Questionnaires for Assessing Stress and Mental Health

In Hwan Hwang; Dong Hoon Oh

doi:10.7599/hmr.2014.34.2.91

Journal List > Hanyang Med Rev > v.34(2) > 1044218

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Hwang and Oh: Questionnaires for Assessing Stress and Mental Health

Review Article

Hanyang Medical Reviews 2014; 34(2): 91-95.

Published online: 23 May 2014

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7599/hmr.2014.34.2.91

Questionnaires for Assessing Stress and Mental Health

In Hwan Hwang, Dong Hoon Oh

Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine and Institute of Mental Health, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.

Correspondence to: Dong Hoon Oh. Department of Psychiatry, Hanyang University College of Medicine, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Sundong-gu, Seoul 133-791, Korea. Tel: +82-2-2290-8423, Fax: +82-2-2298-2055, odh@hanyang.ac.kr

Received 4 March 2014 Revised 18 April 2014 Accepted 23 April 2014

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Psychological factors can influence physical health. The relationship between psychological stress and physical disease is evident in everyday clinical practice and therefore, assessing stress and mental health has been an important issue in clinical practice and research. This review discusses the assessment of stress and mental health by examining the psychometric parameters and other qualities of some of the best-known instruments used to assess stress and mental health. At present, the questionnaire method is the most popular for measuring stress and mental health status. There are many different kinds of questionnaires for assessing mental stress; each questionnaire has its own advantages and disadvantages. The authors' intend to evaluate and summarize useful questionnaires for assessing stress and mental health in order to aid in choosing the appropriate questionnaire according to the clinical purpose of the examination.

Keywords: Stress, Psychological, Mental Health, Psychometrics, Questionnaire

References

1. Lipsitt DR. Consultation-liaison psychiatry and psychosomatic medicine: the company they keep. Psychosom Med. 2001; 63:896–909.

2. Holmes TH, Rahe RH. The social readjustment rating scale. J Psychosom Res. 1967; 11:213–218.

3. Lee PS. A methodological research on the measurement of stress. Seoul: The graduate school of Nursing Science, Yonsei University;1984. 138. Unpublished PhD thesis.

4. Frank SH, Zyzanski SJ. Stress in the clinical setting: the brief encounter psychosocial instrument. J Fam Pract. 1988; 26:533–539.

5. Yim JH, Bae JM, Choi SS, Kim SW, Hwang HS, Huh BY. The validity of modified Korean-translated BEPSI (Brief Encounter Psychosocial Instrument) as instrument of stress measurement in outpatient clinic. J Korean Acad Fam Med. 1996; 17:42–53.

6. Koh KB, Park JK. Development of the cognitive stress response scale. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 2004; 43:320–328.

7. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12:189–198.

8. Escobar JI, Burnam A, Karno M, Forsythe A, Landsverk J, Golding JM. Use of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in a community population of mixed ethnicity. Cultural and linguistic artifacts. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1986; 174:607–614.

9. Kwon YC, Park JH. Korean version of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-K): Part I. Development of the test for the elderly. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 1989; 28:125–135.

10. Kang Y, Na DL, Han SH. A vailidity study on the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) in dementia patients. J Korean Neurol Assoc. 1997; 15:300–308.

11. Lee JH, Lee KU, Lee DY, Kim KW, Jhoo JH, Kim JH, et al. Development of the Korean version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Packet (CERAD-K): clinical and neuropsychological assessment batteries. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002; 57:P47–P53.

12. Park JH, Park YN, Ko HJ. Modification of the mini-mental state examination for use with the elderly in a non-western society. Part II: Cutoff points and their diagnostic validities. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1991; 6:875–882.

13. Kim TH, Jhoo JH, Park JH, Kim JL, Ryu SH, Moon SW, et al. Korean version of mini mental status examination for dementia screening and its' short form. Psychiatry Investig. 2010; 7:102–108.

14. Beck AT, Steer RA, Garbin MG. Psychometric properties of the beck depression inventory-25 years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev. 1988; 8:77–100.

15. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961; 4:561–571.

16. Hahn HM, Yum TH, Shin YW, Kim KH, Yoon DJ, Chung KJ. A standardization study of beck depression inventory in Korea. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 1986; 25:487–500.

