Journal List > J Korean Acad Nurs Adm > v.20(4) > 1051761

TOOLS
Park, Park, and Yu: Comparison of Hospital Nurses' Recognition of the Team System and Effects on the Nursing Organizational Team System
Original Article

Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration 2014; 20(4): 414-425.

Published online: 30 September 2014

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2014.20.4.414

Comparison of Hospital Nurses' Recognition of the Team System and Effects on the Nursing Organizational Team System

Kwang-ok Park1, Sung Hee Park2, Mi Yu3

1Department of Nursing, Sunchon National University, Korea.

2Department of Nursing, Kyungmin College, Korea.

3College of Nursing, Gyeongsang National University, Korea.

Correspondence: Yu, Mi. College of Nursing, Gyeongsang National University, 816-15 Jinju-daero, Jinju 660-751, Korea. Tel: +82-55-772-8229, Fax: +82-55-772-8222, yumi825@gnu.ac.kr

Received 9 May 2014       Revised 18 June 2014       Accepted 25 August 2014

Copyright © 2014 Korean Academy of Nursing Administration

(open-access):

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to identify hospital nurses' recognition of the team system and the effectiveness of the team system as an organizational structure.

Methods

A self-report questionnaire was used to collect data from 247 general hospital nurses during 4 months in 2013. Analysis was done using descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson correlation coefficients and factor analysis with SPSS 18.0. program.

Results

There was no significant difference in nurses' recognition of team structure (t=2.06, p=.153) or effect of team structure (t=0.36, p=.549) according to use of team system. In hospitals with a team system, there were positive correlations between recognition of the effect of the team system and age (r=.25, p=.033), and total clinical career (r=.26, p=.012). In hospitals not using a team system, nurses' recognition of team structure as an organizational system (r=.31, p<.001), nurses' recognition of team structure, total (r=.30 p<.001) correlated significantly with the effects of team system.

Conclusion

Results of this study provide a retrospection view of the team system in nursing organizational systems. The nursing team system's ultimate goal needs to be confirmed for complementary nursing care. Also, more studies on nurses' perceptions of, and effectiveness of the team system are necessary.

Keywords: Hospital, Organizational structure, Nursing, Team

Figures and Tables

Table 1
General Characteristics according to Operation of Team System (N=247)
jkana-20-414-i001

Note. Missing values are excluded.

ICU=Intensive care unit, OR=Operating room.

Table 2
Factor Analysis of Nurses' Recognition of Organizational Team System
jkana-20-414-i002
Table 3
Comparison of Nurses' Recognition of Organizational Team System (OTS), Effects of Team System by General Characteristics
jkana-20-414-i003

OTS=Organizational team structure; NR_OTS=Nurses' recognition of operation of team structure; NR_STS=Nurses' recognition of organizational structure of team structure; NR_CTS=Nurses' recognition of culture of team structure; NR_TSt=Nurses' recognition of team structure, total; E_TS=Effects of team structure.

Table 4
Correlations of related Variables with Effects of Team System when use a Team System (N=99)
jkana-20-414-i004

X1=Age; X2=Total clinical experience; X3=Clinical experience in current unit; X4=Nurses' recognition of operations of team system; X5=Nurses' recognition of organizational structure of team system; X6=Nurses' recognition of culture of team system; X7=Nurses' recognition of team system, total; X8=Effects of team system.

Table 5
Correlations of related Variables with Effects of Team System when not using a Team System (N=148)
jkana-20-414-i005

X1=Age; X2=Total clinical experience; X3=Clinical experience in current unit; X4=Nurses' recognition of operations of team system; X5=Nurses' recognition of organizational structure of team system; X6=Nurses' recognition of culture of team system; X7=Nurses' recognition of team system, total; X8=Effects of team system.

Notes

This study was approved by Sunchon National University IRB(cnu1-201305-HR-001-02) & Seoul Asan hospital IRB(AMC 2013-0920).

References

1. Oh SY, Kim BS. A study of the substance of the team system operation and the effectiveness of the team system in Korean government. Korean J Public Adm. 2009; 47(1):133–158.
2. Park WW. Team system in Korea: Characteristics, effectiveness, and future directions. J Korean Bus Adm. 2007; 41:59–97.
3. Park KO. Team Managers' experience with a team system in the hospital. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ. 2012; 18(3):486–498.
4. Choi SY, Nam EW. The influences of a team system's introduction to hospital organization, regarding job satisfaction and organization commitment. Korean J Hosp Manage. 2000; 5(1):232–271.
5. Kim SH. Nursing organizational culture, team effectiveness, patient's satisfaction in a team-centered hospital[master's thesis]. Seoul: Ewha Womans University;2004.
6. Kim TR, An HJ. The influence of organizational effectiveness by team system. J Korean Assoc Public Adm. 2007; 19(1):1–21.
7. Lee EJ. Change in organizational characteristics and job satisfaction by the adoption of the new organizational structure 'team framework' at a university hospital [master's thesis]. Seoul: Seoul National University;2000.
8. Lee KY, Kim DW. The research for the rationality and justification as introduction factors of team system. J Bus Adm Res. 2001; 30:1009–1035.
9. Park SH, Ju HJ, Park KK. A study on incongruence of the team-based system in the bureaucratic context. Study Korean Public Adm. 2007; 16(3):3–29.
10. Shin TH, Won IS. The research for utilization and effectiveness of team system in domestic industry. J Hum Resour Adm Res. 1995; 19:259–1035.
11. Shin CW, Lee DW. The empirical study related to the causes of failure in team system in Korean business. J Korean Bus Adm. 2002; 33:249–269.
12. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 05. 39(2):175–191.
13. Park CH, Lee CH. An exploratory study on the benefits team system. Korean Public Adm Q. 2006; 18(4):1003–1028.
14. Kang HC. A guide on the use of factor analysis in the assessment of construct validity. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2013; 43(5):587–594. http://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.5.587.
15. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate data analysis. 5th ed. New York, NY: Prentice Hall International;1998.
16. Chang CW, Park SA. The relationships between the hospital's organizational pattern for nursing, organizational characteristics perceived by nurses and their job satisfaction. J Nurs Acad Soc. 1993; 23(3):397–416.
17. Yu BS, Yu BN. An empirical study on the strategic factors and processes for patient focus value(Focus on team-based organization). J Train Dev. 2007; 15:457–473.
18. Park KO, Yi MS. Nurses' experience of career ladder program in a general hospital. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2011; 41(5):581–592. http://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2011.41.5.581.
19. Levi D. Group dynamics for teams. London: Sage Publication;2001.
20. Katzenbach JR, Smith DK. The wisdom of teams: Creating high-performance organization. New York, NY: Harper Business Essentials;1994.
21. Kim SY, Kim EK, Lim HM, Lee MY, Park KO, Lee KA. Structural equation modeling on nursing productivity of nurses in Korea. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2013; 43(1):20–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.1.20.
TOOLS
Similar articles