Three dimensional analysis of tooth movement using different sizes of NiTi wire on NiTi scissors-bite corrector

Hyun-Ju Jeon; Sun-Hyung Park; Sang-Hyuk Jung; Youn-Sic Chun

doi:10.4041/kjod.2009.39.1.43

Journal List > Korean J Orthod > v.39(1) > 1043611

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Jeon, Park, Jung, and Chun: Three dimensional analysis of tooth movement using different sizes of NiTi wire on NiTi scissors-bite corrector

Original Article

Korean Journal of Orthodontics

Korean Journal of Orthodontics 2009; 39(1): 43-53.

Published online: 28 February 2009

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2009.39.1.43

Three dimensional analysis of tooth movement using different sizes of NiTi wire on NiTi scissors-bite corrector

Hyun-Ju Jeon, DDS^a, Sun-Hyung Park, DDS, MSD, PhD^b, Sang-Hyuk Jung, MD, PhD^c, Youn-Sic Chun, DDS, MSD, PhD^d

^aResident, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Korea.

^bAssistant Professor, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Korea.

^cAssociate Professor, Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Korea.

^dProfessor, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Korea.

Corresponding author: Sun-Hyung Park. Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, 911-1 Mok-dong, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul 158-710, Korea. +82 2 2650 5112; drpark@ewha.ac.kr

Received 1 September 2008 Revised 6 November 2008 Accepted 10 November 2008

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare the difference in three dimensional tooth movement using three different wire sizes (0.018 × 0.025-in, 0.016 × 0.022-in, 0.016-in) on a NiTi scissors-bite corrector.

Methods

Computed tomography (CT) images of the experimental model before and after tooth movement were taken and reconstructed into three dimensional models for superimposition. The direction and the amount of tooth movement were measured and analyzed statistically.

Results

The lingual and intrusive movements of the crown of the maxillary second molar were increased as the size of the NiTi wire increased. The roots of the maxillary second molars moved buccally except for the 0.016-in group. The intrusive movement of the roots of the maxillary second molars was increased as the size of the NiTi wire increased. Due to the use of orthodontic mini-implants, anchorage loss was under 0.2 mm on average.

Conclusions

The 0.018 × 0.025-in NiTi wire was most effective in lingual and intrusive movement of the maxillary second molar which was in scissors-bite position. Indirect skeletal anchorage with a single orthodontic mini-implant was rigid enough to prevent anchorage loss.

Keywords: Scissors-bite, NiTi scissors-bite corrector, Calorific machine, Indirect skeletal anchorage

Figures and Tables

Fig 1

Basic structure of the Calorific machine system.

Fig 2

Dragon Helix and NiTi scissors-bite corrector. A, B, Dragon Helix; C, D, NiTi scissors-bite corrector. The second molar was aligned in line of occlusion and overintruded.

Fig 3

Bonding Procedure of NiTi Scissors-bite corrector. A, Buccal aspect; B, occlusal aspect.

Fig 4

Process of the experiments. A, Before tooth movement; B, after tooth movement; C, forming stl files from dicom files using V-works; D, superimposition and measuring of tooth movement.

Fig 5

Superimposition of experimental models (0.018 × 0.025 in). Blue color shows before tooth movement, and red color, after tooth movement. Red circle was one of the reference markers for superimposition, X axis is the bucco-lingual direction, Y axis is the occluso-gingival direction and Z axis is the mesio-distal direction. A, Buccal aspect; B, distal aspect.

Fig 6

Schematic drawing of superimposition. A, B, 0.018 × 0.025 in group; C, D, 0.016 × 0.022 in group; E, F, 0.016 in group A,C,E in occlusal view; B, D, F in distal view. Green teeth show initial position and purple teeth show final position.

Fig 7

Comparison of mesiolingual cusp displacements of the second molar between 3 groups. X axis, Bucco-lingual direction; Y axis, occluso-gingival direction. ^*, significantly different as p < 0.05 between groups.

Fig 8

Comparison of palatal root displacements of the second molar between 3 groups. ^*, significantly different as p < 0.05 between groups.

