Journal List > J Korean Acad Periodontol > v.39(Suppl) > 1049809

Kim, Hong, and Pang: The effect of the freeze dried bone allograft and gel/putty type demineralized bone matrix on osseous regeneration in the rat calvarial defects

Abstract

Purpose

This study was aimed to evaluate the effect of the Freeze Dried Bone Allograft and Demineralized Bone Matrix on osseous regeneration in the rat calvarial defects.

Methods

Eight mm critical-sized calvarial defects were created in the 80 male Sprague-Dawley rats. The animals were divided into 4 groups of 20 animals each. The defects were treated with Freeze Dried Bone Allograft(SureOss™), Demineralized Bone Matrix(ExFuse™ Gel, ExFuse™ Putty), or were left untreated for sham-surgery control and were evaluated by histologic and histomorphometric parameters following a 2 and 8 week healing intervals. Statistical analysis was done between each groups and time intervals with ANOVA and paired t-test.

Results

Defect closure, New bone area, Augmented area in the SureOss™, ExFuse™ Gel, ExFuse™ Putty groups were significantly greater than in the sham-surgery control group at each healing interval(P < 0.05). In the New bone area and Defect closure, there were no significant difference between experimental groups. Augmented area in the ExFuse™ Gel, ExFuse™ Putty groups were significantly greater than SureOss™ group at 2weeks(P < 0.05), however there was no significant difference at 8 weeks.

Conclusions

All of SureOss™, ExFuse™ Gel, ExFuse™ Putty groups showed significant new bone formation and augmentation in the calvarial defect model.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1
Schematic drawing of calvarial osteotomy defect showing the histomorphometric analysis.
jkape-39-349-g001
Figure 2
Representative photomicro graph of defect site receiving the sham-surgery at 2 weeks (arrow heads : defect margin ; HE stain, magnification × 20).
jkape-39-349-g002
Figure 3
Representative photomicro graph of defect site receiving the sham-surgery at 2 weeks (defect margin, PB : pre-existing bone, NB : new bone ; HE stain, magnification × 100).
jkape-39-349-g003
Figure 4
Representative photomicro graph of SureOss™ at 2 weeks (arrow heads : defect margin ; HE stain, magnification × 20).
jkape-39-349-g004
Figure 5
Representative photomicro graph of SureOss™ at 2 weeks (defect margin, PB : pre-existing bone, NB : new bone ; HE stain, magnification × 100).
jkape-39-349-g005
Figure 6
Representative photomicro graph of ExFuse™ Gel at 2 weeks (arrow heads : defect margin ; HE stain, magnification × 20).
jkape-39-349-g006
Figure 7
Representative photomicro graph of ExFuse™ Gel at 2 weeks (defect margin, PB : pre-existing bone, NB : new bone ; HE stain, magnification × 100).
jkape-39-349-g007
Figure 8
Representative photomicro graph of ExFuse™ Putty at 2 weeks (arrow heads : defect margin ; HE stain, magnification × 20).
jkape-39-349-g008
Figure 9
Representative photomicro graph of ExFuse™ Putty at 2 weeks (defect margin, PB : pre-existing bone, NB : new bone ; HE stain, magnification × 100).
jkape-39-349-g009
Figure 10
Representative photomicro graph of defect site receiving the sham-surgery at 8 weeks (arrow heads : (defect margin ; HE stain, magnification × 20).
jkape-39-349-g010
Figure 11
Representative photomicro graph of defect site receiving the sham-surgery at 8 weeks (defect margin, PB : pre-existing bone, NB : new bone ; HE stain, magnification × 100).
jkape-39-349-g011
Figure 12
Representative photomicro graph of SureOss™ at 8 weeks (arrow heads : defect margin ; HE stain, magnification × 20).
jkape-39-349-g012
Figure 13
Representative photomicro graph of SureOss™ at 8 weeks (defect margin, NB : new bone ; HE stain, magnification × 100).
jkape-39-349-g013
Figure 14
Representative photomicro graph of ExFuse™ Gel at 8 weeks (arrow heads : defect margin ; HE stain, magnification × 20).
jkape-39-349-g014
Figure 15
Representative photomicro graph of ExFuse™ Gel at 8 weeks (defect margin, NB : new bone ; HE stain, magnification × 100).
jkape-39-349-g015
Figure 16
Representative photomicro graph of ExFuse™ Putty at 8 weeks (arrow heads : defect margin ; HE stain, magnification × 20).
jkape-39-349-g016
Figure 17
Representative photomicro graph of ExFuse™ Putty at 8 weeks (defect margin, NB : new bone ; HE stain, magnification × 100).
jkape-39-349-g017
Table 1
Defect Closure (group means ± SD; n=10, %)
jkape-39-349-i001

