Journal List > J Korean Acad Periodontol > v.39(Suppl) > 1049818

J Korean Acad Periodontol. 2009 Dec;39(4):407-412. Korean.
Published online December 31, 2009.  https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2009.39.4.407
Copyright © 2009 Korean Academy of Periodontology
Survey study of powered toothbrush with guiding device for oral hygiene improvement
Yun-Soo Park, Chul-Woo Lee, Byoung-Do Hahm, Ki-Tae Koo, Tae-Il Kim, Yang-Jo Seol, Yong-Moo Lee, In-Chul Rhyu, Young Gu and Chong-Pyoung Chung
Department of periodontology, School of dentistry, Seoul National University, Korea.

Correspondence: Dr. Tae-Il Kim. Department of periodontology, School of dentistry, Seoul National University, Yeongun-dong, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea. Email: periopf@snu.ac.kr , Tel: 82-2-2072-2642, Fax: 82-2-744-0051
Received November 24, 2009; Accepted December 01, 2009.

Abstract

Purpose

This study was performed to evaluate the effect of powered toothbrush with a wireless remote display on the subjective and objective oral hygiene improvement.

Methods

One hundred and fifteen subjects in healthy or mild gingivitis status between the ages of 20 and 90 were recruited and reviewed for study inclusion criteria. At first visit, 115 pre-screened subjects filled in the questionnaire form which consisted of demographic factors, behavioral factors (smoking, alcohol consumption), toothbrushing habits (brushing time and frequency), self-reported oral health status, and self-satisfaction. Baseline clinical indices (Plaque index, Gingival index) were also recorded by a periodontist. Subjects were instructed how to use powered toothbrush with a wireless remote display, and were provided with it. Thirty days after first visit, 90 subjects returned for the second assessment by self-reported questionnaire form and professional clinical checkup. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-test for the difference between baseline and second visit data. The relationship among variables was examined with chi-square test and Fisher's exact test.

Results

Significant differences were not found on self-reported satisfaction related with sex, smoking, alcohol consumption (P<0.05). Self-reported tooth brushing habit was improved in the aspect of brushing time and frequency. Significant differences were found on the self-reported oral health status, self-satisfaction, and clinical indices between the baseline and second visit data (P<0.01). Clinical indices were significantly reduced after using powered toothbrush with a wireless remote display (P<0.01). No adverse reactions were reported during the study period.

Conclusions

Powered toothbrush with a wireless remote display successfully promoted oral hygiene from the subjective and objective viewpoint after 30 days of home usage.

Keywords: oral hygiene; personal satisfaction; toothbrushing

Tables


Table 1
Satisfaction Difference Related with Sex, Alcohol Table 2. Distribution of Tooth Brushing Frequency (%) Consumption, Smoking about Old Tooth Brush
Click for larger image


Table 2
Distribution of Tooth Brushing Frequency (%)
Click for larger image


Table 3
Satisfaction Difference Related with Sex, Alcohol Consumption, Smoking about Powered Tooth Brush (P)
Click for larger image


Table 4
Regression Analysis of Satisfaction at 2nd visit (P)
Click for larger image


Table 5
Distribution of Satisfaction Before and After Using Powered Tooth Brush (Frequency)
Click for larger image


Table 6
Result of Plaque Index and Calculus Index
Click for larger image

Notes

This work was supported by Procter & Gamble Co.

References
1. Löe H, Theilade E, Jensen SB. Experimental gingivitis in man. J Periodontol 1965;36:177–187.
2. Theiladöe E, Jensen SB, Löe H. Experimental gingivitis in man. II. A longitudinal clinical and bacteriological investigation. J Periodontal Re 1966;1:1–13.
3. Schroeder HE, Lindhe J. Conversion of stable established gingivitis in the dog into destructive periodontitis. Arch Oral Biol 1975;20:775–782.
4. Axelsson P, Nyström B, Lindhe J. The long-term effect of a plaque control program on tooth mortality, caries and periodontal disease in adults. Results after 30 years of maintenance. J Clin Periodontol 2004;31:749–757.
5. Bakdash B. Current patterns of oral hygiene product use and practices. Periodontol 2000 1995;8:11–14.
6. Janusz Karen;Nelson Bruce,D Bartizek Robert.Impact of a novel power toothbrush with SmartGuide technology on brushing pressure and thoroughness. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008;9:1–8.
7. Scutt JS, Swann CJ. The first mechanical toothbrush? Br Dent J 1975;139:152.
8. Elliot JR. A comparison of the effectiveness of a standard and electric toothbrush. J Periodontol 1963;34:375–379.
9. Heasman PA, Stacey F, Heasman L. A comparative study of the Philips HP 735, Braun/Oral B D7 and the Oral B 35 Advantage toothbrushes. J Clin Periodontol 1999;26:85–90.
10. Ho HP, Niederman R. Effectiveness of the Sonicare sonic toothbrush on reduction of plaque, gingivitis, probing pocket depth and subgingival bacteria in adolescent orthodontic patients. J Clin Dent 1997;8:15–19.
11. Van der Weijden GA, Timmerman MF, Reijerse E. The long-term effect of an oscillating/rotating electric toothbrush on gingivitis. An 8-month clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 1994;21:139–145.
12. Ainamo J, Xie Q, Ainamo A, Kallio P. Assessment of the effect of an oscillating/rotating electric toothbrush on oral health. A 12-month longitudinal study. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:28–33.
13. Stoltze K, Bay L. Comparison of a manual and a new electric toothbrush for controlling plaque and gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol 1994;21:86–90.
14. He T, Carpinello L, Baker R. Safety of three toothbrushes. Am J Dent 2001;14:123–126.
15. Walters PA, Cugini M, Biesbrock AR, Warren PR. A novel oscillating-rotating power toothbrush with SmartGuide: designed for enhanced performance and compliance. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007;8:1–9.
16. Silness J, Löe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy II. correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol Scand 1964;22:121–135.
17. Löe H. The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems. J Periodontol 1967;38 Suppl:610–616.
18. Warren PR. Development of an oscillating/rotating/pulsating toothbrush: the Oral-B Professional Care Series. J Dent 2005;33 Suppl 1:1–9.
19. Heanue M, Deacon SA, Deery C, et al. Manual versus powered toothbrushing for oral health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;1:CD002281.
20. Rosema NA, Timmerman MF, Versteeg P. A comparison of the use of different modes of mechanical oral hygiene in prevention of plaque and gingivitis. J Periodontol 2008;79:1386–1394.
21. Van der Weijden GA, Timmerman MF, Piscaer M. Plaque removal by professional electric toothbrushing compared with professional polishing. J Clin Periodonto 2004;31:903–907.
22. Van der Weijden GA, Timmerman MF, Danser MM, et al. Approximal brush head used on a powered toothbrush. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:317–322.
23. Williams K, Ferrante A, Dockter K, et al. One- and 3-minute plaque removal by a battery-powered versus a manual toothbrush. J Periodontol 2004;75:1107–1113.
24. Van der Weijden FA, Timmerman MF, Snoek IM, Reijerse E, van der Velden U. Toothbrushing duration and plaque removing efficacy of electric toothbrushes. Am J Dent 1996;9:S31–S36.