1.Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955. 34:849–53.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
2.Newman GV. Bonding plastic orthodontic attachments to tooth enamel. JNJ Dent Soc. 1964. 35:346–58.
3.Silverman E., Cohen M. Current adhesives for indirect bracket bonding. Am J Orthod. 1974. 65:76–84.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
4.Thomas RG. Indirect bonding: simplicity in action. J Clin Orthod. 1979. 13:93–106.
5.Miles PG. Weyant RJ. A comparison of two indirect bonding adhesives. Angle Orthod. 2005. 75:1019–23.
6.Aguirre MJ., King GJ., Waldron JM. Assessment of bracket placement and bond strength when comparing direct bonding to indirect bonding techniques. Am J Orthod. 1982. 82:269–76.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
7.Hocevar RA., Vincent HF. Indirect versus direct bonding: bond strength and failure location. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988. 94:367–71.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
8.Linn BJ., Berzins DW., Dhuru VB., Bradley TG. A comparison of bond strength between direct- and indirect-bonding methods. Angle Orthod. 2006. 76:289–94.
9.Daub J., Berzins DW., Linn BJ., Bradley TG. Bond strength of direct and indirect bonded brackets after thermocycling. Angle Orthod. 2006. 76:295–300.
10.Arhun N., Arman A., Cehreli SB¸Arıkan S., Karabulut E., Gülşahi K. Microleakage beneath ceramic and metal brackets bonded with a conventional and an antibacterial adhesive system. Angle Orthod. 2006. 76:1028–34.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
11.James JW., Miller BH., English JD., Tadlock LP., Buschang PH. Effects of high-speed curing devices on shear bond strength and microleakage of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003. 123:555–61.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
12.Ulker M., Uysal T., Ramoglu SI., Ertas H. Microleakage under orthodontic brackets using high-intensity curing lights. Angle Orthod. 2009. 79:144–9.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
13.Klocke A., Shi J., Vaziri F., Kahl-Nieke B., Bismayer U. Effect of time on bond strength in indirect bonding. Angle Orthod. 2004. 74:245–50.
14.Klocke A., Tadic D., Vaziri F., Kahl-Nieke B. Custom base pre-aging in indirect bonding. Angle Orthod. 2004. 74:106–11.
15.Sondhi A. Efficient and effective indirect bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999. 115:352–9.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
16.International Organization for Standardization Technical Specification Report (ISO/TS 11405: 2003).
17.Artun J., Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 1984. 85:333–40.
18.Reynolds IR., von Fraunhofer JA. Direct bonding of orthodontic brackets - a comparative study of adhesives. Br J Orthod. 1976. 3:143–6.
19.Polat O., Karaman AI., Buyukyilmaz T. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strengths and in vivo analysis of bond survival of indirect-bonding resins. Angle Orthod. 2004. 74:405–9.
20.Klocke A., Shi J., Kahl-Nieke B., Bismayer U. Bond strength with custom base indirect bonding techniques. Angle Orthod. 2003. 73:176–80.
21.Yi GK., Dunn WJ., Taloumis LJ. Shear bond strength comparison between direct and indirect bonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003. 124:577–81.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
22.Bishara SE., Ajlouni R., Laffoon JF. Effect of thermocycling on the shear bond strength of a cyanoacrylate orthodontic adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003. 123:21–4.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
23.Sinha PK., Nanda RS., Duncanson MG., Hosier MJ. Bond strengths and remnant adhesive resin on debonding for orthodontic bonding techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995. 108:302–7.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
24.Taylor MJ., Lynch E. Microleakage. J Dent. 1992. 20:3–10.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
25.Ramoglu SI., Uysal T., Ulker M., Ertas H. Microleakage under ceramic and metallic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer. Angle Orthod. 2009. 79:138–43.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
26.Gillgrass TJ., Millett DT., Creanor SL., MacKenzie D., Bagg J., Gilmour WH, et al. Fluoride release, microbial inhibition and microleakage pattern of two orthodontic band cements. J Dent. 1999. 27:455–61.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
27.Mehl A., Hickel R., Kunzelmann KH. Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without ‘softstart-polymerization'. J Dent. 1997. 25:321–30.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
28.Ferracane JL., Mitchem JC. Relationship between composite contraction stress and leakage in class V cavities. Am J Dent. 2003. 16:239–43.
30.Burgess JO., DeGoes M., Walker R., Ripps AH. An evaluation of four light-curing units comparing soft and hard curing. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1999. 11:125–32.
31.Oesterle LJ., Newman SM., Shellhart WC. Rapid curing of bonding composite with a xenon plasma arc light. Am J Orthod Dentfacial Orthop. 2001. 119:610–6.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
32.Celiberti P., Lussi A. Use of a self etching adhesive on previously etched intact enamel and its effect on sealant microleakage and tag formation. J Dent. 2005. 33:163–71.
33.Kubo S., Yokota H., Sata Y., Hayashi Y. Microleakage of self etching primers after thermal and flexural load cycling. Am J Dent. 2001. 14:163–9.
34.Arıkan S., Arhun N., Arman A., Cehreli SB. Microleakage beneath ceramic and metal brackets photopolymerized with LED or conventional light curing units. Angle Orthod. 2006. 76:1035–40.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)