Journal List > Ann Dermatol > v.27(4) > 1046035

Chae, Sim, Kim, Jang, Lee, Kim, and Lee: Button Osteoma: A Review of Ten Cases

Abstract

Background

Button osteoma presents as small circumscribed ivory-like lumps on the skull vault. Although not rare, its diagnosis can be challenging for dermatologists.

Objective

To clarify the clinical characteristics of button osteoma by reviewing 10 cases.

Methods

Ten patients diagnosed with button osteoma at the Department of Dermatology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, between January 2011 and August 2014 were enrolled. We retrospectively reviewed medical records and analyzed demographic and clinical characteristics including sex, age, sites, number of lesions, symptoms, duration, histopathological finding, radiological findings, and treatment.

Results

All patients presented with an asymptomatic small circumscribed hard lump fixed to a bony structure. There were 9 female and 1 male patient, and the mean age was 54 years (range, 28~61 years). The most common site was the forehead, and disease duration ranged from 2 weeks to more than 20 years. The differential diagnosis included cranial exostosis, ballooned osteoma, epidermal cyst, and lipoma. Simple radiography, ultrasonography, and computed tomography (CT) were used to make a confirmative diagnosis. Histopathological findings showed lamellated bony structures with poor vascularization. Ostectomy was performed for 5 patients, and no recurrence was detected within an average of 13.4 months after treatment.

Conclusion

This review characterized button osteoma. Surgical excision is a useful therapeutic modality after CT-based diagnosis. Further studies with more patients are required to confirm the findings.

INTRODUCTION

Osteoma, a benign and slow-growing osteogenic tumor, is composed of well-differentiated mature bone tissue and is characterized by the proliferation of compact or cancellous bone1. Favorable sites of osteoma are the cranial vault and facial skeleton. Although the most common site of cranial osteomas is the frontal sinus, osteomas only involving frontal bone periosteum are occasionally observed2. Anthropologists have traditionally referred to small circumscribed bony lumps on the skull vault as button osteoma3. Cranial button osteoma has usually been diagnosed and treated in the Department of Neurosurgery or Plastic Surgery in Korean hospitals; however, dermatologists often encounter patients presenting with asymptomatic bony lumps on the forehead. Although button osteoma is easy to diagnose by radiological examinations such as simple radiography, ultrasonography (USG), and computed tomography (CT), dermatologists are unfamiliar with its diagnosis or surgical treatment using an osteotome and mallet. Here, we report the clinical characteristics of 10 patients with button osteomas who visited our hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective review involved the medical records of 10 patients diagnosed with button osteoma at the Department of Dermatology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, between January 2011 and August 2014. Patients' medical records included photographs, clinical information, histopathological information, and radiological images.
We analyzed demographic and clinical characteristics through medical record review, such as sex, age, sites, number of lesions, symptoms, disease duration, histopathological finding, radiological findings, and treatment.

RESULTS

Clinical features

1) Sex, age, and disease duration

Among the 10 patients, there were 9 women and 1 man. The mean age was 54.3 years, ranging from 28 to 61 years (Table 1). The mean disease duration was 60.1 months, ranging from 2 weeks to 20 years.

2) Sites and symptoms

Button osteoma developed on the forehead in the majority of patients, except for 1 patient who presented with button osteoma on the vertex (Table 1). The chief complaint of all patients was palpable lumps without pain or tenderness (Fig. 1).

3) Number of lesions

All patients had only 1 bony lump on their cranial vault (Table 1). None had multiple button osteomas such as satellite, nested, or disseminated osteoma.

4) Differential diagnosis

Button osteoma of the forehead should be differentiated from cranial exostosis, ballooned osteoma, epidermal cyst, and frontalis-associated lipoma including intramuscular lipoma4. Eight patients were initially diagnosed with button osteoma, and one each was diagnosed with intramuscular lipoma and epidermal cyst (Table 1).

Radiological findings

Most patients were evaluated by simple skull radiography (Fig. 2A), USG (Fig. 2B), or CT (Fig. 2C) (Table 1). Bony lumps were identified in the forehead through radiological examination. Among these 3 methods, USG was most commonly used to diagnose button osteoma.

Histopathological findings

Histopathological findings showed compact and mature bone with lacunae (Fig. 3).

Treatment

Ostectomy with a chisel and mallet was performed for 5 patients. Under local anesthesia, skin was incised horizontally along the wrinkle line. The superficial frontalis fascia, frontalis muscle, and deep frontalis fascia were cut vertically. The button osteoma was cleaved from the skull with a chisel and mallet. Finally, a primary suture was made for wound closure of the frontalis muscle and skin incision line. Among the 5 patients who did not receive treatment, 1 is scheduled to undergo ostectomy, while the others are merely undergoing observation.

Postsurgical adverse events and recurrence

There were no severe postoperative complications, and no recurrence was detected within an average of 13.4 months after the operation.

DISCUSSION

Button osteoma is not a rare disease and usually presents with asymptomatic small (rarely >1 cm in diameter) bony lumps on the parietal or frontal bone35. There is no difference in the incidence of button osteoma with respect to ethnicity3. However, the incidence between sexes remains controversial356. As for sexual preponderance in our study, button osteoma was 9 times more common in female patients than in male patients. Button osteoma commonly occurs in the second through fifth decades of life25.
However, in the present study, 8 of 10 patients were in the fifth and sixth decades of life. Although the precise etiology of button osteoma remains unknown, it may be related to trauma, infection, developmental abnormalities, etc.7.
The differential diagnosis of button osteoma includes metastatic cancer, subcutaneous hematoma, lipoma, epidermal cyst, and ballooned osteoma. Plain radiography, USG, and CT are useful for diagnosis2. Button osteoma is generally visualized as radiopaque bone lesions including the outer table of the skull8. In the present study, USG was commonly used for imaging bony anatomy, although CT is the best diagnostic imaging tool for button osteoma.
Surgical removal of button osteoma, including ostectomy, curettage, endoscopic surgery, and CO2 laser cauterization, is usually performed for good cosmesis91011. In the present study, ostectomy with a chisel and mallet was used to treat frontal button osteomas. Asymptomatic small frontal osteomas may be followed up at 6-month intervals by physical examination2. Some authors recommend asymptomatic small osteomas should be removed to prevent aggravation or rule out malignancy212.
In conclusion, this study characterized button osteoma. Korean dermatologists need to familiarize themselves with this disease. Further studies with more patients are required to confirm the present results.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

A solitary well-defined asymptomatic nodule 1.3 cm in diameter is seen on the forehead. Inset: close-up view of the lesion.

ad-27-394-g001
Fig. 2

(A) Simple radiography shows a well-defined smooth homogenous bony density (arrow) on the frontal bone. (B) Ultrasonography shows a 1.4 cm smooth and round bony protuberance (arrow) on the frontal bone. (C) Computed tomography shows a 1.3 cm well-defined homogenous radiopaque lesion (arrow) on the frontal area.

ad-27-394-g002
Fig. 3

Histopathological examination shows compact and mature bone with lacunae (H&E, ×200).

ad-27-394-g003
Table 1

Summary of clinical characteristics of patients

ad-27-394-i001

CT: computed tomography, USG: ultrasonography.

References

1. Haddad FS, Haddad GF, Zaatari G. Cranial osteomas: their classification and management. Report on a giant osteoma and review of the literature. Surg Neurol. 1997; 48:143–147.
crossref
2. Patel TR, Borah GL. Frontal bone periosteal osteomas. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 114:648–651.
crossref
3. Eshed V, Latimer B, Greenwald CM, Jellema LM, Rothschild BM, Wish-Baratz S, et al. Button osteoma: its etiology and pathophysiology. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2002; 118:217–230.
crossref
4. Chun YS, Yoon KH, Choi HJ, Kim LS. Intramuscular lipoma of the frontalis muscle. Ann Dermatol. 1999; 11:98–100.
crossref
5. Tucker WS, Nasser-Sharif FJ. Benign skull lesions. Can J Surg. 1997; 40:449–455.
6. Bracaglia R, Fortunato R, Marando A, Farallo E. Frontal exostose resection during an endoscopic subperiosteal lifting: case report. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1997; 21:122–124.
crossref
7. Summers LE, Mascott CR, Tompkins JR, Richardson DE. Frontal sinus osteoma associated with cerebral abscess formation: a case report. Surg Neurol. 2001; 55:235–239.
crossref
8. Saraç K, Biliciler B, Vatansever M, AladaXMLLink_XYZ MA, Colak A. Unusual frontal osteoma, mimicking a haemangioma. Neuroradiology. 1996; 38:458–459.
crossref
9. Boffano P, Roccia F, Campisi P, Gallesio C. Review of 43 osteomas of the craniomaxillofacial region. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 70:1093–1095.
crossref
10. Yamamoto T, Alvarado Gutierrez JL, Koshima I. Incisionless osteotomy for contouring the skull: pinhole osteo-chipping with irrigation for the esthetic treatment of a benign frontal osteoma. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014; 67:e270–e272.
crossref
11. Onishi K, Maruyama Y, Sawaizumi M. Endoscopic excision of forehead osteoma. J Craniofac Surg. 1995; 6:516–518.
12. Sewell LD, Adams DC, Marks VJ. Subcutaneous forehead nodules: attention to the button osteoma and frontalisassociated lipoma. Dermatol Surg. 2008; 34:791–798.
crossref
TOOLS
ORCID iDs

Weon Ju Lee
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5708-1305

Similar articles