Table 1

Comparison of second molar displacement between 3 groups (Mean ± S.D) Unit, mm

X, X axis, bucco-lingual direction; Y, Y axis, occluso-gingival direction Z, Z axis, mesio-distal direction. ^a,b,cGroups with different letters are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05).

Table 2

Comparison of mesiobuccal cusp displacement of first molar between 3 groups (Mean ± S.D)

^*, significantly different at p < 0.05 between groups; NS, not significant.

References

1. Ogihara K, Nakahara R, Koyanagi S, Suda M. Treatment of a Brodie bite by lower lateral expansion: a case report and fourth year follow-up. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1998. 23:17–21.

2. Heikinheimo K, Salmi K, Myllärniemi S. Identification of cases requiring orthodontic treatment. A longitudinal study. Swed Dent J Suppl. 1982. 15:71–77.

3. Thilander B, Wahlund S, Lennartsson B. The effect of early interceptive treatment in children with posterior cross-bite. Eur J Orthod. 1984. 6:25–34.

4. Pirttiniemi P, Kantomaa T. Relation of glenoid fossa morphology to mandibulofacial asymmetry, studied in dry human Lapp skulls. Acta Odontol Scand. 1992. 50:235–243.

5. Kucher G, Weiland FJ. Goal-oriented positioning of upper second molars using the palatal intrusion technique. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996. 110:466–468.

6. Enacar A, Pehlivanoglu M, Akcan CA. Molar intrusion with a palatal arch. J Clin Orthod. 2003. 37:557–559.

7. Nakamura Y, Murata K, Ogino T, Sekiya T, Hirashita A. Intrusion of overerupted upper second molars with a modified lingual arch. J Clin Orthod. 2004. 38:622–626.

8. Legan HL. Orthodontic planning and biomechanics for transverse distraction ostegenesis. Semin Orthod. 2001. 7:160–168.

9. Baeten LR. Canine retraction: a photoelastic study. Am J Orthod. 1975. 67:11–23.

10. Burstone CJ, Pryputniewicz RJ. Holographic determination of centers of rotation produced by orthodontic forces. Am J Orthod. 1980. 77:396–409.

11. Caputo AA, Chaconas SJ, Hayashi RK. Photoelastic visualization of orthodontic forces during canine retraction. Am J Orthod. 1974. 65:250–259.

12. Moss ML, Skalak R, Patel H, Sen K, Moss-Salentijn L, Shinozuka M, et al. Finite element method modeling of craniofacial growth. Am J Orthod. 1985. 87:453–472.

13. Weijs WA, de Jongh HJ. Strain in mandibular alveolar bone during mastication in the rabbit. Arch Oral Biol. 1977. 22:667–675.

14. Ogura M, Yamagata K, Kubota S, Kim JH, Kuroe K, Ito G. Comparison of tooth movements using Friction-Free and preadjusted edgewise bracket systems. J Clin Orthod. 1996. 30:325–330.

15. Drescher D, Bourauel C, Thier M. Application of the orthodontic measurement and simulation system (OMSS) in orthodontics. Eur J Orthod. 1991. 13:169–178.

16. Rhee JN, Chun YS, Row J. A comparison between friction and frictionless mechanics with a new typodont simulation system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001. 119:292–299.

17. Cha BK, Lee JY, Bae SH, Park DI. Preliminary study of future orthodontic model analysis: the orthodontic application of 3-dimensional reverse engineering technologies. J Korean Dent Assoc. 2002. 40:107–107.

18. Yun SW, Lim WH, Chong DR, Chun YS. Scissors-bite correction on second molar with a dragon helix appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007. 132:842–847.

19. Chun YS, Row J, Suh MS, Park IK. An experimental study on the dynamic tooth moving effects of two precision lingual archs(Pla) for correction of posterior scissor bite by the calorific machine. Korean J Orthod. 1998. 28:29–41.

20. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics:. 2007. St.Louis: Mosby;340.

21. Melsen B, Agerbaek N, Eriksen J, Terp S. New attachment through periodontal treatment and orthodontic intrusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988. 94:104–116.

TOOLS

Similar articles