Journal List > J Korean Acad Periodontol > v.37(Suppl) > 1049662

TOOLS
Myung, Lee, Chae, Jung, Kim, Cho, Chai, Kim, and Choi: A Retrospective study of the type of patients, the distribution of implant and the survival rate of Xive® implant
Original Article

The Journal of the Korean Academy of Periodontology 2007; 37(3): 523-534.

Published online: 30 September 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2007.37.3.523

A Retrospective study of the type of patients, the distribution of implant and the survival rate of Xive® implant

Woo-Chun Myung, Jung-Seok Lee, Gyung-Joon Chae, Ui-Won Jung, Chang-Sung Kim, Kyoo-Sung Cho, Jung-Kiu Chai, Chong-Kwan Kim, Seong-Ho Choi

Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Korea.

Corresponding Author (shchoi726@yumc.yonsei.ac.kr)

Copyright © 2007 Korean Academy of Periodontology

Abstract

This study is an analysis of types of patients and distribution of implant site and survival rate of Xive® implant.
The following results on patient type, implant distribution and survival rate were compiled from 324 implant cases of 140 patients treated at the periodontal dept. of Yonsei University Hospital and G dental clinic between February 2003 and April 2006.

  1. There are no dissimilarities between men and women, with patients in their 30, 40, 50s accounting for 80% of patients and accounted for 82% of implant treatments; the largest share of patients and implant treatments.

  2. Mn. posterior area accounted for 57% of implant treatments followed by Mx. posterior area(29%), Mx. anterior area(8%) and Mn. anterior area(6%).

  3. Partial edentulous patients treated by single crown and bridge-type prosthesis accounted for 96% and fully edentulous patient accounted for the remaining 4%.

  4. The major cause of tooth loss is periodontal disease, followed by dental caries, trauma and congenital missing.

  5. The distribution of bone quality for maxillae was 54.2% for typeIII, followed by 30.8% for type II, 15% for typeIV and 0% for typeI. As for mandible, the distribution was 63% for typeII, followed by 34% for typeIII, 2.5% for typeI and 0.5% for typeIV.

  6. The distribution of bone quantity for maxillae was 55% for type C, followed by 35% for type B, 8% for type D and 2% for type A. As for mandible, the distribution was 60% for type B, followed by 32% for type C, 7% for type A and 0% for type D.

  7. The majority of implants were those of 9.5-13 mm in length(95%) and regular diameter in width(82%).

  8. The total survival rate was 98%.

    The survival rate was 97% in the maxillae region and 99% in the mandible region.

  9. The survival rate in typeI was 83%, in typeII was 99%, in typeIII was 97% and in typeIV was 100%. As for the bone quantity, the survival rate in type A and D(100%) was most, followed by type B(99%) and type C(96%).

The results showed that Xive® implant could be used satisfactorily compare for the other implant system. But we most to approach carefully in certain extreme condition especially with poor bone quality and quantity.

Keywords: Xive® implant, Patient type, Implant distribution, Survival rate

TOOLS
Similar articles