Journal List > Korean J Orthod > v.39(6) > 1043608

Choi: Comparison of slim bristled and V-shaped orthodontic toothbrushes in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a slim bristled toothbrush compared with a V-shaped orthodontic toothbrush in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances.

Methods

Thirty four orthodontic patients receiving edgewise treatment were randomly assigned to two groups, a slim bristled toothbrush (Nano silver slim care) and a V-shaped toothbrush (Oral-B). Plaque index, gingival index and bleeding index were recorded at the beginning of the study (baseline), 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 6 weeks after new toothbrushes were supplied and the results were analyzed statistically.

Results

No statistically significant differences were found for plaque index, gingival index and bleeding index between toothbrush groups during the 6 weeks. Plaque and gingival indices were decreased at 2 weeks and 4 weeks but increased at 6 weeks in both toothbrush groups. Bleeding index in the V-shaped toothbrush group showed the lowest value at 2 weeks then increased at 4 weeks and 6 weeks but in the slim bristled toothbrush group decreased from 2 weeks through 6 weeks to under baseline levels. Patients in their twenties had significantly lower values than teenagers in the slim bristled toothbrush group (p < 0.013).

Conclusions

The results would suggest that both of the toothbrushes are equally effective but the use of a slim bristled toothbrush may be of benefit in promoting gingival health for fixed orthodontic appliance patients in their twenties and over.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1
Toothbrushes used in this study. A, V-shaped orthodontic toothbrush; B, Nano-silver composite slim bristled toothbrush.
kjod-39-383-g001
Fig. 2
Orthodontic modification of Plaque index: diagram to show the method for division of the tooth for plaque measurement.
kjod-39-383-g002
Table 1
Distribution of samples by age and type of toothbrush
kjod-39-383-i001

SD, Standard deviation.

Table 2
Indexes
kjod-39-383-i002
Table 3
Change in plaque index between baseline (T0) and new toothbrush (T0-new)
kjod-39-383-i003

SD, Standard deviation; *p < 0.001.

Table 4
Changes of plaque index, gingival index and bleeding index and comparison among the times and between Slim toothbrush group and V-orthodontic toothbrush group
kjod-39-383-i004

T0, at the time before new toothbrush is supplied; T1, 2 weeks; T2, 4 weeks; T3, 6 weeks after new toothbrush is supplied; *p < 0.01; p < 0.001; (T*-T*), significant difference in post hoc tests p < 0.05).

Table 5
Change of periodontal parameters according to the ages and comparison between teenagers and twenties
kjod-39-383-i005

T0, at the time before new toothbrush is supplied; T1, 2 weeks; T2, 4 weeks; T3, 6 weeks after new toothbrush is supplied; *p < 0.013, significant differences with one another by Bonferroni correction; (T*-T*) in among the times, significant differences in post hoc tests (p < 0.05); NS, not significant.

