Journal List > Hanyang Med Rev > v.33(3) > 1044157

Lee, Park, Jeong, Lee, and Moon: Adverse Effects of Ureteral Stent and Development of the Antireflux Ureteral Stent

Abstract

The double J ureteral stent (D-J stent) represents the ureteral catheter widely used nowadays. The main purpose of the D-J stent is to resolve ureteral obstruction caused by intraureteral or extra-ureteral etiologies. Indications of D-J stents have been extended and it has become one of the most important surgical instruments that protect the kidney and ureter. The ideal D-J stent should be easy to insert and remove and should not cause any adverse effects in vivo. In addition, it has to function well. However, there has been no immaculate D-J stent because our body conceives the ureteral stent as a foreign object and numerous developments are being made in order to overcome it. Vesicoureteral reflux, one of the adverse effects of the D-J stent, is the most troublesome adverse effect because it may scar the renal parenchyma, leading to permanent deterioration of renal function. This review is to discuss adverse effects of ureteral stents and to present the novel antireflux D-J stent that may reduce vesicoureteral reflux.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1
Normal position and shape of D-J ureteral catheter in the right ureter.
hmr-33-178-g001
Fig. 2
Biomaterials of ureteral stents. (A) Polyurethane, (B) Metal.
hmr-33-178-g002
Fig. 3
Malposition of D-J ureteral catheter in the left ureter. (A) The proximal tip of D-J ureteral catheter looks like "fish reeling" which means the typical shape of malposition. (B) The proximal tip of D-J ureteral catheter is in the upper ureter lumen.
hmr-33-178-g003
Fig. 4
Migration of distal tip of the D-J ureteral catheter to the bladder neck.
hmr-33-178-g004
Fig. 5
Schematic design of antireflux valve with 4 flaps: (A) P1<P2 (Open), (B) P1>P2 (Close). *P (Pressure).
hmr-33-178-g005
Fig. 6
Photo images of the antireflux stent. (A) Antireflux valve, (B) D-J stent bonded with an antireflux valve, (C) D-J stent connected to guide wire.
hmr-33-178-g006