*Statistically significant difference compared to surgical control group (P < 0.05).

Statistically significant difference compared to 2 weeks (P < 0.05).

Table 2
New Bone Area (group means ± SD; n=10, mm2)
jkape-39-349-i002

*Statistically significant difference compared to surgical control group (P < 0.05).

Statistically significant difference compared to 2 weeks (P < 0.05).

Table 3
Augmented Area (group means ± SD; n=10, mm2)
jkape-39-349-i003

*Statistically significant difference compared to surgical control group (P < 0.05).

§Statistically significant difference compared to SureOssTM group(P < 0.05).

Notes

This study was supported by HANS BIOMED.

References

1. Misch CE, Dietsh F. Bone-grafting materials in implant dentistry. Implant Dent. 1993. 2:158–167.
crossref
2. Lane JM. Bone graft substitutes. West J Med. 1995. 163:565–566.
3. Hislop WS, Finlay PM, Moos KF. A preliminary study into the uses of anorganic bone in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993. 31:149–153.
crossref
4. Rummelhart JM, Mellonig JT, Gray JL, Towle HJ. A comparison of freeze-dried bone allograft and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft in human periodontal osseous defects. J Periodontol. 1989. 60:655–663.
crossref
5. Kim Sung-Hee, Kim Chong Kwan, Chai Jung-kiu, Cho Kyoo-Sung. Histologic Study on Healing after Implantation of several Bone Substitutes in Rat Calvarial Defects. J Korean Acad Periodontol. 1994. 24:618–632.
crossref
6. Lee EJ, Chung HJ. Histologic Study on Healing after Implantation of several Bone Substitutes in Rat Calvarial Defects. J Korean Acad Periodontol. 1998. 28:87–102.
crossref
7. Schepers EJ, Ducheyne P, Barbier L, Schepers S. Bioactive glass particles of narrow size range: a new material for the repair of bone defects. Implant Dent. 1993. 2:151–156.
8. Urist MR, States BS. Bone formation by augmentation. Science. 1965. 150:892.
9. Libin BM, Ward HL, Fishman L. Decalcified, lyophilized bone allografts for use in human periodontal defects. J Periodontol. 1975. 46:51–56.
crossref
10. Acil Y, Springer IN, Broek V, Terheyden H, Jepsen S. Effects of bone morphogenetic protein-7 stimulation on osteoblasts cultured on different biomaterials. J Cell Biochem. 2002. 86:90–98.
crossref
11. Wikesjo UM, Sorensen RG, Kinoshita A, Wozney JM. RhBMP-2/alphaBSM induces significant vertical alveolar ridge augmentation and dental implant osseointegration. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2002. 4:174–182.
12. Piattelli A, Scarano A, Corigliano M, Piattelli M. Comparison of bone regeneration with the use of mineralized and demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts: a histological and histochemical study in man. Biomaterials. 1996. 17:1127–1131.
crossref
13. Bowers GM, Chadroff B, Carnevale R, et al. Histologic evaluation of new attachment apparatus formation in humans. Part I. J Periodontol. 1989. 60:664–674.
14. Bowers GM, Chadroff B, Carnevale R, et al. Histologic valuation of new attachment apparatus formation in humans. Part II. J Periodontol. 1989. 60:675–682.
15. Strates BS, Tiedeman JT. Contribution of osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties of demineralized bone matrix to skeletal repair. Eur J Exp Musculoskel Res. 1993. 2:61.
16. Chesmel Kathleen D, Branger Judith, Wertheim Heiman, Scarborough Nelson. Healing response to various forms of humans demineralized bone matrix in athymic rat cranial defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998. 56:857–863.
crossref
17. Bowers GM, Chadroff B, Carnevale R, et al. Histologic evaluation of new attachment apparatus formation in humans. Part III. J Periodontol. 1989. 60:683–693.
