PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Abstract
In general, medical school faculty have to perform clinical practice in addition to their educational and research activities, unlike the professors of other departments, while simultaneously playing an important role within the medical profession. However, some organizational or environmental factors decrease the job satisfaction of medical professors. This study aimed to determine the current status of medical schools professors' job activities, satisfaction level, factors related to job satisfaction, and so on. A structured questionnaire was used in the survey and 936 valid responses (response rate, 79.1%) were analyzed using SAS version 9.1. Items included in the questionnaire were work tasks, satisfaction with work and environment, fringe benefits, and future plans. Our study found that the satisfaction of respondents with research activities was not high, and they had negative perceptions of their work environment. Also, it was found that job satisfaction was most affected by work environment. In the section on fringe benefits, a variety of fringe benefits were provided to respondents but their actual satisfaction was not high. To enhance the overall job satisfaction of medical school faculty, all the matters related to their work tasks and environmental factors have to be considered in the aspect of their own role in medical school. The limitations of this study were a low response rate to the early online survey and a long duration of the survey period. However, these limitations were resolved by an additional mail survey modality and statistical techniques. It is meaningful that this study was an extensive survey aimed at medical school faculty and dealt with a comprehensive range of issues.
Figures and Tables
Figure 1
The perception of the work itself. 1. It provides a lot of opportunities to acquire new knowledge or techniques. 2. It's an acknowledged and socially respected job. 3. It gives me intellectual stimulation and a sense of achievement. 4. It's pleasant and rewarding. 5. It affords a lot of opportunities to display one's own ability. 6. It requires a lot of time in clerical (administrative) transactions. 7. It gives me stress. 8. It makes me frustrated. 9. It's boring and gets me fed up. 10. It doesn't matter whether I work hard or just get by. A likert 5-point scale was used.
Figure 2
The perception of the working environment. 1. There is sufficient space for business activities. 2. There is a sufficient workforce for business activities. 3. Working conditions such as noise, lighting, and indoor temperature are pleasant. 4. Medical devices and equipment are sufficient to perform medical services. 5. There is sufficient time for business activities. A likert 5-point scale was used.
Figure 4
Current quality of fringe benefits. 1. Aid for training abroad period and number. 2. Financial aid and approval of period for domestic and international conference attendance. 3. Regular holidays. 4. Amount of pay. 5. Incentive for medical activity. 6. Financial aid for college-aged children. 7. Leave of absence system. 8. Sabbatical system.
Figure 5
Future plan of medical school faculty. 1. Move to another university. 2. Retirement. 3. Open one's own clinic/hospital. 4. Change one's job to another profession. 5. Plan to increase one's research skills or take a sabbatical year. 6. Maintain the current job. 7. Other. 8. No plan for the future (including regular retirement).
Table 2
Respondents' satisfaction with job activities
Values are presented as percent or score.
The 5-likert scales are converted into satisfaction scores and calculated the mean values.
It assumes that some respondent whose major is 'Basic medicine' respond they are doing the medical activity. Because they often conduct the clinical care practice.
a)Busan, Daejeon, Daegu, Gwangju, and Ulsan.
b)Chungcheong-do, Geongsang-do, Kangwon-do, and Jeolla-do.
Table 4
Respondents' satisfaction with items related to clinical practice
Values are presented as score.
The 5-likert scales are converted into satisfaction scores and calculated the mean values.
The cases presented as hyphen(-) means that there's no estimated value.
It assumes that some respondent whose major is 'basic medicine' respond they are doing the medical activity. Because they often conduct the clinical care practice.
a)Busan, Daejeon, Daegu, Gwangju, and Ulsan.
b)Chungcheong-do, Geongsang-do, Kangwon-do, and Jeolla-do.
References
1. Kim KH, Park JH. The perception of medical students for medical education and medical treatment. J Korean Med Assoc. 1999. 42:234–237.
2. Center for Education Statistics. Educational statics service. 2011 Statistical yearbook of education: the number of professors [Internet]. cited 2012 Jun 10. Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute;Available from: http://cesi.kedi.re.kr/index.jsp.
3. Kim S. A study on improvement of teaching and learning in Yonsei University College of Medicine. Korean J Med Educ. 1998. 10:293–307.
4. Park YH, Yoon HB, Jeon SG, Kim HJ, Kim KS. Research on the satisfaction of professors in medical colleges. 2004. Seoul: Research Institute for Healthcare Policy, Korean Medical Association.
5. Lee YS, Chae SJ, Shin JS. Faculties in Korean medical schools: their specialties and inbreeding. Korean J Med Educ. 2004. 16:269–279.
6. Gilmore TN, Hirschhorn L, Kelly M. Challenges of leading and planning in academic medical centers. 1999. Philadelphia: Center for Applied Research.
7. Lee YS, Oh DK, Kim M, Lee YS, Shin JS. Exploration of a leadership competency model for medical school faculties in Korea. Korean J Med Educ. 2010. 22:313–321.
8. Nyquist JG, Hitchcock MA, Teherani A. Faculty satisfaction in academic medicine. New Dir Inst Res. 2000. 2000:33–43.
9. Kim S, Lee MS, Chung MH, Ohrr HC. A study on educational accountability of faculty in medical schools. Korean J Med Educ. 2002. 14:245–256.
10. Reed LE. Determinants of faculty job satisfaction and potential implications for physician assistant program personnel. J Physician Assist Educ. 2006. 17:30–35.
11. Association of American Medical Colleges. Medical faculty job satisfaction: thematic overviews from ten focus groups. 2006. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.
12. Bunton SA, Corrice AM. Job satisfaction of US medical school faculty with a focus on internal medicine departments. Acad Intern Med Insight. 2008. 6:8–9. 15
13. Bunton SA, Corrice AM, Mallon WT. Clinical faculty satisfaction with the academic medicine workplace. 2010. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.
14. Flanigan TS, McFarlane E, Cook S. Conducting survey research among physicians and other medical professionals: a review of current literature [Internet]. 2008. cited 2012 Oct 9. Deerfield (IL): American Association for Public Opinion Research;Available from: http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/proceedings/y2008/Files/flanigan.pdf.
XML Download