References

1. Zimskind PD, Fetter TR, Wilkerson JL. Clinical use of long-term indwelling silicone rubber ureteral splints inserted cystoscopically. J Urol. 1967; 97:840–844.
crossref
2. Finney RP. Experience with new double J ureteral catheter stent. J Urol. 1978; 120:678–681.
crossref
3. Lumiaho J, Heino A, Aaltomaa S, Valimaa T, Talja M. A short biodegradable helical spiral ureteric stent provides better antireflux and drainage properties than a double-J stent. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2011; 45:129–133.
crossref
4. Dyer RB, Chen MY, Zagoria RJ, Regan JD, Hood CG, Kavanagh PV. Complications of ureteral stent placement. Radiographics. 2002; 22:1005–1022.
crossref
5. Damiano R, Oliva A, Esposito C, De Sio M, Autorino R, D'Armiento M. Early and late complications of double pigtail ureteral stent. Urol Int. 2002; 69:136–140.
crossref
6. Joshi HB, Okeke A, Newns N, Keeley FX Jr, Timoney AG. Characterization of urinary symptoms in patients with ureteral stents. Urology. 2002; 59:511–516.
crossref
7. Moon KT, Cho HJ, Cho JM, Kang JY, Yoo TK, Moon HS, et al. Comparison of an Indwelling Period Following Ureteroscopic Removal of Stones between Double-J Stents and Open-Ended Catheters: A Prospective, Pilot, Randomized, Multicenter Study. Korean J Urol. 2011; 52:698–702.
crossref
8. Cummings LJ, Waters SL, Wattis JA, Graham SJ. The effect of ureteric stents on urine flow: reflux. J Math Biol. 2004; 49:56–82.
crossref
9. Al-Aown A, Kyriazis I, Kallidonis P, Kraniotis P, Rigopoulos C, Karnabatidis D, et al. Ureteral stents: new ideas, new designs. Ther Adv Urol. 2010; 2:85–92.
crossref
10. Venkatesan N, Shroff S, Jayachandran K, Doble M. Polymers as ureteral stents. J Endourol. 2010; 24:191–198.
crossref
11. Pedro RN, Hendlin K, Kriedberg C, Monga M. Wire-based ureteral stents: impact on tensile strength and compression. Urology. 2007; 70:1057–1059.
crossref
12. Liatsikos E, Kallidonis P, Stolzenburg JU, Karnabatidis D. Ureteral stents: past, present and future. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2009; 6:313–324.
crossref
13. Pollard SG, Macfarlane R. Symptoms arising from Double-J ureteral stents. J Urol. 1988; 139:37–38.
crossref
14. Lennon GM, Thornhill JA, Sweeney PA, Grainger R, McDermott TE, Butler MR. 'Firm' versus 'soft' double pigtail ureteric stents: a randomised blind comparative trial. Eur Urol. 1995; 28:1–5.
crossref
15. Chua ME, Morales ML Jr. Spontaneous fracture of indwelling polyurethane ureteral stents: A case series and review of literature. Can Urol Assoc J. 2012; 6:386–392.
crossref
16. Slaton JW, Kropp KA. Proximal ureteral stent migration: an avoidable complication? J Urol. 1996; 155:58–61.
crossref
17. Singh I, Gupta NP, Hemal AK, Aron M, Seth A, Dogra PN. Severely encrusted polyurethane ureteral stents: management and analysis of potential risk factors. Urology. 2001; 58:526–531.
crossref
18. Robert M, Boularan AM, El Sandid M, Grasset D. Double-J ureteric stent encrustations: clinical study on crystal formation on polyurethane stents. Urol Int. 1997; 58:100–104.
crossref
19. Somers WJ. Management of forgotten or retained indwelling ureteral stents. Urology. 1996; 47:431–435.
crossref
20. Arshad M, Shah SS, Abbasi MH. Applications and complications of polyurethane stenting in urology. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2006; 18:69–72.
21. Kumar M, Aron M, Agarwal AK, Gupta NP. Stenturia: An unusual manifestation of spontaneous ureteral stent fragmentation. Urol Int. 1999; 62:114–116.
crossref
22. Bergqvist D, Parsson H, Sherif A. Arterio-ureteral fistula--a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001; 22:191–196.
23. el-Faqih SR, Shamsuddin AB, Chakrabarti A, Atassi R, Kardar AH, Osman MK, et al. Polyurethane internal ureteral stents in treatment of stone patients: morbidity related to indwelling times. J Urol. 1991; 146:1487–1491.
crossref
24. Griffiths DJ. Dynamics of the upper urinary tract: I. Peristaltic flow through a distensible tube of limited length. Phys Med Biol. 1987; 32:813–822.
crossref
25. Griffiths DJ, Constantinou CE, Mortensen J, Djurhuus JC. Dynamics of the upper urinary tract: II. The effect of variations of peristaltic frequency and bladder pressure on pyeloureteral pressure/flow relations. Phys Med Biol. 1987; 32:823–833.
crossref
26. Mosli HA, Farsi HM, al-Zimaity MF, Saleh TR, al-Zamzami MM. Vesicoureteral reflux in patients with double pigtail stents. J Urol. 1991; 146:966–969.
crossref
27. Irani J, Siquier J, Pires C, Lefebvre O, Dore B, Aubert J. Symptom characteristics and the development of tolerance with time in patients with indwelling double-pigtail ureteric stents. BJU Int. 1999; 84:276–279.
crossref
28. Maheshwari PN, Andankar MG, Khera R, Stone RG. The indwelling ureteric stent: a 'friendly' procedure with unfriendly high morbidity. BJU Int. 2000; 86:757–758.
crossref
29. Richter S, Ringel A, Shalev M, Nissenkorn I. The indwelling ureteric stent: a 'friendly' procedure with unfriendly high morbidity. BJU Int. 2000; 85:408–411.
crossref
30. Tschada R, Mickisch G, Rassweiler J, Knebel L, Alken P. [Success and failure with double J ureteral stent. Analysis of 107 cases]. J Urol (Paris). 1991; 97:93–97.
31. Hubner WA, Plas EG, Trigo-Rocha F, Tanagho EA. Drainage and reflux characteristics of antireflux ureteral double-J stents. J Endourol. 1993; 7:497–499.
crossref
32. Ecke TH, Bartel P, Hallmann S, Ruttloff J. Evaluation of symptoms and patients' comfort for JJ-ureteral stents with and without antireflux-membrane valve. Urology. 2010; 75:212–216.
crossref
33. Lasaponara F, Catti M, Morabito F, Volpe A, Manassero F, Ferrando U. Use of small calibre JJ ureteral stent with anti-reflux valve in uretero-vesical anastomosis during renal transplantation. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2000; 52:195–199.
TOOLS
Similar articles