Journal List > J Korean Foot Ankle Soc > v.21(4) > 1043429

Lee, Ahn, Nam, Lee, Lee, Kim, and Lee: Results of Autologous Osteochondral Transplantation of the Ostochondral Lesion on the Talus: A Comparison Study between Medial Malleolar Osteotomy Approach and Anterior Arthrotomy Approach

Abstract

Purpose:

Osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT) has traditionally been treated using an autologous osteochondral graft via the medial malleolar approach. Here, we compare the traditional method with the anterior arthrotomy approach.

Materials and Methods:

Between January 2005 and June 2015, 24 cases of patients who received autologus osteochondral graft for OLT and with at least 2 years of follow-up were evaluated. They were divided into two groups; one group receiving autologous osteochondral graft via the medial malleolar osteotomy approach (group 1, n=9) and another group via the anterior arthrotomy approach (group 2, n=15). The clinical outcomes were assessed using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score.

Results:

In all cases, the size of the subchondral cyst of the talus decreased, if not disappeared on the final follow-up radiograph. All osteochondral grafts were united. The mean AOFAS score increased from 61.5 preoperatively to 84.9 at the final follow-up. The mean AOFAS score of group 1 increased from 60.3 preoperatively to 78.0 (p=0.007) at the final follow-up, and the mean AOFAS score of group 2 also increased from 62.2 to 89.1 (p=0.006). The AOFAS score was statistically better in group 2 than in group 1 (p=0.034) at the final follow-up.

Conclusion:

Autologous osteochondral graft of the OLT yields satisfactory radiologic and clinical outcomes. Especially, better clinical outcome was observed in the group using the anterior arthrotomy approach (group 2) than in the group using the medial malleolar osteotomy approach (group 1).

REFERENCES

11.Berlet GC., Mascia A., Miniaci A. Treatment of unstable osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the knee using autogenous osteochondral grafts (mosaicplasty)1 Arthroscopy1. 1999. 15:312–61.
21.Brage ME., Bugbee W., Tontz W. Intraoperative and postoperative complications of fresh tibiotalar allografting1 Paper presented at: the annual Winter Meeting of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS). 2002. Feb 16; Dallas, TX, USA1.
31.Browne JE., Branch TP. Surgical alternatives for treatment of articular cartilage lesions1 J Am Acad Orthop Surg1. 2000. 8:180–91.
41.Buckwalter JA., Lohmander S. Operative treatment of osteoar-throsis1 Current practice and future development1 J Bone Joint Surg Am1. 1994. 76:1405–181.
51.Chang E., Lenczner E. Osteochondritis dissecans of the talar dome treated with an osteochondral autograft1 Can J Surg1. 2000. 43:217–211.
61.Hepple S., Winson IG., Glew D. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: a revised classification1 Foot Ankle Int1. 1999. 20:789–931.
71.Kelbérine F., Frank A. Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talar dome: a retrospective study of 48 cases1 Ar-throscopy1. 1999. 15:77–841.
81.Kumai T., Takakura Y., Higashiyama I., Tamai S. Arthroscopic drilling for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus1 J Bone Joint Surg Am1. 1999. 81:1229–351.
91.Schenck RC Jr., Goodnight JM. Osteochondritis dissecans1 J Bone Joint Surg Am1. 1996. 78:439–561.
101.Taranow WS., Bisignani GA., Towers JD., Conti SF. Retrograde drilling of osteochondral lesions of the medial talar dome1 Foot Ankle Int1. 1999. 20:474–801.
111.Brittberg M., Lindahl A., Nilsson A., Ohlsson C., Isaksson O., Peterson L. Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation1 N Engl J Med1. 1994. 331:889–951.
121.Giannini S., Buda R., Grigolo B., Vannini F. Autologous chondrocyte transplantation in osteochondral lesions of the ankle joint1 Foot Ankle Int1. 2001. 22:513–71.
131.Berndt AL., Harty M. Transchondral fractures (osteochondritis dissecans) of the talus1 J Bone Joint Surg Am1. 1959. 41:988–10201.
141.Yamashita F., Sakakida K., Suzu F., Takai S. The transplantation of an autogeneic osteochondral fragment for osteochondritis dissecans of the knee1 Clin Orthop Relat Res1. 1985. 201:43–501.
151.Hangody L., Kish G., Módis L., Szerb I., Gáspár L., Diószegi Z, et al. Mosaicplasty for the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the talus: two to seven year results in 36 patients1 Foot Ankle Int1. 2001. 22:552–81.
161.Outerbridge HK., Outerbridge AR., Outerbridge RE. The use of a lateral patellar autologous graft for the repair of a large osteochondral defect in the knee1 J Bone Joint Surg Am1. 1995. 77:65–721.
171.Sandlin MI., Charlton TP., Taghavi CE., Giza E. Management of osteochondral lesions of the talus1 Instr Course Lect1. 2017. 66:293–91.
181.Savage-Elliott I., Ross KA., Smyth NA., Murawski CD., Kennedy JG. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: a current concepts review and evidence-based treatment paradigm1 Foot Ankle Spec1. 2014. 7:414–221.
191.Tol JL., Struijs PA., Bossuyt PM., Verhagen RA., van Dijk CN. Treatment strategies in osteochondral defects of the talar dome: a systematic review1 Foot Ankle Int1. 2000. 21:119–261.
201.Reddy S., Pedowitz DI., Parekh SG., Sennett BJ., Okereke E. The morbidity associated with osteochondral harvest from asymptomatic knees for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus1 Am J Sports Med1. 2007. 35:80–51.
211.Flick AB., Gould N. Osteochondritis dissecans of the talus (transchondral fractures of the talus): review of the literature and new surgical approach for medial dome lesions1 Foot Ankle1. 1985. 5:165–851.
221.Muir D., Saltzman CL., Tochigi Y., Amendola N. Talar dome access for osteochondral lesions1 Am J Sports Med1. 2006. 34:1457–631.
231.Young KW., Deland JT., Lee KT., Lee YK. Medial approaches to osteochondral lesion of the talus without medial malleolar oste-otomy1 Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc1. 2010. 18:634–71.
241.Draper SD., Fallat LM. Autogenous bone grafting for the treatment of talar dome lesions1 J Foot Ankle Surg1. 2000. 39:15–231.
251.Marcacci M., Kon E., Zaffagnini S., Visani A. Use of autologous grafts for reconstruction of osteochondral defects of the knee1 Orthopedics1. 1999. 22:595–6001.
261.Sammarco GJ., Makwana NK. Treatment of talar osteochondral lesions using local osteochondral graft1 Foot Ankle Int1. 2002. 23:693–81.
271.Lee M., Kwon JW., Choi WJ., Lee JW. Comparison of outcomes for osteochondral lesions of the talus with and without chronic lateral ankle instability1 Foot Ankle Int1. 2015. 36:1050–71.

