Journal List > J Korean Foot Ankle Soc > v.20(1) > 1043401

Kim and Lee: Outcomes of Ankle Arthroplasty with Preoperative Varus Deformity of More Than 20 Degrees: Comparison with the Group of Varus Deformity of Less Than 20 Degrees

Abstract

Purpose

We compared the results of total ankle arthroplasty in patients with preoperative varus deformity of more than 20o with those of patients with varus deformity less than 20o.

Materials and Methods

From January 2005 to January 2013, 9 ankles with preoperative varus deformity of more than 20o (varus group) and 31 ankles with varus deformity less than 20o (control group) underwent total ankle arthroplasty. Clinical results were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and radiographic results were assessed using tibiotalar varus angle in standing anteroposterior radiographs taken preoperatively and at the last follow-up.

Results

The mean duration of clinical follow-up was 42.8 months (14∼60 months). The AOFAS score was improved by a mean 47.0 points in the varus group and 37.6 points in the control group. Statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups (p=0.041). Tibiotalar varus angle measured at the last follow-up radiograph was 2.5o in the varus group and 1.0o in the control group and the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.820).

Conclusion

Satisfactory clinical and radiographic results can be achieved in patients with varus deformity more than 20o by precise bone resection and soft tissue release.

References

1. Thomas RH, Daniels TR. Ankle arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85:923–36.
crossref
2. Knecht SI, Estin M, Callaghan JJ, Zimmerman MB, Alliman KJ, Alvine FG, et al. The Agility total ankle arthroplasty. Seven to sixteen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86:1161–71.
3. Greisberg J, Hansen ST Jr. Ankle replacement: management of associated deformities. Foot Ankle Clin. 2002; 7:721–36.
crossref
4. Hintermann B, Valderrabano V. Total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Clin. 2003; 8:375–405.
crossref
5. Haskell A, Mann RA. Ankle arthroplasty with preoperative coronal plane deformity: short-term results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 424:98–103.
6. Wood PL, Deakin S. Total ankle replacement. The results in 200 ankles. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003; 85:334–41.
7. Valderrabano V, Pagenstert G, Hintermann B. Total ankle replacement: three component prosthesis. Tech Foot Ankle Surg. 2005; 4:42–54.
8. Hobson SA, Karantana A, Dhar S. Total ankle replacement in patients with significant preoperative deformity of the hindfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91:481–6.
crossref
9. Kim BS, Choi WJ, Kim YS, Lee JW. Total ankle replacement in moderate to severe varus deformity of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91:1183–90.
crossref
10. Martin DE, Kaplan PA, Kahler DM, Dussault R, Randolph BJ. Retrospective evaluation of graded stress examination of the ankle. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; 328:165–70.
crossref
11. Stauffer RN, Segal NM. Total ankle arthroplasty: four years' experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981; 160:217–21.
12. Newton SE 3rd. Total ankle arthroplasty. Clinical study of fifty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982; 64:104–11.
crossref
13. Trajkovski T, Pinsker E, Cadden A, Daniels T. Outcomes of ankle arthroplasty with preoperative coronal-plane varus deformity of 10° or greater. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95:1382–8.
crossref
14. Valderrabano V, Pagenstert G, Horisberger M, Knupp M, Hintermann B. Sports and recreation activity of ankle arthritis patients before and after total ankle replacement. Am J Sports Med. 2006; 34:993–9.
crossref
15. Kim BS, Knupp M, Zwicky L, Lee JW, Hintermann B. Total ankle replacement in association with hindfoot fusion: outcome and complications. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010; 92:1540–7.

Figure 1.
Standing anteroposterior radiograph shows the measurement of ankle alignment which is defined as the angle between the anatomical axis of the tibia and a line drawn perpendicular to the talar dome (angle A). The extent of varus deformity in this case is 26o.
jkfas-20-19f1.tif
Figure 2.
Standing anteroposterior radiographs before and 44 months after total ankle arthroplasty. (A) Preoperative radiograph shows varus deformity of 28° in a 73-year-old man with post-traumatic arthritis. (B) The patient is satisfied and has a postoperative varus of 2° and an American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score of 88.
jkfas-20-19f2.tif
Table 1.
Patient Demographics
Variable Group I Group II p-value
No. of patients (%) 9 (22.5) 31 (77.5)
Sex (male:female) 4:5 17:14 0.431
Age at surgery (yr) 66.8±9.3 64.7±12.8 0.679
Body mass index (kg/m2) 25.3±3.1 23.9±2.6 0.571
Follow-up period (mo) 46.2±19.9 41.2±24.4 0.322

Values are presented as number (%), ratio, or mean±standard deviation.

Group I: varus group, preoperative tibiotalar varus deformity ≥20o, Group II: control group, preoperative tibiotalar varus deformity <20o.

Table 2.
Distribution of Implants in Varus Group and Control Group
Implant Group I Group II Total
Hintegra (Newdeal SA) 7 (77.7) 24 (77.4) 31 (77.5)
Mobility (Depuy) 2 (22.2) 7 (22.6) 9 (22.2)
Total 9 31 40

Values are presented as number (%) or number only.

Group I: varus group, preoperative tibiotalar varus deformity ≥20o, Group II: control group, preoperative tibiotalar varus deformity <20o.

Table 3.
Clinical Results by AOFAS Score
AOFAS score Group I Group II p-value
Preoperative 33.3±4.5 43.0±6.1 0.323
Last follow-up 80.3±6.7 80.6±6.5 0.901
Improvement 47.0±2.4 37.6±5.6 0.041

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

Group I: varus group, preoperative tibiotalar varus deformity ≥20o, Group II: control group, preoperative tibiotalar varus deformity <20o.

AOFAS: American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society.

Table 4.
Radiographic Results
Varus angle (o) Group I Group II p-value
Preoperative 23.9±2.8 7.8±3.1 0.038
Last follow-up 2.5±1.2 1.0±0.8 0.820

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

Group I: varus group, preoperative tibiotalar varus deformity ≥20o, Group II: control group, preoperative tibiotalar varus deformity <20o.

Table 5.
Complications
Complication Group I Group II
Medial malleolus fracture 1 (11.1) 2 (6.5)
Superficial wound infection 0 (0.0) 1 (3.2)
Total 1 (11.1) 3 (9.7)

Values are presented as number (%).

Group I: varus group, preoperative tibiotalar varus deformity ≥20o, Group II: control group, preoperative tibiotalar varus deformity <20o.

TOOLS
Similar articles