References

1. Loe H, Theilade E, Jensen SB. Experimental gingivitis in man. J Periodontol. 1965. 36:177–187.
crossref
2. Lindhe J, Hamp SE, Löe H. Plaque induced periodontal disease in beagle dogs. A 4-year clinical, roentgenographical and histometrical study. J Periodontal Res. 1975. 10:243–255.
3. Suomi JD, Doyle J. Oral hygiene and periodontal disease in an adult population in the United States. J Periodontol. 1972. 43:677–681.
crossref
4. Zachrisson BU. Cause and prevention of injuries to teeth and supporting structures during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1976. 69:285–300.
crossref
5. Lundström F, Hamp SE. Effect of oral hygiene education on children with and without subsequent orthodontic treatment. Scand J Dent Res. 1980. 88:53–59.
crossref
6. Boyd RL. Longitudinal evaluation of a system for self-monitoring plaque control effectiveness in orthodontic patients. J Clin Periodontol. 1983. 10:380–388.
crossref
7. Hussein EA, Acar A, Dogan AA, Kadir T, Caldemir S, Erverdif N. Investigation of bacteremia after toothbrushing in orthodontic patients. Korean J Orthod. 2009. 39:177–184.
crossref
8. Yu JK, Ahn SJ, Lee SJ, Chang YI. Quantitative analysis of mutans streptococci adhesion to various orthodontic bracket materials in vivo. Korean J Orthod. 2009. 39:105–111.
crossref
9. Zachrisson S, Zachrisson BU. Gingival condition associated with orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 1972. 42:26–34.
10. Diamanti-Kipioti A, Gusberti FA, Lang NP. Clinical and microbiological effects of fixed orthodontic appliances. J Clin Periodontol. 1987. 14:326–333.
crossref
11. Atack NE, Sandy JR, Addy M. Periodontal and microbiological changes associated with the placement of orthodontic appliances. A review. J Periodontol. 1996. 67:78–85.
crossref
12. Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ. Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod. 1982. 81:93–98.
crossref
13. Mitchell L. Decalcification during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances--an overview. Br J Orthod. 1992. 19:199–205.
crossref
14. Finkelstein P, Grossman E. The clinical quantitative assessment of the mechanical cleaning efficiency of toothbrushes. Clin Prev Dent. 1984. 6:7–12.
15. De La Rosa M, Zacarias Guerra J, Johnston DA, Radike AW. Plaque growth and removal with daily toothbrushing. J Periodontol. 1979. 50:661–664.
crossref
16. Kilicoglu H, Yildirim M, Polater H. Comparison of the effectiveness of two types of toothbrushes on the oral hygiene of patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997. 111:591–594.
crossref
17. Rafe Z, Vardimon A, Ashkenazi M. Comparative study of 3 types of toothbrushes in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006. 130:92–95.
crossref
18. Boyd RL, Murray P, Robertson PB. Effect of rotary electric toothbrush versus manual toothbrush on periodontal status during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989. 96:342–347.
crossref
19. Wilcoxon DB, Ackerman RJ Jr, Killoy WJ, Love JW, Sakumura JS, Tira DE. The effectiveness of a counterrotational-action power toothbrush on plaque control in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991. 99:7–14.
crossref
20. Trimpeneers LM, Wijgaerts IA, Grognard NA, Dermaut LR, Adriaens PA. Effect of electric toothbrushes versus manual toothbrushes on removal of plaque and periodontal status during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997. 111:492–497.
crossref
21. Ho HP, Niederman R. Effectiveness of the Sonicare sonic toothbrush on reduction of plaque, gingivitis, probing pocket depth and subgingival bacteria in adolescent orthodontic patients. J Clin Dent. 1997. 8:15–19.
22. Clerehugh V, Williams P, Shaw WC, Worthington HV, Warren P. A practice-based randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of an electric and a manual toothbrush on gingival health in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. J Dent. 1998. 26:633–639.
crossref
23. Park CH, Hwang HS, Lee KH, Hong SJ. A comparative study of electric and manual toothbrushes on oral hygiene status in fixed orthodontic patients. Korean J Orthod. 2004. 34:363–370.
24. Park SJ, Lee KH, Hwang HS. Comparison of electric and manual toothbrushes on periodontal health in fixed orthodontic patients. Korean J Orthod. 2005. 35:286–294.
25. Cha KS. Research on plaque removal by sonic toothbrush for patients with a fixed orthodontic appliance. Korean J Orthod. 2004. 34:189–195.
26. Jackson CL. Comparison between electric toothbrushing and manual toothbrushing, with and without oral irrigation, for oral hygiene of orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991. 99:15–20.
crossref
27. Heasman P, Wilson Z, Macgregor I, Kelly P. Comparative study of electric and manual toothbrushes in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998. 114:45–49.
crossref
28. Hickman J, Millett DT, Sander L, Brown E, Love J. Powered vs manual toothbrushing in fixed appliance patients: a short term randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthod. 2002. 72:135–140.
29. Womack WR, Guay AH. Comparative cleansing efficiency of an electric and a manual toothbrush in orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod. 1968. 38:256–267.
30. Kaklamanos EG, Kalfas S. Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of powered toothbrushes for orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008. 133:187.e1–187.e14.
crossref
31. Wilkins EM. Wilkins EM, McCullough PA, editors. Periodontal and dental indices. Clinical practice of the dental hygienist. 1976. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger;273–283.
32. Lobene RR, Weatherford T, Ross NM, Lamm RA, Menaker L. A modified gingival index for use in clinical trials. Clin Prev Dent. 1986. 8:3–6.
33. Thienpont V, Dermaut LR, Van Maele G. Comparative study of 2 electric and 2 manual toothbrushes in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001. 120:353–360.
crossref
34. Hwang CJ. Analysis of characteristics of medical accidents and disputes in orthodontic area. Korean J Orthod. 1999. 29:1–15.
35. Heintze SD, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Finke C, Miethke RR. Oral health for the orthodontic patient. 1999. Hong Kong: Quintessence Publishing;65–87.
36. Gettinger G, Petters MR, Testa MA, Löe H, Anerud A, Boysen H, et al. The use of six selected teeth in population measures of periodontal status. J Periodontol. 1983. 54:155–159.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles