Journal List > J Korean Foot Ankle Soc > v.21(1) > 1043438

Bang, Bae, Woo, and Chung: Tricortical-allobone Grafting in Screw Fixation for Intra-articular Calcaneal Fracture via Ollier Approach

Abstract

Purpose:

Bone grafting is often necessary to maintain a reduction and prevent delayed collapse of reduced fracture in a treatment of severely displaced comminuted intra-articular calcaneal fractures. Herein, we analyzed the usefulness and necessary conditions to perform tricortical-allobone grafting in open reduction of calcaneal fracture via the Ollier approach.

Materials and Methods:

We performed a retrospective review of 57 intra-articular calcaneal fractures that underwent an operation via the Ollier approach between April 2009 and April 2015. They were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n=17) included those with tricor-tical-allobone grafts underneath the posterior facet fragment, and group 2 (n=40) included cases without a bone graft. We measured the Böhler angle, Gissane angle, height, and width of the calcaneus at preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up radiograph. We measured the sagittal rotational angle of the posterior facet fragment of preoperative computed tomography to analyze the effect and necessary conditions for bone grafting. We also reviewed the clinical results by the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale, visual analogue scale (VAS), and any complications.

Results:

According to the Sanders classification, there were 3 type-II fractures, 12 type-III fractures, and 2 type-IV fractures in Group 1; whereas in Group 2, there were 26 type-II fractures, 13 type-III fractures, and 1 type-IV fracture (p=0.002). Regarding the preoperative radiologic parameters, there were significant differences in the Böhler angle (p=0.006), Gissane angle (p=0.043), and rotational angle of the posterior facet fragment (p=0.001). No significant difference was observed in the preoperative calcaneal height and width, as well as postoperative radiologic parameters. There was no significant clinical difference between the two groups (p=0.546).

Conclusion:

We suggest that a tricortical-allobone graft may be useful in open reduction and screw fixation via the Ollier approach for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fracture with a bony defect after reduction of collapsed posterior facet fragment. This graft can contribute to the stable reduction via a small approach, even without a plate.

REFERENCES

1.Choi JC., Lee KS., Kim BS., Park BY., Cha JH. Open reduction and internal fixation of intraarticular calcaneal fractures by the extended lateral approach. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 1997. 32:370–5.
crossref
2.Jiang SD., Jiang LS., Dai LY. Surgical treatment of calcaneal fractures with use of beta-tricalcium phosphate ceramic grafting. Foot Ankle Int. 2008. 29:1015–9.
3.Goulet JA., Senunas LE., DeSilva GL., Greenfield ML. Autogenous iliac crest bone graft. Complications and functional assessment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997. 339:76–81.
crossref
4.Xia S., Lu Y., Wang H., Wu Z., Wang Z. Open reduction and internal fixation with conventional plate via L-shaped lateral approach versus internal fixation with percutaneous plate via a sinus tarsi approach for calcaneal fractures: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg. 2014. 12:475–80.
5.Bae SY., Shin YK., Kim JO., Lee JH., Lee CW., Shin JH. Evaluation of rotational displacement of the posterior facet on the sagittal plane in computed tomographic images of calcaneal fractures. J Korean Fract Soc. 2005. 18:165–9.
crossref
6.Kim KW., Cho SG., Lee DY. Treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fracture using ollier approach. J Korean Foot Ankle Soc. 2008. 12:174–9.
7.Loucks C., Buckley R. Bohler’s angle: correlation with outcome in displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1999. 13:554–8.
crossref
8.Leung KS., Chan WS., Shen WY., Pak PP., So WS., Leung PC. Operative treatment of intraarticular fractures of the os calcis--the role of rigid internal fixation and primary bone grafting: preliminary results. J Orthop Trauma. 1989. 3:232–40.
9.Leung KS., Yuen KM., Chan WS. Operative treatment of displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneum. Medium-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993. 75:196–201.
crossref
10.Huang PJ., Huang HT., Chen TB., Chen JC., Lin YK., Cheng YM, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus. J Trauma. 2002. 52:946–50.
crossref
111.Thornes BS., Collins AL., Timlin M., Corrigan J. Outcome of cal-caneal fractures treated operatively and non-operatively. the effect of litigation on outcomes. Ir J Med Sci. 2002. 171:155–7.
crossref
12.Sanders R., Fortin P., DiPasquale T., Walling A. Operative treatment in 120 displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures. Results using a prognostic computed tomography scan classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993. 290:87–95.
13.Stephenson JR. Treatment of displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus using medial and lateral approaches, internal fixation, and early motion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987. 69:115–30.
crossref
14.Letournel E. Open treatment of acute calcaneal fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993. 290:60–7.
crossref
15.Sanders R. Displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000. 82:225–50.
crossref
16.Schnee CL., Freese A., Weil RJ., Marcotte PJ. Analysis of harvest morbidity and radiographic outcome using autograft for anterior cervical fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997. 22:2222–7.
crossref

