The Effect of the Cancer Genetic Education Program for Nurses

Kyung Sook Choi; Eun Sil Jang; Myung-Hee Jun; Ji-Young Jung; Jung Ae Park

doi:10.5388/jkon.2010.10.2.240

Journal List > J Korean Oncol Nurs > v.10(2) > 1044412

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Choi, Jang, Jun, Jung, and Park: The Effect of the Cancer Genetic Education Program for Nurses

Original Article

Journal of Korean Oncology Nursing

Journal of Korean Oncology Nursing 2010; 10(2): 240-246.

Published online: 31 August 2010

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5388/jkon.2010.10.2.240

The Effect of the Cancer Genetic Education Program for Nurses

Kyung Sook Choi¹, Eun Sil Jang², Myung-Hee Jun³, Ji-Young Jung⁴, Jung Ae Park⁵

¹Professor, Department of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.

²Candidate for Doctoral Degree, Department of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.

³Professor, Department of Nursing, Daejeon University, Daejeon, Korea.

⁴Adjunct Professor, Department of Nursing, Chungnam University, Daejeon, Korea.

⁵Doctoral Student, Department of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.

Address reprint requests to: Park, Jung Ae. Department of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, 221 Heukseok-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 156-756, Korea. Tel: 82-2-820-5672, Fax: 82-2-824-7961, poo0314@empal.com

Received 25 June 2010 Accepted 2 August 2010

Abstract

Purpose

Advancing genetic knowledge for oncology nurses is especially important in Korea because physicians have launched to incorporate genetic risk assessment and genetic testing into their practice. The purpose of this paper was to identify the effect of the first academic cancer genetic risk assessment and counseling course for Korean nurses.

Methods

Thirty-five nurses were recruited and educated from June 8 to 14, 2006 in Seoul, Korea. Two measurement tools were used: 'knowledge about the hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC)' and 'knowledge about the cancer genetics'.

Results

Students' score of knowledge about HBOC at pre-education was 12.22±2.23, and after education, it increased to 13.62±1.76. This change was statistically significant (t=-3.253, p=.003). The score of knowledge about cancer genetics at pre-education was 11.31±3.44, and after education it has increased to 16.17±1.94. It also was statistically significant (t=-6.92, p=.000).

Conclusion

This program was effective to be a starting point for establishing genetic educational planning for the oncology nurses in Korea. This academically-based course is recognized as valuable by oncology nurses. With this new knowledge, nurses can begin to expand their role in delivering comprehensive cancer care services in Korea.

Keywords: Genetic counseling, Nursing education, Cancer, Knowledge

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

Research Design. HBOC, The Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer; KCG, The Knowledge about the Cancer Genetics.

Table 1

Characteristics of subjects (N=35)

^*Mean±SD.

Table 2

The change of the HBOC and KCG after education program (N=35)

Table 3

The score of satisfaction with the program (N=35)

References

1. Jun MH. Cancer genetic counseling Nursing. 2008. 2nd ed. Seoul: Daihaks Book Inc.

2. You KM. The study on the demand analysis and perspective of genetic test. 2006. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare.

3. Lee CH, Roh JW. Clinical approach of hereditary cancer in gynecology. Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 2009. 52:1–16.

4. Kim KS, Kim SW, Lee MH, Ahn SH, Park SK. Korean Breast Cancer Society. Practice patterns of surgeon for the management of hereditary breast cancer in Korea. J Breast Cancer. 2008. 11:95–101.

5. Choi KS, Jun MH, Ahn SH, Anderson G. Implementing and evaluating a nurse led hereditary cancer genetics educational program in a Korean breast cancer surgery clinic. J Korean Acad Adult Nurs. 2008. 20:815–828.

6. Kim SH. Rare genetic disorders and educational content development for practitioners. 2006. Seoul: Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

7. McCann B, MacAuley D, Barnett Y, Bunting B, Bradley A, Jeffers L, et al. Cancer Genetics: consultants' perceptions of their roles, confidence and satisfaction with knowledge. J Eval Clin Pract. 2007. 13:276–286.

8. Tranin AS, Masny A, Jenkins J. Genetics in oncology practice: cancer risk assessment. 2003. Pittsburgh: Oncology Nurse Society.

9. Bilgin KV, Ayse GT, Nevin KK, Ayten T. Nursing student's self-reported knowledge of genetics and genetic education. Public Health Genomics. 2009. 12:225–232.

10. Choi KS, Jun MH, Anderson G. The first Korean cancer genetic counseling program for nurses. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ. 2006. 9:104–114.

11. Choi KS, Jun MH, Tae YS, So HS, Eun Y, Suh SR, et al. The knowledge of hereditary breast cancer in Korean nurses. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ. 2006. 12:272–279.

12. Choi KS, Jun MH, Tae YS, So HS, Eun Y, Hur MH, et al. Physicians' knowledge about hereditary breast cancer in South Korea. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ. 2007. 13:105–113.

13. Gu BK. Comparison of knowledge according to the risk of hereditary breast cancer [dissertation]. 2007. Seoul: Ewha Womans Univ..

14. Erblich J, Brown K, Kim Y, Valdimarsdottir HB, Livingstone BE, Bovbjerg DH. Development and validation of a breast cancer genetic counseling knowledge questionnaire. Patient Education and Counseling. 2005. 56:182–191.

15. Ondrusek N, Warner E, Goel V. Development of a knowledge scale about breast cancer and heredity (BCHK). Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 1999. 53:69–75.

16. Oncology Nursing Society. ONS genetics short course for cancer nurses: What's your role in the genetics revolution? 2005. Pittsburgh: Oncology Nursing Society.

17. Lashley FR. Thinking about genetics in new ways. J Nurs Schol. 1997. 29:202.

18. George JB. Genetics: challenges for nursing education. J Pediatr Nurs. 1992. 7:5–8.

19. Choi JY, Kim HJ. A study on genetic counseling curriculum, accreditation of the training program, and the certification process of genetic counselors in Korea. J Genet Med. 2009. 6:38–55.

20. Blazer KR, MacDonald DJ, Ricker C, Sand S, CUman G, Weitzel JN. Outcomes from intensive training in genetic cancer risk counseling for clinicians. J Genet Med. 2005. 7:40–47.

21. Carroll JC, Rideout AL, Wilson BJ, Allanson J, Blaine SM, Esplen MJ, et al. Genetic education for primary care providers; Improving attitudes, knowledge, and confidence. Can Fam Physician. 2009. 55:92–99.

22. Masny A, Daly M, Ross E, Balshem A, Gillespie D, Weil S. A training course for oncology nurses in familial cancer risk assessment: evaluation of knowledge and practice. J Cancer Educ. 2003. 18:20–25.

TOOLS

Similar articles