Figure 1.
A case with medial malleolar osteotomy approach in group 1. (A, B) T2-weighted coronal and sagittal magnetic resonance images show medial osteochondral lesion with subchondral cyst. (C) Osteochondral lesion of talus after medial malleolar osteotomy. (D) Osteochondral autograft was transplanted into the lesion. (E) Final radiograph shows loss of subchondral cyst and union of graft and osteotomy site.
jkfas-21-139f1.tif
Figure 2.
A case with anterior arthrotomy approach in group 2. (A) T2-weighted coronal magnetic resonance image shows medial osteochondral lesion with subchondral cyst. (B) Sagittal image shows cystic lesion within 15。 posterior of talar dome apex. (C) Osteochondral lesion of talus after anterior arthrotomy approach. (D) Osteochondral autograft was transplanting into the lesion with 90。 to the articular surface. (E) Final radiograph shows loss of subchondral cyst and good union of osteochondral graft.
jkfas-21-139f2.tif
Table 1.
Patient Characteristics, Radiographic Findings and Clinical Outcomes
Case no. Sex/age (yr) Trauma history Diagnosis B&H stage Hepple stage Lesion site Lesion size (mm) With osteotmy With MBO AOFAS-preop AOFAS-last ROM-DF (。)
1 F/50 N OLT, CLAI 3 4 M 6×5 N Y 58 88 10
2 F/57 Y OLT, CLAI 4 5 M 6×6 Y Y 65 81 12
3 F/51 Y OLT, CLAI 4 5 M 8×6 Y Y 63 85 12
4 M/59 Y OLT 4 4 M 8×6 N Y 52 83 10
5 M/53 Y OLT 4 4 M, L M: 8×5, L: 6×4 N N 60 88 10
6 F/53 Y OLT, CLAI 4 5 L 8×5 N Y 72 96 10
7 F/59 N OLT 3 3 M 10×6 Y N 67 80 8
8 M/25 Y OLT 3 3 M 10×8 Y N 61 79 8
9 F/54 Y OLT 3 5 M 8×6 Y N 55 65 5
10 M/57 Y OLT 4 4 L 10×7 N N 68 92 10
11 M/58 Y OLT 3 4 M 8×7 Y N 62 79 8
12 M/26 N OLT 3 3 L 9×6 N N 64 89 12
13 M/35 Y OLT, CLAI 4 5 L 9×5 N Y 68 91 15
14 M/41 Y OLT 4 4 M 10×6 N N 62 83 10
15 M/37 Y OLT 3 3 L 12×8 N N 57 89 15
16 M/36 Y OLT, CLAI 4 5 M 8×6 Y Y 59 82 10
17 M/37 Y OLT 3 4 M 10×6 N N 60 88 10
18 M/50 Y OLT, CLAI 4 5 M 8×8 Y Y 57 78 8
19 M/42 Y OLT 3 3 M 10×7 N N 62 90 15
20 F/38 Y OLT 3 3 L 8×8 N N 52 87 10
21 F/45 N OLT, CLAI 4 5 M 8×6 Y Y 54 73 7
22 F/42 Y OLT 3 4 L 10×8 N N 70 88 12
23 F/47 Y OLT, CLAI 4 5 L 10×6 N Y 60 90 15
24 F/42 N OLT 4 5 M 11×7 N N 68 94 14

F: female, M: male (sex), N: no, Y: yes, OLT: osteochondral lesion of talus, CLAI: chronic lateral ankle instrability, B&H: Berndt and Harty, M: medial (lesion site), L: lateral, MBO: modified Broström operation, AOFAS: American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, preop: preoperative, ROM-DF: range of motion dorsiflexion.

TOOLS
Similar articles