Figure 1.
Fixation with screws and grafting with tricortical-allobone. Lateral view (A) and axial view (B) of radiographs.
jkfas-21-27f1.tif
Figure 2.
Posterior facet fragment rotation angle.
jkfas-21-27f2.tif
Figure 3.
Tricortical-allobone graft.
jkfas-21-27f3.tif
Table 1.
Operative Information on the Patients in the Two Groups
General information Group 1 (n=17) Group 2 (n=40) p-value
Sex 0.002
Male 9 (52.9) 36 (90.0)
Female 8 (47.1) 4 (10.0)
Age (yr) 54.2±10.8 52.6±14.5 0.118
Affected side (%) 0.707
Right 9 (52.9) 19 (47.5)
Left 8 (47.1) 21 (52.5)
Injury mechanism 0.720
Fall down 11 (64.7) 30 (75.0)
Slip down 5 (29.4) 8 (20.0)
Traffic accident 1 (5.9) 2 (5.0)
Essex-Lopresti classification 0.313
Tongue 5 (29.4) 7 (17.5)
Joint depression 12 (70.6) 33 (82.5)
Sanders classification 0.002
Type IIA 1 (5.9) 18 (45.0)
Type IIB 1 (5.9) 7 (17.5)
Type IIC 1 (5.9) 1 (2.5)
Type IIIAB 6 (35.3) 12 (30.0)
Type IIIAC 6 (35.3) 1 (2.5)
Type IIIBC 0 0
Type IV 2 (11.8) 1 (2.5)
Time from injury to operation (day) 3.5±4.6 2.8±2.6 0.134
Follow-up periods (mo) 9.2±7.6 12.5±9.3 0.198

Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard deviation. Group 1: using tricortical-allobone graft, Group 2: not using tricortical-allobone graft.

Table 2.
Preoperative, Immediate Postoperative, Final Follow-up Radiologic Measurements
Parameter Group 1 (n=17) Group 2 (n=40) p-value
Böhler angle (°)
Preoperative 1.5±10.2 9.7±9.7 0.006
Postoperative 20.8±6.3 22.5±6.0 0.324
Final 16.4±9.8 20.9±6.9 0.056
Gissane angle (°) Preoperative 117.4±17.5 107.6±10.9 0.043
Postoperative 106.5±13.3 102.9±8.3 0.209
Final 110.1±14.5 106.0±9.1 0.296
Calcaneal height (mm)
Preoperative 42.6±4.7 45.9±3.5 0.065
Postoperative 45.5±4.3 48.3±3.4 0.132
Final 44.4±3.3 47.2±3.8 0.191
Calcaneal width (mm)
Preoperative 47.6±4.7 46.2±5.0 0.324
Postoperative 42.2±4.4 41.6±3.4 0.607
Final 42.4±3.9 41.5±3.8 0.438
Preoperative posterior facet fragment rotation angle (°)
Preoperative 29.3±13.4 10.9±9.8 0.001

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. Group 1: using tricortical-allobone graft, Group 2: not using tricortical-allobone graft.

Table 3.
Clinical Results at Final Follow-up
Assessment Group 1 (n=17) Group 2 (n=40) p-value
AOFAS scale 87.3±9.4 86.7±8.8 0.546
VAS score 2.2±1.2 2.1±1.4 0.576

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. Group 1: using tricortical-allobone graft, Group 2: not using tricortical-allobone graft. AOFAS: American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, VAS: visual analogue scale.

TOOLS
Similar articles