Journal List > J Korean Acad Periodontol > v.39(1) > 1049830

Son, Shin, Yang, and Kye: Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with anorganic bovine bone : Histologic evaluation in humans

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this report is to investigate the efficacy of anorganic bovine bone xenograft(Bio-Oss®) at maxillary sinus floor augmentation.

Materials and methods

Two male patients who missed maxillary posterior teeth were included. They were performed maxillary sinus floor augmentation using anorganic bovine bone xenograft(Bio-Oss®). After 10 or 13 months, the regenerated tissues were harvested using trephine drills with 2 or 4mm diameter and non-decalcified specimens were made. The specimens were examined histologically and histomorphometrically to investigate graft resorption and new bone formation.

Results

Newly formed bone was in contact with Bio-Oss® particles directly without any gap between the bone and the particles. The proportions of newly formed bone were 23.4~25.3% in patient 1(Pt.1) and 28.8% in patient 2(Pt.2). And the proportions of remained Bio-Oss® were 29.7~30.2% in Pt.1 and 29.2% in Pt.2. The fixtures installed at augmented area showed good stability and the augmented bone height was maintained well.

Conclusion

Anorganic bovine bone xenograft(Bio-Oss®) has high osteoconductivity and helps new bone formation, so that it can be used in maxillary sinus floor augmentation.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1
Preoperative panoramic view.
jkape-39-95-g001
Figure 2
Intraoperative view of Right side.
jkape-39-95-g002
Figure 3
Intraoperative view of Left side.
jkape-39-95-g003
Figure 4
Postoperative panoramic view(10months).
jkape-39-95-g004
Figure 5
Histologic view after 10months.
jkape-39-95-g005
Figure 6
Preoperative panoramic view.
jkape-39-95-g006
Figure 7
Intraoperative view.
jkape-39-95-g007
Figure 8
Postoperative panoramic view(13months).
jkape-39-95-g008
Figure 9
Histologic view after 13months.
jkape-39-95-g009
Table 1
Histomorphometric analysis(%)
jkape-39-95-i001

References

1. Bays R. The pathophysiology and anatomy of edentulous bone loss. Reconstructive Preprosthetic Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1986. 1:1–17.
2. Galindo-Moreno P, Avila G, Fernandez-Barbero JE, et al. Evaluation of sinus floor elevation using a composite bone graft mixture. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2007. 18:376–382.
crossref
3. Zinner ID, Small SA. Maxillary sinus grafts and prosthetic management. Implant Dentistry:From Failure to Success. 2004. 1st edition. Hong kong: Quintessence Books;99–100.
4. Kamada M, Shimazu K, Aoki H, et al. Maxillary sinusitis caused by oral implants. Practica Oto-Rhino-Laryngologic. 2003. 96:231–236.
crossref
5. Galindo-Moreno P, Sanchez-Fernandez E, Avila G, et al. Migration of implants into the maxillary sinus: two clinical cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005. 20:291–295.
6. Van den Bergh JPA, Ten Bruggenkate CM, Disch FJM, et al. Anatomical aspects of sinus floor elevation. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2000. 11:256–265.
7. Jensen OT. The Sinus Bone Graft. 2006. 2nd edition. Quintessence Books;211–219.
8. Davies JE. In vitro modeling of the bone/implant interface. Anatomical Record. 1996. 245:426–445.
crossref
9. Wallace SS, Froum SJ. Effect of Maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol. 2003. 8:328–343.
crossref
10. Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, et al. Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004. 24:565–577.
crossref
11. Daelemans P, Hermans M, Godet F, et al. Autologous bone graft to augment the maxillary sinus in conjunction with immediate endosseous implants: a retrospective study up to 5 years. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1997. 17:27–39.
12. Hallman M, Sennerby L, Lundgren S. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002. 17:635–643.
13. Valentini P, Abensur DJ. Maxillary sinus grafting with anorganic bovine bone: A clinical report of long-term results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003. 18:556–560.
14. Piattelli M, Favero GA, Scarano A, et al. Bone reactions to anorganic bovine bone(BioOss) used in sinus augmentation procedures: A histologic long-term report of 20 cases in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999. 14:835–840.
15. Lee YM, Shin SY, Kim JY, et al. Bone reaction to bovine hydroxyapatite for maxillary sinus floor augmentation: Histologic results in humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006. 26:471–481.
16. Valentini P, Abensur D, Wenz B, et al. Sinus grafting with porous bone mineral(BioOss) for implant placement: A 5-year study on 15 patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000. 20:245–253.
17. Hammerle CHF, Chiantella GC, Karring T, et al. The effect of a deproteinized bovine bone mineral on bone regeneration around titanium dental implants. Clin Oral Impl Res. 1998. 9:151–162.
crossref
18. Valentini P, Abensur D, Densari D, et al. Histological evaluation of BioOss in a 2-stage sinus floor elevation and implantation procedure. A human case report. Clin Oral Impl Res. 1998. 9:59–64.
19. Scarano A, Pecora G, Piattelli M, et al. Osseointegration in a sinus augmented with bovine porous mineral: Histological results in an implant retrieved 4 years after insertion. A case report. J Periodontol. 2004. 75:1161–1166.
crossref
TOOLS
ORCID iDs

Seung-Min Yang
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8002-5800

Similar articles