17. Lee MK, Lee YH, Park SH, Son CH, Jung YJ, Hong SG, et al. A Standardization Study of Beck Depression Inventory 1-Korean Version (K-BDI). Korean J Psychopathol. 1995; 4:77–95.

18. Domken M, Scott J, Kelly P. What factors predict discrepancies between self and observer ratings of depression? J Affect Disord. 1994; 31:253–259.

19. Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977; 1:385–401.

20. Roberts RE, Rhoades HM, Vernon SW. Using the CES-D scale to screen for depression and anxiety: effects of language and ethnic status. Psychiatry Res. 1990; 31:69–83.

21. Shima S, Shirano T, Kitamura T. New rating scale for depression. Clin Psychiatry. 1985; 42:865–878.

22. Cho MJ, Kim KH. Diagnostic validity of the CES-D (Korean version) in the Assessment of DSM-III-R major depression. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 1993; 32:381–399.

23. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001; 16:606–613.

24. Choi HS, Choi JH, Park KH, Joo KJ, Ga H, Ko HJ, et al. Standardization of the Korean version of patient health questionnaire-9 as a screening instrument for major depressive disorder. J Korean Acad Fam Med. 2007; 28:114–119.

25. Park SJ, Choi HR, Choi JH, Kim KW, Hong JP. Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Anxiety Mood. 2010; 6:119–122.

26. An JY, Seo ER, Lim KH, Shin JH, Kim JB. Standardization of the Korean version of screening tool for depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9, PHQ-9). J Korean Soc Biol Ther Psychiatry. 2013; 19:47–56.

27. Yesavage JA. Geriatric depression scale. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1988; 24:709–711.

28. Mitchell AJ, Bird V, Rizzo M, Meader N. Diagnostic validity and added value of the geriatric depression scale for depression in primary care: a meta-analysis of GDS30 and GDS15. J Affect Disord. 2010; 125:10–17.

29. Jung IK, Kwak DI, Shin DK, Lee MS, Lee HS, Kim JY. A reliability and validity study of geriatric depression scale. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 1997; 36:103–122.

30. Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, Steer RA. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988; 56:893–897.

31. Yook SP, Kim JS. A clinical study on the Korean version of beck anxiety inventory: comparative study of patient and non-patient. Korean J Clin Psychol. 1997; 16:185–197.

32. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983; 67:361–370.

33. Oh SM, Min KJ, Park DB. A study on the standardization of the hospital anxiety and depression scale for Koreans: a comparison of normal, depressed and anxious groups. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 1999; 38:289–296.

34. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998; 59:Suppl 20. 22–33. quiz 4-57.

35. Yoo SW, Kim YS, Noh JS, Oh KS, Kim CH, Namkoong K, et al. Validity of Korean version of mini international neuropsychiatric interview. Anxiety Mood. 2006; 2:50–55.

36. Lim SW, Song HS, Oh YH, Shin HC, Cho KH, Chung SK. A validation study of the abbreviated self-rated Korean version of MINI (MINI Patient Health Survey). Anxiety Mood. 2007; 3:32–40.

37. Lubben JE. Assessing social networks among elderly populations. Health Promot Maint. 1988; 11:42–52.

38. Lubben JE, Gironda M. Centrality of social ties to the health and well-being of older adults. In : Berkman B, Harootyan L, editors. Social work and health care in an aging society. New York: Springer Publishing;2003. p. 319–350.

39. Lee KW, Kim SY, Chung W, Hwang GS, Hwang YW, Hwang IH. The validity and reliability of Korean version of lubben social network scale. Korean J Fam Med. 2009; 30:352–358.

40. Sherbourne D, Stewart AL. The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med. 1991; 32:705–714.

41. Lim MK, Kim MH, Shin YJ, Yoo WS, Yang BM. Social support and self-rated health status in a low income neighborhood of Seoul, Korea. Korean J Prev Med. 2003; 36:54–62.

42. Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Covi L. SCL-90: an outpatient psychiatric rating scale--preliminary report. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1973; 9:13–28.

43. Derogatis LR. SCL-90-R: administration, scoring, and procedures manual II. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Clinical Psychometric Research;1983.

44. Kim JH, Kim GI. The standardization study of symptom checklist-90-revision in Korea III. Ment Health Res. 1984; 2:278–311.

TOOLS

Similar articles