satisfaction.
Methods
Data were collected from June, 2014 to July, 2014, and participants were 106 research nurses in Research-driven hospitals. Descriptive statistics, Independent t-test, One-way ANOVA, structural equation modeling (SEM).
Results
As a result, Research-relevant performance according to project perception of research nurses from Research-driven Hospitals was not statistically significant, but research capacity and job satisfaction had a mediating role. Evaluation System Perception was significantly different from Research Capacity (p<.001), Research Capacity was significantly different from Job Satisfaction (p<.001), Job Satisfaction was significantly different from Research Performance (p<.001)
References
1. Fostering Research-Driven Hospital Planning. Korea Health Industry Development Institute;2012. November. Report.
2. Research-Driven Hospital Designation Guide. Ministry of Health and Welfare Republic of Korea;2012. December.
3. Health care industry advancement plan for the future welfare society realizes. Korea Health Industry Development Institute, Samsung Economic Research Institute;2010. August. Report.
4. Park JW. Barriers and facilitators to the research activity in nursing practice. Clin Nurs Res. 1997; 3(1):235–252.
5. Jung SH. Key Success Factors of the Research-Driven Hospital business. 2012. No4. Policy Report.
6. Development of evaluation indicators and methods for Research-Driven Hospital designation. Korea Health Industry Development Institute;2012. November. Report.
7. National Research and Development and Analysis Report 2012. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Evaluation and Planning;2013. Annual Report.
8. Choi JY, Kim EK, Kim SY. Effects of Empowerment and job satisfaction on nursing performance of clinical nurses. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2014; 20(4):426–436.
9. Kim GL. A study on the development of a Research-based Hospital model in Korea [dissertation]. Seoul: Yonsei University;2010. 53–100.
10. Researchers survey report of the research-driven hospital. Korea Health Industry Development Institute;2014. August. Report.
11. Hallowell R, Schlesinger LA, Zornitsky J. Internal service quality, customer, and job satisfaction: Linkages and implications for management. Hum Resour Plan. 1996; 19(2):20–31.
12. Health Technology Promotion Act Enforcement Rules. 2014.
13. Kang HS, Kim WO, Jeong IS, Baik JM. The working conditions and clinical trial practice of research nurses. Clin Nurs Res. 2004; 9(2):42–55.
14. Kim TE, Kim GH. Job status and job satisfaction among clinical research coordinator. J Korean Nurs Adm Acad Soc. 2009; 15(3):336–345.
15. Bowen KE, Rice LS. Who is clinical research nurse? Res Nurse. 1998; 4(4):1–4.
16. Ganter J, Bednaz S. CRA and CRC salary survey. Appl Clin Trial. 1998; 7(7):38–50.
17. Yang YH, Gu MO. Research related activities andi its related factors in clinical nurse. J Korean Acad Fundam Nurs. 2005; 12(3):421–429.
18. Shin YC, Park YC. An analysis of the determinants of quality of medical services in hospital. J Soc Sci Res. 2007; 23(2):251–279.
19. Oh EG, Oh HJ, Lee YJ. Nurses research activities and barriers of research utilization. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2004; 34(5):838–848.