Journal List > J Korean Foot Ankle Soc > v.18(4) > 1043320

Song, Kim, Ahn, Kang, Kim, Kim, and Yoo: Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Using Retrograde Compressive Intramedullary Nail

Abstract

Purpose:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiological and clinical outcomes of tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using retrograde compressive intramedullary nail for patients with complex hindfoot problems, including Charcot arthropathy, osteonecrosis of talus, combined arthritis of the ankle and subtalar joint, failure of previous ankle arthrodesis, and failed total ankle arthroplasty.

Materials and Methods:

Eighteen consecutive patients (10 men and 8 women) with an average age of 54 years (range, 42∼72 years) underwent tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using retrograde compressive intramedullary nail fixation. The mean duration of follow-up was 16 months (range, 12∼23 months). Radiological evaluation included assessment of the union status of ankle and subtalar joints. Clinical evaluations included visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and patient satisfaction, and postoperative complications were analyzed.

Results:

Radiological union was achieved in 14 ankle joints (77%) and 16 subtalar joints (88%) at an average of 16 weeks (range, 14∼40 weeks) and 14 weeks (range, 12∼24 weeks), respectively. The preoperative VAS were 4.6 (range, 4∼8) at rest and 8.2 (range, 7∼10) during walking, and the postoperative VAS were 2.2 (range, 0∼3) and 4.6 (range, 4∼6), respectively (p<0.05). There were 6 nonunions (4 ankle joints and 2 subtalar joints), 3 tibia fractures, 2 delayed union of ankle joints, and 2 breakage of the implant.

Conclusion:

Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using retrograde compressive intramedullary nail may be considered as a viable option in patients with complex hindfoot problems.

REFERENCES

1.Treppo S., Koepp H., Quan EC., Cole AA., Kuettner KE., Grodzin-sky AJ. Comparison of biomechanical and biochemical properties of cartilage from human knee and ankle pairs. J Orthop Res. 2000. 18:739–48.
crossref
2.Cole AA., Margulis A., Kuettner KE. Distinguishing ankle and knee articular cartilage. Foot Ankle Clin. 2003. 8:305–16.
crossref
3.Acosta R., Ushiba J., Cracchiolo A 3rd. The results of a primary and staged pantalar arthrodesis and tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis in adult patients. Foot Ankle Int. 2000. 21:182–94.
crossref
4.Cooper PS. Complications of ankle and tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001. 391:33–44.
crossref
5.Hanson TW., Cracchiolo A 3rd. The use of a 95 degree blade plate and a posterior approach to achieve tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2002. 23:704–10.
6.Millett PJ., O’Malley MJ., Tolo ET., Gallina J., Fealy S., Helfet DL. Tibiotalocalcaneal fusion with a retrograde intramedullary nail: clinical and functional outcomes. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2002. 31:531–6.
7.Mueckley TM., Eichorn S., von Oldenburg G., Speitling A., DiCicco JD 3rd., Hofmann GO, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of primary stiffness of tibiotalar arthrodesis with an intramedullary compression nail and four other fixation devices. Foot Ankle Int. 2006. 27:814–20.
crossref
8.Holt ES., Hansen ST., Mayo KA., Sangeorzan BJ. Ankle arthrodesis using internal screw fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991. 268:21–8.
9.Morgan CD., Henke JA., Bailey RW., Kaufer H. Long-term results of tibiotalar arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985. 67:546–50.
crossref
10.Papa J., Myerson M., Girard P. Salvage, with arthrodesis, in intractable diabetic neuropathic arthropathy of the foot and ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993. 75:1056–66.
crossref
11.Papa JA., Myerson MS. Pantalar and tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis for post-traumatic osteoarthrosis of the ankle and hindfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992. 74:1042–9.
crossref
12.Quill GE. The use of a second-generation intramedullary nail in the fixation of difficult ankle and hind foot arthrodesis. Am J Orthop. 1999. 1:23–31.
13.Mückley T., Klos K., Drechsel T., Beimel C., Gras F., Hofmann GO. Short-term outcome of retrograde tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a curved intramedullary nail. Foot Ankle Int. 2011. 32:47–56.
crossref
14.Noonan T., Pinzur M., Paxinos O., Havey R., Patwardhin A. Tibio-talocalcaneal arthrodesis with a retrograde intramedullary nail: a biomechanical analysis of the effect of nail length. Foot Ankle Int. 2005. 26:304–8.
crossref

Figure 1.
This photograph shows lateral (A), posterior (B), and distal oblique (C) views of retrograde compressive intramedullary nail. The talar locking screw with talar compression cap (arrow) is offered for the compression of ankle joint, and calcaneal locking screw with calcaneal compression cap (arrowhead) is offered for the compression of subtalar joint.
jkfas-18-202f1.tif
Figure 2.
The standing anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) radiographs of right ankle of a 62-year-old man showing severe osteoarthritic changes in the joint with hindfoot varus deformity. The anteroposterior (C) and lateral (D) radiographs of right ankle at postoperative 12 months show complete union of the joints.
jkfas-18-202f2.tif
Figure 3.
(A) Immediate postoperative anteroposterior radiograph of a 57-year-old female demonstrating cortical breakage at the tip of the rod. (B, C) Anteroposterior and lateral radiograph at postoperative 28 weeks show ankle and subtalar joint fusion and cortical hypertrophy at the tip of the rod.
jkfas-18-202f3.tif
Figure 4.
(A) Anteroposterior radiograph of a 70-year-old female at 6 months postoperatively demonstrating breakage of the implant (arrow). (B) Anteroposterior radiograph after revision surgery with plate and screws following nail removal.
jkfas-18-202f4.tif
Table 1.
Indications of Tibiotalocalcaneal Fusion
Diagnosis Number of patients
Posttraumatic arthritis 5
Previous fusion failure 4
Charcot arthropathy 3
Primary arthrosis with hindfoot deformity 3
Secondary arthrosis with talus avascular necrosis 2
Failure after total ankle arthroplasty 1
Table 2.
Preoperative and Postoperative Visual Analogue Scale
Preoperative Postoperative 12 mo p-value*
Resting 4.6 (4∼8) 2.2 (0∼3) 0.024
Walking 8.2 (7∼10) 4.6 (4∼6) 0.037

Values are presented as mean (range).

* Paired t-test.

TOOLS
Similar articles