18. Hong So Mi, Herr Yeek, Kwon Young Hyuk, Park Joon Bong. Space-maintaining and osteopromotive effect of freeze-dried bone graft in the procedure of GBR. J Korean Acad Periodontol. 2004. 34:149–162.
crossref
19. Garg Arun K. Bone biology, harvesting, and grafting for dental implants : rationale and clinical applications. 2004. Quintessence;21–57.
20. Mellonig JT, Bowers GM, Cotton WR. Comparison of bone graft materials. Part II. New bone formation with autografts and allografts: a histological evaluation. J Periodontol. 1981. 52:297–302.
crossref
21. Mellonig JT, Bowers GM, Bright RW, Lawrence JJ. Clinical evaluation of freeze-dried bone allografts in periodontal osseous defects. J Periodontol. 1976. 47:125–131.
crossref
22. Sepe WW, Bowers GM, Lawrence JJ, Friedlaender GE, Koch RW. Clinical evaluation of freeze-dried bone allografts in periodontal osseous defects-part II. J Periodontol. 1978. 49:9–14.
crossref
23. Frame JW. Hydroxyapatite as a biomaterial for alveolar ridge augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987. 16:642–655.
crossref
24. Pinholt EM, Bang G, Haanaes HR. Alveolar ridge augmentation in rats by combined hydroxylapatite and osteoinductive material. Scand J Dent Res. 1991. 99:64–74.
crossref
25. Babbush CA. Histologic evaluation of human biopsies after dental augmentation with a demineralized bone matrix putty. Implant Dent. 2003. 12:325–332.
crossref
26. Matzenbacher SA, Mailhot JM, McPherson JC 3rd, et al. In vivo effectiveness of a glycerol-compounded demineralized freeze-dried bone xenograft in the rat calvarium. J Periodontol. 2003. 74:1641–1646.
crossref
27. Senn N. On the Healing of Aseptic Bone Cavities by Implantation of Antiseptic Decalcified Bone. Am J Med Sci. 1889. 10:352–368.
crossref
28. Mellonig JT, Bowers GM, Bright RW, Lawrence JJ. Clinical evaluation of freeze-dried bone allografts in periodontal osseous defects. J Periodontol. 1976. 47:125–131.
crossref
29. Meffert RM. Current usage of bone fill as an adjunct in implant dentistry. Dent Implantol Update. 1998. 9:9–12.
30. Herold RW, Pashley DH, Cuenin MF, et al. The effects of varying degrees of allograft decalcification on cultured porcine osteoclast cells. J Periodontol. 2002. 73:213–219.
crossref
31. Yukna RA, Vastardis S. Comparative evaluation of decalcified and non-decalcified freeze-dried bone allografts in rhesus monkeys. I. Histologic findings. J Periodontol. 2005. 76:57–65.
crossref
32. Rosen PS, Reynolds MA. A retrospective case series comparing the use of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft and freeze-dried bone allograft combined with enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of advanced osseous lesions. J Periodontol. 2002. 73:942–949.
crossref
33. Rummelhart JM, Mellonig JT, Gray JL, Towle HJ. A comparison of freeze-dried bone allograft and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft in human periodontal osseous defects. J Periodontol. 1989. 60:655–663.
crossref
34. Cammack GV 2nd, Nevins M, Clem DS 3rd, Hatch JP, Mellonig JT. Histologic evaluation of mineralized and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft for ridge and sinus augmentations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005. 25:231–237.
35. Kalish BP, Schuster GS, Peacock ME, Cuenin MF, et al. Influence of matrix-suspended demineralized bone on osseous repair using a critical-sized defect in the rat (Rattus norvegicus) calvarium. Oral Implantol. 2008. 34:83–89.
crossref
36. Bender SA, Rogalski JB, Mills MP, et al. Evaluation of demineralized bone matrix paste and putty in periodontal intraosseous defects. J Periodontol. 2005. 76:768–777.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles